TRUE VS MORAL Debating whether something is true or not, is very different from

TRUE VS MORAL

Debating whether something is true or not, is very different from debating whether it is moral or not. We too often allow our culture’s framing of discourse as truth, to be used as a vehicle for advocating immorality.

This is why the ‘others’ cannot debate me. I will not fall into the question of whether something is true or not. We can rarely know if answers to great questions are true or not.

We can however know whether the answers to great questions are moral or not.

They are immoral. We are not.

MORAL AND ETHICAL:

Productive

Fully informed

Warrantied

Voluntary Transfer

Limited to externality of the same.

TRUTHFUL TESTIMONY

Warranties of Due Diligence:

– categorical consistency (non-conflation)

– Internal consistency (logical)

– external correspondence (empirical consistency)

– existential consistency (operational definitions)

– full accounting ( against selection bias )

– parsimony and limits ( precision )

– morality – ( natural law of cooperation) consisting of productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary transfer, limited to externalities of the same criteria.)

Because having performed these due diligences, it is extremely difficult to engage in error, bias, wishful thinking, loading-framing-overloading-suggestion, and deceit.