Thoughts

Love you man. And again, your intellectual development and ability to articulate insights is just magical and inspiring to watch. ;). Thanks for all you do. Source date (UTC): 2025-12-30

@iruletheworldmo Any sufficient scope of hierarchically recursive memory will deterministically approach consistent intuition, emergence of consciousness, and emergence of reasoning. The difference is that humans cannot use and maintain as

RL: (a) very few people think in the sense you mean it – I’ve seen estimates but they are so depressing it’s frightening. (b) nearly all people are like fish

RK: High trust polities that are geographically and demographically insulated from cross-cultural (norms, traditions, institutions, myths) and cross demographic (ability) populations tend to extrapolate their behavior onto others. It’s the

Stephen, you have such a gentlemanly sense of academic humor. 😉 Maybe we should gift you a smoking jacket…. 😉 Source date (UTC): 2025-12-30 04:33:53 UTC Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2005859863826510247

Resolving Philosophy’s “Big Questions” through Operational Decidability Natural Law Institute White Paper No. 2025-09-15 Authored by: B. E. Curt Doolittle Affiliation: Natural Law Institute, Runcible Inc. Contributors: Natural Law Institute

(Worth Repeating)Most people who encounter my work do not know the context in which I work, which is to attempt to use truth however uncomfortable to get us to reform

FWIW: Your feed and your positions consistently represent a shared understanding. I don’t see a single position I hold differently. I put less interest on investment returns because I work

EUROPE: IT DOESN’T MATTER HOW YOU FEEL.The USA cannot fund its internal and external demands any longer. It hasn’t been able to for over twenty years. So the point is

I push back on McGilchrist frequently because I’m aware of his agenda:1. hemispheric bias … just bias, not exclusive specialization. Also, in the visual cortex (back of the brain, largely

WHY RUNCIBLE IS AHEAD OF THE AI CURVE–“Prediction (speculative): The next discontinuity [in AI] will not come from “more parameters” per se; it will come from architectures that treat the

I do also. But we can either choose to carry the water for the rest of humanity or we can leave it to those with less moral interests to continue

yes. Source date (UTC): 2025-12-26 23:45:27 UTC Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2004700114028490935

Yes. (Though my present interlocutor @ContntofChrchtr happears intellectually honest so I will continue to presume so.) No one outside of our organization understands teh level of linguistic analysis we apply,

–“Hyperdeflation of the cost of intelligence will not stay constrained to the data centers – it will spread outward from these benchmarks to the rest of the economy.”– Alexander Wissner-Gross

Could you restate that since I’m not unambiguously clear which assertion you’re making. Source date (UTC): 2025-12-26 19:35:22 UTC Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2004637178119483824

We’ll it’s not accurate for you. For the same reason racism isn’t interpersonally rational – only politically. Because while we can judge a group by the properties of it’s individuals

“IT JUST MIGHT BE THE CASE THAT WOMEN ARE MORE DISCONTENT THAN MEN ARE.”(relationships, divorce, the family)–“dissatisfaction that women experience is rooted in inappropriate expectations. Women have been sold a

Um… I’m a conservative libertarian public intellectual usually miscast as hyper-conservative. It’s only a few times a year someone accuses me of leftism – which usually provokes giggles from the

Which has nothing to do with anything I’ve said. Source date (UTC): 2025-12-26 12:44:41 UTC Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2004533825813283026