(Archived response to Andy Curzon’s post) (1)”The world needs all kinds of minds

(Archived response to Andy Curzon’s post)

(1)”The world needs all kinds of minds” …. yes, that says it all.

(2) Different kinds of minds value different means and ends. (Conversely, ‘we all need to think like this’ is an effort to create a monopoly in values where we need a market in values)

(3) The world needs all kinds of disciplines(means and ends) for those minds to specialize in.

(4) The world needs multiple economic models (production consumption) to provide opportunities for different minds – specialized and not.

(5)The world needs multiple political models (commons construction) that vary according to the distribution of those minds – some with a bias toward collective production (early stage societies) and some with a bias toward voluntary commons production (late stage societies),

(6) The world needs multiple countries/nation-states (markets) for the same reason.

HOWEVER – these are all ‘positiva’ assertions by which search for opportunities of all kinds. How is cooperation possible between so many diverse forms of inquiry, choice, and production of generations, goods, services, information and commons? These are the ‘negativa’ propositions:

(6) The world needs one language – one that corresponds most highly with truth, thereby reducing ignorance, error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, obscurantism, and deceit. That language is TRUTH and the language of truth is science.

7) the world needs one method of decidability in matters of conflict between these diverse polities – equally expressed in the language of truth. That method of decidability is non-imposition of costs against property in toto – that which we call ‘natural law’.

9) And the world needs one method of decidability between preferences(policy): not to sink into dysgenia – which is the natural outcome of all orders that are not explicitly eugenic (west and east), and to transcend the beast man (which is the natural outcome of all orders that are explicitly eugenic.).

This sequence provides decidability for the full scope of the initial proposition, from the individual to mankind.

We can create a market for the positive that we do not know is good, by eliminating the market for that which we do know is bad: that which impedes individual opportunity, productive cooperation, and human transcendence.

The more trial and error the better as long as one is risking (gambling) with his own purse.

Cheers.

Curt Doolittle

The Propertarian Institute

Kiev, Ukraine.