IT’S SIMPLE: READ CARLYLE (MORAL), READ DOOLITTLE (SCIENTIFIC). I can’t read a C

IT’S SIMPLE: READ CARLYLE (MORAL), READ DOOLITTLE (SCIENTIFIC).

I can’t read a Carlyle – or any other of the conservatives for that matter. I become too frustrated trying to translate their language into something scientific or analytic to work with. But some people need meaning: stepping stones. And Carlyle provides stepping stones. Hayek’s two essays on economics as information, and his Constitution of Liberty are good stepping stones.

You know, Mencius was intuitively right. He just couldn’t provide a solution because he didn’t, as Carlyle didn’t, as Hayek didn’t, as Hegel didn’t, as all of the historians didn’t, understand the secret of western velocity: truth, commons, and the total suppression of parasitism by institutional means.

Propertarianism repairs truth, science, philosophy, ethics and morality, law and politics, and erases and reconstitutes both psychology and social science.

How do I make it into a course now? Can I do that? I am not sure I am good enough. I can finish the book. But can I make a course of it? Or do I need someone else to do that at some later point in time