(regarding previous post) The Libertine(Rothbardian) argument is to abandon all

(regarding previous post)

The Libertine(Rothbardian) argument is to abandon all consideration of the competitive production of commons and to return to a low trust levantine polity of pervasively unethical and immoral conditions. (Rothbard, Rockwell, and Block).

However, the propertarian solution is to eliminate the possibility of rents and free riding on the production of commons using competing houses and private production of commons, by requiring contracts, strict construction and original intent, operational calculability, transparency and universal standing. (Methods and procedures that are common in businesses world wide).

I am having a very hard time determining what commons can honestly be demonstrated to be victims of free riding, even if many are subject to privatization and socialization. This is well covered in the literature, and as far as I know, regulation and rent seeking are the cause of most difficulties.