(artificial intelligence)
Just had a thought. Scary cool.
If I finish propertarianism, it is now possible to create both an AI, and to give it moral and ethical rules that it cannot violate. It cannot violate them through self deception via self obscurantism either.
wow…. Gotta put out a short story on that fairly quickly. Don’t have time tho.
THAT IS IT!!!!!
In college I wrote software that simulated an intelligent ‘tank’, using emotional rewards, and sixteen different emotions. But my problem was I just could not figure out how to tune rules for the emotions to produce the right behavior. I couldn’t come up with consistent rules……….
Property is a consistent rule. Property=morality. But property RIGHTS are distributed among groups differently, because different groups use different property rights structures to suit needed reproductive strategies given local structures of production, and given local competitors in production.
So like any ‘technology’ property rights are paradigmatic: the structure of production, the structure of reproduction (the family) and the structure of property rights that allow cooperation within that paradigmatic structure.
I don’t like the paradigm argument because it’s too closely related to ‘belief’ and not closely enough related to instrumentalism.
MORE RECENTLY – RUNCIBLE
We were thinking of a new company using a new programming technology and spatial manifolds to store complex data. This could use existing technology even if new forms of programming.
The problem none of us could solve was the data structure. Language is very problematic because of its complexity and loading. But, all language can be reduced to statements of property, property rights, and voluntary or involuntary transfer.
Property is the data structure.
PROPERTY IS THE UNIVERSAL COMPUTATIONAL DATA STRUCTURE.
Is this the underlying problem that my subconscious autistic mind has been fighting with for decades?????????? Is this the ‘problem’ that that frustrating enormous obsessive machine in my head ‘senses’ but could not solve? That will nearly kill me if I don’t keep it fed with problems related to it?
I know that my psychological motivation comes from a combination of obsessive autism, the need to understand, and the desire to prevent conflict.
But …. But I think this might be what I was intuitively searching for…… I’ve been carrying this frustration for decades… and I think this is it.
It was very smart not to rush my book this year. I am very close now to a compact argument. The last science so to speak.
Hmmm….
Source date (UTC): 2013-12-29 07:47:00 UTC
Leave a Reply