WHO TOLD ME ABOUT _BOUNDARIES OF ORDER_ AT PFS? (question) Ok, so I have given i

WHO TOLD ME ABOUT _BOUNDARIES OF ORDER_ AT PFS?

(question)

Ok, so I have given it a second pass, and you know it’s just written romantically and worldly, and the whole (damned) justificationism of bringing in correspondence with nature is a useless mess. But honestly, that said, he did, as you’ve told me, do a pretty good job with it.

It’s still an appeal. I don’t want to make appeals. Appeals are a dead issue for libertarians. Moral diversity means we will forever fall on deaf ears.

But NECESSITY (they hayekian program, and the Hoppeian program) is something else entirely. It isn’t that we PREFER one thing or another, it’s that prosperity REQUIRES certain things and requires we DON”T DO other things.

Property is synonymous with morality. HOWEVER, the distribution of rights and rewards from property are determined by the structure of REPRODUCTION. As such, while economic and political thoguth iis NOT POLYLOGISTIC, it is POLYMORAL, because reproductive rights are DIVERSE AND IRRECONCILABLE except through PROPERTY RIGHTS.

Propertarianism is an evolution over current libertarianism because it has BROADER EXPLANATORY POWER and is not based upon PREFERENCE for liberty, but NECESSITY in balancing scarcity, production, and reproduction by making cooperation between heterogeneous moral codes POSSIBLE.

***For all intents and purposes, different family structures render us into behaving as different tribes, if not different species.***

We have no means of reconciling this difference. Because there are material differences between the gene pools.

So we must construct political systems, like the market, to allow for heterogenous investment and production, while doing what the market cannot: inhibit our willingness to cooperate because of free riding, privatization, socialization and rent seeking.

That is the one purpose we must put government to. Because privatizations of commons is indeed a problem that the market cannot on its own solve, at least, solve competitively.