Q&A: “WHAT IS THE ROLE OF WOMEN IN PROPERTARIANISM?” Propertarianism is a Critic

Q&A: “WHAT IS THE ROLE OF WOMEN IN PROPERTARIANISM?”

Propertarianism is a Critical(what-may-not) and therefore scientific system of logic, and not a Justificationary(what-should) and therefore idealistic system of logic. So propertarianism seeks to prevent harm: ‘badness’. Everything that does not prevent harm is a candidate for benefit: ‘goodness’.

Just as Testimonialism prevents falsehood, leaving only candidates for truth; and just as Propertarian ethics seeks to prevent lying and theft, leaving only candidates for honest voluntary transfer; Propertarian politics seeks to prevent the harm women do, but not what they should do, leaving only candidates for not harming.

Men pay for their enfranchisement with military and emergency services. In propertarianism women pay for their enfranchisement with child bearing, and care-taking services. These are high costs, but they are necessary costs.

Rule of law is identical regardless of gender; policy exists to promote the family not the individual; and policy is constructed by contracts between ‘houses’.

And ‘houses’ are constructed by gender and class. So women have their own house to negotiate with males, just as the upper classes have a house to negotiate with the middle. Membership in houses is by demonstrated accomplishment.

So, what do women (and men) do under Propertarianism? Anything they want that doesn’t impose costs upon others. Do nothing unto others you would not want done unto you.

I am trying to prevent the repeat of the damage that women have done to civilization because of their biological biases, just as we have struggled to prevent the damage done by men because of their biological biases.

Women (with assistance from the enlightenment thinkers) destroyed the west via the voting booth. It is possible to eliminate the means by which they destroyed the west. And finally succeed in enfranchising women as we have enfranchised other men: by facilitating voluntary exchanges between people with different reproductive strategies. The compromise path will prevent extremes.