ZOROASTER ABRAHAM JESUS MARX FREUD CANTOR
AND
AQUINAS ROUSSEAU KANT HEIDEGGER FOUCAULT DERRIDA RORTY
-VS-
ARISTOTLE BACON DESCARTES NEWTON PIERCE POPPER-KUHN
AND
MACHIAVELLI LOCKE SMITH HUME DARWIN HAYEK
Why does philosophy have to be such a 50/50 proposition between intellectual biohazards, and intellectual steroids?
It’s freaking exasperating that it takes one most of one’s life to master intellectual history marginally well enough to know what is poison and hallucinogen, and what is vitamin and antidote.
(Now, I get to have some debate no doubt on who I included and didn’t and why, just like we’re talking about why I don’t like java and I like PHP more than Python. lol.)
Source date (UTC): 2013-10-06 10:02:00 UTC
Leave a Reply