WE HAD EPISTEMOLOGY BACKWARD Instances of Deduction(informationally sufficient)

WE HAD EPISTEMOLOGY BACKWARD

Instances of Deduction(informationally sufficient) like instances of Apriorism(survives non-contradiction) occur only as a special case of hypothesizing. And hypotheses occur as a special case of overlapping ‘search results’ (free association). Once we identify a possible search result we criticize it by trying first to justify it (find a potential route to it), and then try to refine that route (test it). This act of refining sometimes results in questionable, sometimes in reasonable, sometimes rational, sometimes in logical, and sometimes in mathematical justifications (potential routes).

There is but one universal method and it consists of:

Free association > Pattern

Wayfinding mental criticism > Hypothesis,

Experimental criticism > Theory,

Practical criticism > Law

Perfect Parsimony > Name