An Archive of sketches developing ideas.
Aren’t you supposed to be the naive, benevolent psychologist with optimistic anticipations of the potential of mankind? lolz. -hugs Source date (UTC): 2026-01-09 05:48:38 UTC Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2009502554351337496
How long did it take darwin? Longer than I. 😉You can keep trying. But you can’t defeat my arguments. Sorry. You’re just an infantilized girl railing in the wind. All
PS: The proper context of non-aggression is called ‘trespass’ or what we in the west call ‘tort’. Research my work on ‘demonstrated interests’. via ChatGPTDoolittle defines demonstrated interests operationally: the
If you can’t understand what I wrote it’s because you are too ignorant of the subject matter, even the libertarian subject matter, to hold an opinion, and even less to
THE US MOTIVES FOR ACTIONS IN VENEZUELA I think that the European and American mind, for reasons that are archaic, considers war being limited to military form, whereas any external
Not sure why you consider that post anything to do with Greenland. You’re misreading the context? And yes I am a philosopher, social scientist, and serial entrepreneur with multiple $100M
(Runcible)–“We can not only save the truth verdicts that runcible issues, but we can save the false verdicts and train the AI to identify and explain the error that the
The non aggression principle is not european, it’s ashkenazi. Europeans do not limit themselves to intersubjectively verifiable property, they include informal and formal capital. You do not know this but
I didn’t say that at all. I said that the outcome for both parties over time would be deterministic. Don’t confuse my explanation for advocacy. I’m not a child. Source
You are making the mistake that an alternative is an option. The pax americana is no longer possible, and the postwar consensus has been overthrown by the rise of a
Pax Americana like democratic rule of law has not been perfect, but it has been the best of the alternatives. Your world will not be a better place upon its
Correct. Source date (UTC): 2026-01-06 16:45:52 UTC Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2008580787982209185
It won’t produce decline for the USA. It will simply mean every group on earth has to pay their way. And that the. USA cannot necessarily counter the rise of
Don’t be a nitwit. I didn’t say that. I said that’s what the strategists are saying. That’s their argument. NLI’s policy is ‘let a thousand nations bloom’ in order to
Correct. Source date (UTC): 2026-01-06 14:26:43 UTC Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2008545770098881010
That’s not true. Some of us build companies or contribute to others’ companies while exercising our particular and often niche interests outside of our occupations. Source date (UTC): 2026-01-06 14:24:44
@WerrellBradley Looks like you were right (again). 😉 Source date (UTC): 2026-01-06 14:05:50 UTC Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2008540517408420045
I understand. But as a safety strategy, at least at present, it makes at least some sense. Source date (UTC): 2026-01-06 13:57:32 UTC Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2008538427286057140
Yes. Really. But of course moral scope is relative. But the British act of ending slavery and spreading rule of law, trade, and the church’s spread of christian ethics, are
Yes of course. But what evidence do you have that we can stop the authoritarians. We are currently ‘waiting out’ the demographic collapse of russia and china. But europe is