The silly-tarians who argue from moral intuition, and nothing else – they aren’t

The silly-tarians who argue from moral intuition, and nothing else – they aren’t harmful, or vectors for lies.

Traditional libertarianism (versus immoral libertinism) is a combination of what we consider morality, psychology and law.

It is a skeptical political science driven by historical evidence not a specific prescription for actions, not a claim to authoritarian scripture (as is all cosmopolitanism).

It raises the e question of whether the cosmopolitan moral blindness is an artifact of centuries of debating scripture versus reality – and like all cultures the cosmopolitans were blinded by enforced ignorance.