An Archive of sketches developing ideas.
(Runcible) RE: LLM R&DTL/DR;Yeah, well, LLMs are really pretty dumb and I’ve sought and hit the limit of their abilities. And it’s been an exasperating journey of dashed hopes. 😉
IMO: 1) They are exceptional synthetic search engines. In other words – pattern matchers.2) They imitate the human language facility. In that sense they are amazing. But they don’t imitate
IMO A) There are a limited number of agent patterns.B) very few agents are of any meaningful value even to power users. Everything I have seen could have been easily
No idea why but I’m glad. 😉 Source date (UTC): 2026-02-09 22:59:04 UTC Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2020995896138461216
Thx 😉 Source date (UTC): 2026-02-09 22:58:22 UTC Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2020995720984265148
More: Crime: It’s Not Poverty, it’s Genetics and Culture(via @FS4420) Source date (UTC): 2026-02-09 21:29:46 UTC Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2020973424282370119
yes. Shared. 😉 Source date (UTC): 2026-02-09 21:28:42 UTC Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2020973152780906625
Another insight: The elegant manners in the tradition of european philosophical rhetoric are a tool for debate between intellectually honest people attempting to make their arguments before a jury of
–“Our premise was early escalation to ‘voice’ might lead to escalation to ‘influence’ and that is better than trying to obtain voice and influence amid chaos. Better to be first
Smart man. Yes. Our premise was escalation to ‘voice’ might lead to escalation to ‘influence’ and that is better than trying to obtain voice and influence amid chaos. Better to
BTW: (Going through the Github repository.)This is solid work. I haven’t seen anything this good by anyone else yet.Well done. Source date (UTC): 2026-02-09 20:50:05 UTC Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2020963437921394728
Just to confirm your point…At Runcible we produce a governance layer with the equivalent of your ‘stop’ conditions. It’s much more than that. It’s epistemic rigor for machines, and only
Yet another insight: Gary Stanley Becker really brought what the austirans sought into scientific formalism. So while I appreciate Hazlitt’s Economics in one lesson, the austrian (at least misesian) attempt
Added you to our list.We’ll treat you as part of our extended team.Thanks for your investment in this project.CD Source date (UTC): 2026-02-09 19:56:46 UTC Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2020950018753167849
RE: –“Why Modern Economics Is Built on a Lie w/ Bob Murphy”–See: https://youtube.com/watch?v=hYtf9Op3poA… Bob is pretty much always right. I’ll try to clarify: a) Economics consist of high causal density.
Another thought..In general, changes in the world and changes in our bodies that cause change in assets causes change in biochemistry causes change in emotion, causes interruption or influence on
Long time friend Simon Strong posts one of his insights with a video on the West Eurasian Holocene Source date (UTC): 2026-02-09 19:13:19 UTC Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2020939085003866551
Emotions are not causes they are consequences. What is the cause of each of the emotions used? It is always a change in demonstrated interests. The body and brain calculate
it might be that I have too much else going on in my head at the moment, but I recognize both premises but I’m not sure the relation you’re making.
—“How can you Americans live with this scum as US president?”— Because we know he is trying to restore responsibility and particularly civic and national responsibility. And why? Because europeans