RACE IS A MATTER OF DISTRIBUTIONS I hate this discussion, but since my position

RACE IS A MATTER OF DISTRIBUTIONS

I hate this discussion, but since my position is somewhat novel, I feel the need to vent my frustration at what I see as a the result of a series of mainstream errors that attempt to justify democracy by criticizing the natural and unavoidable behavior of man.

Race: Demonstrated behavior in favor of kin selection; most commonly demonstrated as some form of ostracization by means of (a) physical and legal, (b) boycott of commerce and cooperation, (c) gossip and ridicule.

I hate this discussion because it’s a byproduct of the fallacy of democracy. People will never stop favoring kin selection in politics or any other walk of life. Race is extremely valuable to the middle and lower classes, and almost entirely irrelevant to the upper classes. The margins will always interbreed because it’s to their status advantage if not their offspring’s. Democratic empires are a catastrophe that makes hostility out of families with different abilities, needs and wants.

THE PROPERTARIAN ARGUMENT:

The only material difference between the races is the rates of reproduction of the underclasses. This problem was solved in the west by manorialism and harsh winters, and in the east through starvation and easy killing. In modernity it can be solved through redistribution in exchange for one child limits.

The only significant difference between races is merely one of distributions.

Without this difference in distributions, we would have very few political problems between the races of man.


Source date (UTC): 2015-05-02 04:09:00 UTC

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *