So back to technicals (Andy Edwards Jay Dyer), it is always better to seek to un

So back to technicals (Andy Edwards Jay Dyer), it is always better to seek to understand than to assume you are correct. At present, as far as I know, my work provides the greatest explanatory power that is currently available to us. The problem with it may be the problem with all the sciences: that as a science of the rule of law, it survives all scrutiny. That I can also create a revolutionary demand for it. But that as a personal philosophy, and an ideology, a science is insufficient. And that my estimate that truth is enough of an incentive because it provides a purely meritocratic ethic – is insufficient to inspire. The question remains only whether I am able to do that which I did not set out to do. I set out to create a language, that language has evolved into a science, and a science that is sufficient to restore the west to it’s orgins as the people who take the oath to speak the truth and not steal. But that it is not sufficient to inspire a war. It is still open to me whether that is something I should try to do or not. If to counter our upcoming defeat is not sufficient an inspiration, then I do not see why a story (narrative) would matter. But then I am not motivated by such things, I find them somewhere between entertaining, childish and silly. It is not my language. But that does not mean it is not the language of others.