CURT, WHAT DO YOU CALL AN OBSERVATION?
(frowns)
“An observation”
Observation–>Fact as Hypothesis -> Theory
Observations that survive criticism are facts.
Hypotheses that survive criticism are theories.
I may observe and err. A fact survives tests that I err/bias/think-wishfully/deceive in my observations.
In other words, truth candidacy is a product of survival.
THE CONSTRUCTION OF A FACT
1) something to observe
2) an observer to witness it
3) (possibly) a method of observation (“instrumentation”)
4) a method of recording (memory or instrumentation)
5) a method of criticizing the observation to eliminate error, bias, wishful thinking, and deceit from the record (memory).
If we cannot find a way to falsify the record then we may morally claim it is a truth candidate, and therefore a fact.
Some observations are easy to test: “john wrote that post”.
Some observations are harder to test: “that car hit the pedestrian”.
Some observations are very hard to test: last year’s faster than light problem due to improper fitting of a connector.
It’s not hard guys unless you confuse the application of justifiction (law) to criticism (science). Which is common.
Curt
Source date (UTC): 2016-01-11 02:17:00 UTC
Leave a Reply