Q&A: WTF ARE YOU GUYS TALKING ABOUT? 😉 —“I have to ask… what the actual FUC

Q&A: WTF ARE YOU GUYS TALKING ABOUT? 😉

—“I have to ask… what the actual FUCK are you guys talking about? From the outside this all reads like complete and utter nonsense — but each of you seem convinced that what you are speaking to is real, and concrete. Help a brother out.”—-Michael V. Coppola

It’s not nonsense really. Its actually a profoundly important argument.

WHY?

Leftists rely on loading(adding emotional content), framing(selective presentation of argument) and overloading (repetition and propaganda), to advance their agenda with pseudoscience, misrepresentation, and outright lying, and to resist criticism by rallying and shaming (what we call political correctness).

What the other guys are arguing is that without government, media, and academy (“the Cathedral Complex”) they can use the same techniques to ‘inspire’ a competing alternative religion. And second, that I should adopt this strategy in my work.

Now my work is the merger of science and philosophy into what I call Testimonialism (an extension of the scientific method), and Propertarianism (an extension of property rights, rule of law, and classical government), and what I have done is created an amoral (which means objective and emotionless) language and logic that does not require we rely upon introspection to determine if something is truly objectively moral or not.

I want to make it very difficult to lie in public when discussing the production of commons (politics). They want to preserve this dishonest form of argument because they feel the heroic tradition is not enough to inspire people (despite the evidence of its persistence across millennia).

They are advocating that I do the opposite. which defeats the entire purpose of my work: creating an environment as saturated with truth, as the post-christian era was saturated with reason, and the current era is saturated with physical science. I want to restore the high trust society, restore us to truthful discourse, and make it impossible for parasites to compete and survive within our society.

Now, normally I would see this argument as silly but I have a long standing policy of defeating attackers completely, and it’s a great opportunity to discuss this problem with people who are highly invested (ON THE RIGHT) but who want to continue to make use of the tools that enabled THE LEFT.

That’s basically it.

Thanks for asking.

Curt Doolittle

The Philosophy of Aristocracy

The Propertarian Institute

Kiev, Ukraine