Theme: Truth

  • The Etymology of Agency

    Yes, agency, like truth, or infinity, or perfection, or godhood, or moving half-way across the couch, or half-way across zeno’s line, describes an infinitely logarithmic curve. I always take my terms, whenever possible from the existing sciences, and ‘correct’ (redefine) the term. In social science, one’s social, economic, and political agency is limited by ‘structure’ (institutions), and their (socialist) implication is that differences in income are an institutional choice not a necessity of human cooperation (natural law). In social science then, we are considered to be equal in ability but unequal in institutional benefit. So I extended Agency by correcting the falsehood of equality and necessity.

  • The Etymology of Agency

    Yes, agency, like truth, or infinity, or perfection, or godhood, or moving half-way across the couch, or half-way across zeno’s line, describes an infinitely logarithmic curve. I always take my terms, whenever possible from the existing sciences, and ‘correct’ (redefine) the term. In social science, one’s social, economic, and political agency is limited by ‘structure’ (institutions), and their (socialist) implication is that differences in income are an institutional choice not a necessity of human cooperation (natural law). In social science then, we are considered to be equal in ability but unequal in institutional benefit. So I extended Agency by correcting the falsehood of equality and necessity.

  • THE ETYMOLOGY OF AGENCY Yes, agency, like truth, or infinity, or perfection, or

    THE ETYMOLOGY OF AGENCY

    Yes, agency, like truth, or infinity, or perfection, or godhood, or moving half-way across the couch, or half-way across zeno’s line, describes an infinitely logarithmic curve.

    I always take my terms, whenever possible from the existing sciences, and ‘correct’ (redefine) the term.

    In social science, one’s social, economic, and political agency is limited by ‘structure’ (institutions), and their (socialist) implication is that differences in income are an institutional choice not a necessity of human cooperation (natural law).

    In social science then, we are considered to be equal in ability but unequal in institutional benefit.

    So I extended Agency by correcting the falsehood of equality and necessity.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-01 11:05:00 UTC

  • The Next Reformation of Our Church (Religion)

    I can find dozens of liars throughout history, and tens of thousands to rewrite their words, and millions to repeat their words – on any subject. Just as we can find millions of liars today in the postmodern movement, just as we could find millions a few decades ago in the marxist and bolshevik movement. Che was one of the worst people to live in modernity, but his image is used world round as a savior of modernity. Marx caused 100M dead and he is treated as a savior. Mohammed caused 750M deaths at a minimum, destroyed the great civilizations of the ancient world, and is the longest threat to prosperity man ever made, yet he is a prophet, his words memorized, his warfare deified. The christians were instrumental in the destruction of the roman empire, and the church in undermining the aristocracy, and empire, and the church responsible for the conversion and submission, and illiteracy of europeans to the point where without the vikings, and the remilitarization of europe to resist them, they would have been too weak to resist the muslims. And today christians and their postmodern descendants are the advocates of bringing in the Hordes among us. By the time we overthrew the church half of the capital in europe was ‘dead’ (static), feeding the parasitic, corrupt, church and her politics. Today the church works daily to undermine western civilization. What separates evangelicals from the church is that they have half-recovered. The history of the church is of appropriation of credit they did not earn, and avoidance of criticism that they did. We nearly escaped her with 19th century romanticism, yet the catholic, half catholic, and orthodox countries destroyed germany, which was the remaining engine of our traditions. That we need a church or temple is one thing. That charity must be personally performed is another. That mindfulness is necessary for the many is yet another, but the cancer upon mankind that is abrahamism must end forever as the most evil lie ever invented.

  • The Next Reformation of Our Church (Religion)

    I can find dozens of liars throughout history, and tens of thousands to rewrite their words, and millions to repeat their words – on any subject. Just as we can find millions of liars today in the postmodern movement, just as we could find millions a few decades ago in the marxist and bolshevik movement. Che was one of the worst people to live in modernity, but his image is used world round as a savior of modernity. Marx caused 100M dead and he is treated as a savior. Mohammed caused 750M deaths at a minimum, destroyed the great civilizations of the ancient world, and is the longest threat to prosperity man ever made, yet he is a prophet, his words memorized, his warfare deified. The christians were instrumental in the destruction of the roman empire, and the church in undermining the aristocracy, and empire, and the church responsible for the conversion and submission, and illiteracy of europeans to the point where without the vikings, and the remilitarization of europe to resist them, they would have been too weak to resist the muslims. And today christians and their postmodern descendants are the advocates of bringing in the Hordes among us. By the time we overthrew the church half of the capital in europe was ‘dead’ (static), feeding the parasitic, corrupt, church and her politics. Today the church works daily to undermine western civilization. What separates evangelicals from the church is that they have half-recovered. The history of the church is of appropriation of credit they did not earn, and avoidance of criticism that they did. We nearly escaped her with 19th century romanticism, yet the catholic, half catholic, and orthodox countries destroyed germany, which was the remaining engine of our traditions. That we need a church or temple is one thing. That charity must be personally performed is another. That mindfulness is necessary for the many is yet another, but the cancer upon mankind that is abrahamism must end forever as the most evil lie ever invented.

