Theme: Truth

  • A Thing is Demonstrated not Claimed. Ergo, yes false.

    —Christianity is Not ‘false’, just figurative. Not literal. John Warner Mathisen has shown that the stories of the worlds religions are figurative stories(myths) describing the constellations of the night sky. This understanding is called Astro-Theology.”— A Friend Correct in their origin, but two problems with that presumption: 1) A statement is figurative if used figuratively (meaning) and false if used argumentatively (truth). How are the jewish, christian, and islamic statements used? Figuratively (analogically) or argumentatively (persuasively)? In other words, how something is used determines its constitution. There is very little evidence it was used figuratively. Especially given the doubling down by fundamentalists after the empirical, scientific, and technological revolutions. 2) The content of those statements is true if the means produce the promised or even beneficial ends. The statements are false if the means do not produce promised or beneficial ends. Judaism contributed nothing to humanity despite the most educated population in caucasia. Christianity destroyed the aristocracy of the roman world just as it was designed to do. Islam destroyed the great civilizations of the ancient world. And together these three religions ushered in 1B deaths, and a thousand year dark age we have spent the last five hundred years trying to escape – with christianity dying off, but judaism and islam still working diligently to destroy western civilization, with only the chinese, japanese, and koreans holding out. So The statements were and are not acted upon as figurative (analogies, myths) but wisdom, law, and civilizational objective. The outcome is not paradise in the afterlife, or under the pseudoscientific version of judaism (Marxism), christianity (libertarianism), Islam (neo-conservatism), prosperity and peace in this world. These three religions – all variations on abrahamism whether ancient semitic judaism, christianity, and islam, or modern marxism, feminism, and postmodernism – designed by intent to destroy “critique” the great civilizations by weaponizing the female competitive strategy of undermining and reputation destruction by disapproval, shaming, ridicule, gossip, and rallying, and doing so by taking advantage of the means of communication and immigration and publication created in the ancient world and the modern. The are not just false in statement, false in promise, but malicious in intent.

  • A Thing is Demonstrated not Claimed. Ergo, yes false.

    —Christianity is Not ‘false’, just figurative. Not literal. John Warner Mathisen has shown that the stories of the worlds religions are figurative stories(myths) describing the constellations of the night sky. This understanding is called Astro-Theology.”— A Friend Correct in their origin, but two problems with that presumption: 1) A statement is figurative if used figuratively (meaning) and false if used argumentatively (truth). How are the jewish, christian, and islamic statements used? Figuratively (analogically) or argumentatively (persuasively)? In other words, how something is used determines its constitution. There is very little evidence it was used figuratively. Especially given the doubling down by fundamentalists after the empirical, scientific, and technological revolutions. 2) The content of those statements is true if the means produce the promised or even beneficial ends. The statements are false if the means do not produce promised or beneficial ends. Judaism contributed nothing to humanity despite the most educated population in caucasia. Christianity destroyed the aristocracy of the roman world just as it was designed to do. Islam destroyed the great civilizations of the ancient world. And together these three religions ushered in 1B deaths, and a thousand year dark age we have spent the last five hundred years trying to escape – with christianity dying off, but judaism and islam still working diligently to destroy western civilization, with only the chinese, japanese, and koreans holding out. So The statements were and are not acted upon as figurative (analogies, myths) but wisdom, law, and civilizational objective. The outcome is not paradise in the afterlife, or under the pseudoscientific version of judaism (Marxism), christianity (libertarianism), Islam (neo-conservatism), prosperity and peace in this world. These three religions – all variations on abrahamism whether ancient semitic judaism, christianity, and islam, or modern marxism, feminism, and postmodernism – designed by intent to destroy “critique” the great civilizations by weaponizing the female competitive strategy of undermining and reputation destruction by disapproval, shaming, ridicule, gossip, and rallying, and doing so by taking advantage of the means of communication and immigration and publication created in the ancient world and the modern. The are not just false in statement, false in promise, but malicious in intent.

  • “Not an argument. I don’t issue opinions, I construct arguments. Arguments requi

    —“Not an argument. I don’t issue opinions, I construct arguments. Arguments require refutations. Schoolgirls engage in disapproval, rallying, shaming, gossip and reputation destruction: that is the socially dysfunctional female method of violence.”—

  • “Not an argument. I don’t issue opinions, I construct arguments. Arguments requi

    —“Not an argument. I don’t issue opinions, I construct arguments. Arguments require refutations. Schoolgirls engage in disapproval, rallying, shaming, gossip and reputation destruction: that is the socially dysfunctional female method of violence.”—

  • How Desperately Addicts Seek to Preserve their Lies.

    I engage in science and law, [You] conflate philosophizing (reasoning independent of falsification) with science (reason dependent upon falsification) and you conflate testimony which one must warranty with threat of punishment with self reporting which one does not. THAT IS PILPUL. “Excuse Making” THE SIMPLE ANSWER: Religion: what we can get away with? (mysticism), Philosophy: what I can get away with? (sophism), -vs- Science: What we can’t get away with (diligence and warranty). Law: What you can’t get away with (liability). Pseudorationalisms: Astrology, Theology, Numerology, Philosophy, Pilpul, Critique. -vs- Sciences: History, Economics, Accounting, Law, Science, Mathematics, logic (proper). How desperately addicts seek to preserve their lies.

  • “Not an argument. I don’t issue opinions, I construct arguments. Arguments requi

    —“Not an argument. I don’t issue opinions, I construct arguments. Arguments require refutations. Schoolgirls engage in disapproval, rallying, shaming, gossip and reputation destruction: that is the socially dysfunctional female method of violence.”—


    Source date (UTC): 2018-09-01 21:03:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1035996691642687490

  • Not an argument. I don’t issue opinions, I construct arguments. Arguments requir

    Not an argument. I don’t issue opinions, I construct arguments. Arguments require refutations. Schoolgirls engage in disapproval, rallying, shaming, gossip and reputation destruction: that is the socially dysfunctional female method of violence.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-09-01 21:03:15 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1035996529356619776

    Reply addressees: @Connecticutting

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1035953364658540545


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1035953364658540545

  • “Not an argument. I don’t issue opinions, I construct arguments. Arguments requi

    —“Not an argument. I don’t issue opinions, I construct arguments. Arguments require refutations. Schoolgirls engage in disapproval, rallying, shaming, gossip and reputation destruction: that is the socially dysfunctional female method of violence.”—


    Source date (UTC): 2018-09-01 17:03:00 UTC

  • My answer to What BNBR-compatible, anti-censorship rules should Quora implement

    My answer to What BNBR-compatible, anti-censorship rules should Quora implement to prevent biased moderators from silencing views they oppose? https://www.quora.com/What-BNBR-compatible-anti-censorship-rules-should-Quora-implement-to-prevent-biased-moderators-from-silencing-views-they-oppose/answer/Curt-Doolittle?srid=u4Qv


    Source date (UTC): 2018-09-01 12:52:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1035873078562185216

  • Um. You use the term ‘valid’ when you mean ‘functional’ or ‘successful’. Validit

    Um. You use the term ‘valid’ when you mean ‘functional’ or ‘successful’. Validity in general is an iffy word, and certainly iffy when applied outside of its domain. 😉 But yes it is a successful strategy. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2018-09-01 12:31:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1035867832058298369

    Reply addressees: @xmjEE

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1035859683976912896


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1035859683976912896