Interesting how the MORAL people who CHOOSE to sacrifice something ELSE in order

Interesting how the MORAL people who CHOOSE to sacrifice something ELSE in order to have health care, are now paying for the IMMORAL PEOPLE who CHOSE something OTHER than health care.

It is not that health care is ‘unaffordable’. It’s that health care is something you would prefer to spend your marginal income on LESS than whatever you spend it on, such as your own apartment, your car, your entertainment. etc.

I won’t go into all the incentives here, but if you made a law that you had to have health care or you couldn’t drive, couldn’t vote, couldn’t collect social security or anything else for that matter – and that you had to ‘earn’ your redistribution by ‘beautifying the country’ (cleaning it up and maintaining the commons) then that would make perfect sense to me.

But everything we do in the statist empire is to create every immoral malincentive possible to encourage the free-riding that the west worked so hard to stamp out.