STANGELOOP NRx AND YARVIN Here is how it makes sense. if you want to object to a

STANGELOOP NRx AND YARVIN

Here is how it makes sense. if you want to object to a speaker, then gather a petition of not less than 5% of the registered attendees. If you gather that petition, then the speaker AND the signatories are disinvited.

This stops shenanigans.

NOTE: I am in favor of violence against gossipers. I mean, Steve Klabnik (the lefty who complained vociferously) advocates use of violence against his opponents. If you have an argument then put one forward. If you want to use gossip, rallying and shaming, then that is not an argument. My agreement to forgo violence is predicated on your limiting yourself to truthful, rational, scientific, argument. If you violate that agreement then I am no longer bound by an agreement to cooperate. And we can have a duel. And if you refuse the duel, then I will just rectify the situation.

Do you see now why libel, slander, and duel were so important to western development?

Do you see why gossip, pseudo-morality, pseudo-rationalism, propaganda, and pseudoscience were so effectively used against the west?

I do.