MORAL BLINDNESS AND DEMONSTRATED SOCIAL INTELLIGENCE (interesting post)(reposted

MORAL BLINDNESS AND DEMONSTRATED SOCIAL INTELLIGENCE

(interesting post)(reposted from comment)

What I didn’t understand was that the left’s solipsism is non-cognitive, morally blind, inalterable, and very powerful. From the data conservatives understand the world most accurately. followed by moderate democrats who are just practical. libertarians understand the world less, but they use economics as a proxy for understanding which is kind of fascinating really now that I understand it. Progressives have very little grasp of the world, and very little of morality, but do not use economics as a proxy for understanding because they’re confident.

The left is a genetic expression of the female need to care for a child and advocate for the child in the context of the tribe regardless of the rationality of doing so for the tribe, and regardless of the child’s merits. It’s why mothers of serial killers don’t believe their son’s are guilty, and progressives think that children are the product of the environment not their genes. A mother’s love at the political level. It is understandable in this context, but not rational or beneficial in this context.

I don’t know the degree to which the ‘cathedral’ influences morality, but using postmodern language has certainly helped them with the educated classes who are LESS dependent on morality. So, in the educated classes, both of which are less moral than the less educated classes, of the two of them, only one (libertarians) uses a proxy for morality, and the other (progressives) have no proxy – no means of sensing objective morality, and no desire for one. Libertarians are outnumbered by progressives more than two to one.

Libertarians have been distracted by ‘immoral libertarianism’ for thirty years. And unable to fulfill their role as the intellectual leadership of conservatives. So I’m illustrating the errors of immoral libertarianism, and libertarian moral blindness, so that liberty seekers can once again form the intellectual leadership of the much more numerous conservatives.