WHY IF WE CANNOT COOPERATE THEN WHY CAN THE NON-RATIONAL VOTE? 1 – Analogies are

WHY IF WE CANNOT COOPERATE THEN WHY CAN THE NON-RATIONAL VOTE?

1 – Analogies are not truths, they are meaningful (educational and informative) but they are not true.

2 – Natural law is blind to race, tribe family, gender, habit, norm, law, tradition, religion. Either you are a thief and a fraud and a free rider, or you engage in productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary exchange limited to productive externalities.

3 – Adults reason and argue. Children moralize. Subhumans opine. Animals feel. Insects react. Bacteria merely lives or dies.

If we cannot engage in argument, then we cannot cooperate truthfully, ethically, morally, productively. One tries to inform the ignorant, educate the child, domesticate by control or enslavement the subhuman and animal. And limit or exterminate the insect and bacteria.

There is no reason because without reason there cannot be, to confuse reason with moralization, opinion, feelings, reactions, and mere life.

For this reason, if one cannot reason then why must we cooperate, and if we cannot cooperate then why can children, sub-humans and animals, vote?