I don’t really know myself what macro problems I intuit need solving. But here is some clarity on categorical consistency.
As you probably know, I see the problem of ignorance error bias and deception as one of laundering information by exposing unknowns, and prohibiting the obscurantism of ignorance by loading, framing, substitution, suggestion, switching existential point of view, and switching argumentative method.
While any of these techniques may be used to convey meaning they cannot be used for argument and deduction with the same veracity as consistency in argumentative method under the existential point of view, moral, categorical, logical, empirical, and scope consistency.
Yet the montage most people argue with consists of precisely these conflations.
Why? Because we removed grammar, logic, and rhetoric and we failed to add economics – incentives and cost – to the educational system.
Not just because teachers would have trouble teaching. But because students would stop buying the pseudoscientific messages.
Source date (UTC): 2016-09-22 03:08:00 UTC
Leave a Reply