An Archive of sketches developing ideas.
1) IQ is the most accurate measure in psychology2) Stereotypes are the most accurate measure in social science.3) Neoteny is the most accurate measure in biology. Source date (UTC): 2025-12-18
False. (Magical thinking)See: Source date (UTC): 2025-12-18 17:07:39 UTC Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2001700900910645378
( Will is a good guy. 😉 ) Source date (UTC): 2025-12-15 23:40:48 UTC Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2000712677199634770
That’s not true. The operations available in set a, and consequential set b are different, but they are directionally the same. There is no difference between the logic of spin
Look. I don’t need help getting confused. I mean, have you seen the crew of guys I work with every day? And they take JOY in it… lol Source date
Well, I know. I’m agreeing. The point I’m making is that the way I use symbols requires the domain (Scale) of what I’m discussing. This appears inconsistent but it isn’t.
You’re thinking too hard. 😉 It’s a simple issue of logical dependency.<,> greater than, less than (scale)<-, -> dependency (causality)Nothing else to be said. Source date (UTC): 2025-12-15 23:13:54 UTC
lol. Jon. Are those two statements necessarily mutually exclusive? lol -hugs. The reducibility stack using “<” means the item to the right constitutes a larger field than the item to
(RUNCIBLE)Had a wonderful conversation with a DC insider this morning about Runcible, thanks to our own Josh Reider. I used a different story to explain why our Runcible governance layer
Perfect. 🙂 Source date (UTC): 2025-12-15 20:42:05 UTC Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2000667702348931393
(Worth The Read)A survey of the reasons for the decline of europe: the many forms of hubris. Source date (UTC): 2025-12-15 20:29:33 UTC Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2000664549524169067
Daniel. True.Brilliant. Thank you so much. Curt DoolittleThe Natural Law Institute Source date (UTC): 2025-12-15 20:28:42 UTC Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2000664333970456726
It’s neoteny. It’s just neoteny. We select for neoteny. Source date (UTC): 2025-12-15 20:23:43 UTC Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2000663078963466630
Yes, though I haven’t had time to test whether I can circumvent 5.2. But in general, 4 was better than 5.1, and 5.1 better than 5.2. So as far as
Yes. Which is my argument as well. The difference is that I don’t agree that the action sequence (physical) must replace the communication sequence (verbal). Humans build a world model
I want not such thing, especially having lived there. Source date (UTC): 2025-12-15 11:16:59 UTC Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2000525488842801660
LINL: https://chatgpt.com/share/693f86e2-7b2c-800e-86bd-68c037cff9c4… Source date (UTC): 2025-12-15 04:03:23 UTC Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2000416370002166123
Load this. then search for “yes, continue”. that will provide the final two queries that answer your question. Net/Net: Good try for someone using philosophical frame. Hints at non-false categories.
SASHANK;Everything the administration says, is to force europe to carry the continental weight (they can) so that the USA can carry the pacific weight. There is nothing else going on.
Yann LeCun’s wrong. LLM’s solve the language faculty. That doesn’t mean they solve all faculties. It means the compression of the language model is insufficient for dense physical world models.