  • “How Do You Verify Truth?” (You Don’t)

    —“How do you verify truth?”— Verification is a method of falsification not a means of identifying truth. No matter how many excuses you make (justifications) that does not provide us with confidence of truth. Instead…. Survival, not Proof. You eliminate all falsehoods, and what remains is a truth candidate. You eliminate all falsehoods by attempting to falsify each dimension of actionable reality. And you do so to defend against fictionalisms (lies).

    • Identity (categorical consistency)
    • Logical (internal consistency)
    • Empirical (external correspondence)
    • Operational (existential possibility)
    • Rational (rational choice)
    • Reciprocal (reciprocally rational)
    • Complete (scope, limits, and parsimony)
    • Coherent (across all these tests)
    • Warranty (warranty of having performed these tests).

    If all premises and arguments pass these attempts at falsification one may have a truth candidate. Otherwise one does not. This is as certain as the laws of physics, mathematics, and logic. It is very hard for a statement to survive these tests, to give that testimony, and to warranty it.

  • “How Do You Verify Truth?” (You Don’t)

    —“How do you verify truth?”— Verification is a method of falsification not a means of identifying truth. No matter how many excuses you make (justifications) that does not provide us with confidence of truth. Instead…. Survival, not Proof. You eliminate all falsehoods, and what remains is a truth candidate. You eliminate all falsehoods by attempting to falsify each dimension of actionable reality. And you do so to defend against fictionalisms (lies).

    • Identity (categorical consistency)
    • Logical (internal consistency)
    • Empirical (external correspondence)
    • Operational (existential possibility)
    • Rational (rational choice)
    • Reciprocal (reciprocally rational)
    • Complete (scope, limits, and parsimony)
    • Coherent (across all these tests)
    • Warranty (warranty of having performed these tests).

    If all premises and arguments pass these attempts at falsification one may have a truth candidate. Otherwise one does not. This is as certain as the laws of physics, mathematics, and logic. It is very hard for a statement to survive these tests, to give that testimony, and to warranty it.

  • “How do you verify truth?”— Verification is a method of falsification not a me

    —“How do you verify truth?”—

    Verification is a method of falsification not a means of identifying truth. No matter how many excuses you make (justifications) that does not provide us with confidence of truth.

    Instead….

    You eliminate all falsehoods, and what remains is a truth candidate. You eliminate all falsehoods by attempting to falsify each dimension of actionable reality. And you do so to defend against fictionalisms (lies).

    Identity (categorical consistency)

    Logical (internal consistency)

    Empirical (external correspondence)

    Operational (existential possibility)

    Rational (rational choice)

    Reciprocal (reciprocally rational)

    Complete (scope, limits, and parsimony)

    Coherent (across all these tests)

    Warranty (warranty of having performed these tests).

    If all premises and arguments pass these attempts at falsification one may have a truth candidate. Otherwise one does not.

    This is as certain as the laws of physics, mathematics, and logic.

    It is very hard for a statement to survive these tests, to give that testimony, and to warranty it.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-30 09:53:00 UTC

  • The problem in discourse is very rarely intelligence. Its either intellectual ho

    The problem in discourse is very rarely intelligence. Its either intellectual honesty, lack of agency, or both.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-30 09:40:00 UTC

  • WHAT IS MY ENDGAME? —“What is your endgame?”— A Christian Believer I underst

    WHAT IS MY ENDGAME?

    —“What is your endgame?”— A Christian Believer

    I understand that believers are non rational, and un-persuadable, and over invested in a network of falsehoods, and so believers will not change except to follow an even larger and safer herd.

    So my objective is to use arguments to search for people in the herd who know that the mythos is false, but want a new herd to join.

    So I state my arguments and avoid engaging in abrahamic sophisms, and then insult those who make them to deprive them of their attempt to gain confidence and signals from their denials.

    My endgame is the completion of the transformation of germanicized christianity to natural law and reciprocity, completely laundered of sophism(abrahamism), superstition, mysticism, magic, falsehoods, and lies.

    Truth is enough.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-30 09:33:00 UTC