MY JOB AS A PHILOSOPHER. YOUR JOB AS ADVOCATE. Johannes writes: —“…negativit

MY JOB AS A PHILOSOPHER. YOUR JOB AS ADVOCATE.

Johannes writes:

—“…negativity (and negative definitions) are useful only for so long…”—

Yeah… I get it though.

I usually say “Arguments against something are not arguments in favor of something.” To act, we need something to act in favor of: a solution.

**I’m arguing in favor of the positive expression as property rights, of the negative prohibition against parasitism, for the purpose of constructing a post-democratic political order, in which we conduct personal (private) and political (commons) exchanges,, that are mutually desired, mutually productive and free of parasitism. In effect, Im advocating moral government.***

I just didn’t realize when I started out that I was going to fix a 2500 year old problem in philosophy: what does truth mean, and what is this problem of epistemology? I spent the first part of 2013 trying to figure out if I had to solve these problems or not, and it has taken me two additional years of work to do so.

My original hypothesis on the structure of moral government hasn’t changed. My ability to articulate the necessity of such a thing, and to defend it has changed. And that is largely due to solving (completing) the failed or incomplete Operational project of the 20th century. And by consequence, gaining an understanding of the vast conspiracy of deceit conducted by the left, and the total failure of the right to develop a scientific statement of its position.

The reason the right has failed is democracy is predicated on the assumption that all want to join the aristocracy: an equalitarian of aristocracy of everyone. This is demonstrably false. We see that the world cannot bear meritocracy. It only lightly bears truth. And whenever possible people preserve all the cheating that is possible: it is so much easier that providing material value.

I know what I must do first, and that is a bit of science. I am working on the science. Meaning: the truthful expression of philosophy, including metaphysics, ethics, politics, and aesthetics. One can write popular science only after the science is done. And all science is negative. All true statements are prohibitive. All utilitarian, and therefore theoretical statements are positive. Evolution helped us act, but it did not prepare us for science. As such truth is often counter-intuitive.

That is one of the revolutions we just went through.

Anyway. To save the west requires science, solution, advocacy in that order. My job is the science and solution. And everyone else’s job is advocacy.Roman is very adamant. And I’m sticking with his advice.

Philosophers invent, teachers teach, students implement, everyone else responds.

I’m doing my job. And i’m doing it with TRANSPARENCY, right out in the open like craftsman on the street – for all who are interested to see.

Cheers

Curt Doolittle

The Propertarian Institute

Kiev, Ukraine.