EATING THE WEAK. NO MERCY. —“Saying things like “Better to learn from my work

EATING THE WEAK. NO MERCY.

—“Saying things like “Better to learn from my work and ask questions than think ones self able to participate in philosophical discourse of this magnitude.” is never to anyone’s benefit, for the record. It just makes you sound like infantile and butthurt. Therefore I am not sorry to inform you that oneself*”— anonymous female dimwit.

Again. Shaming. Attempt at using guilt to demand equality when there is none.

This is the feminine reproductive strategy talking, not reason, science, or truth.

Either one can construct an argument that survives criticism or one cannot.

Shaming is what little girls do. Adult men simply seek truth.

I speak as I do to invite challenges.

You speak as you do to avoid them.

Therefore which of us is testing our theories against all comers?

Not you. You haven’t levied one.

See?

The postmodern, feminist, pseudoscientific, era of deception is done.

Welcome to the revolution.

=====

I am a prosecutor of falsehood and deception in ethical, moral, political, and economic theory.

The greatest deceit is pseudoscience and misapplied rationalism.

The preferred tactic is shaming and rallying and walking away from debate.

The only way to overturn the century of pseudoscience and deceit distributed by rallying and shaming is truth.

To prosecute the deceptive I’m all walks of life.

To use truth to defeat and shame the deceitful.

If the truth is unpleasant and you walk away we win.

We silence the liars.

And that is how truth prevails.

Cheers.

( every man a warrior, every man a sheriff, every man a judge, every man a sovereign.)

BTW: Arrogance is a tactic I use to draw criticism on the one hand and defeat shaming on the other.