NONSENSE —“We would have to start with a clarification of the terms. Capitalis

NONSENSE

—“We would have to start with a clarification of the terms. Capitalism is an economic system that exists in various forms over time & in different places but it has certain core essential features”—

THE UNIVERSAL REFUTATION OF SOCIALISM

The vague term ‘economic system’ is a form of deception. Capitalism is a MEANS OF PRODUCTION.

The capitalist means of production is possible because both the incentives to do what we do not wish to do, and the means of calculating how to do so, are available to us; such that by doing what we may not wish to do, we do what we are capable of doing, and by doing so satisfy the wants of others, such that we may finally satisfy our own wants.

The socialist means of production is not possible. It is impossible. It is impossible because neither the means of calculation, nor the incentive to do what we do not desire to, exists in that method of production.

Marxism is the biggest organized systemic set of lies since the invention of scriptural monotheism. It is the most murderous religion ever created by man – by replacing mystical allegory with verbal obscurantism and pseudoscience.

If you cannot explain an economic argument in operational language you are either engaged in ignorance or deception or perpetuating deception out of ignorance.

—“libertarian socialism”–

Like socialist economy, ‘libertarian socialism’ is a contradiction in terms. One cannot create an economy under the socialist method of production. One cannot create socialism from libertarianism. The reason being that libertarian is defined by the necessity of private property, and socialism is defined by the necessity of community property.

PERIOD.

I am surprised that anyone still can get away with writing the irrational mystical obscurant deceptive lies of socialist dogma but given the durability of mystical scriptural religion I should not be.

Socialism is pseudoscience. It is a religion dependent, like postmodernism, on the abuse of language in order to deceive mediocre and ignorant minds.

My opinion is that it is only immoral. But I could easily make the argument that obscurant arguments for the purpose of conducting theft by conspiracy (socialism) are CRIMINAL acts.

The fact that we tolerate free speech is because we feel we may err. However, we do not tolerate shouting fire in a theater, nor should we tolerate advocacy of suicide.

Which is what socialism is: suicide.

If you advocate socialism you are, ignorant or not, at the very least an immoral person. And arguably a criminal who deserves punishment.