October 18th, 2018 10:22 AM EVOLUTIONARY SPECTRUM: LITERARY, EMPIRICAL, AND SCIENTIFIC CONSERVATIVE AUTHORS [P]ropertarianism (law of cooperation) is a proof system (logic of falsification) for all cognitive dimensions, and survives falsification in all cognitively possible dimensions (science). Once you have the proof system (tests of falsification), ‘experiential stories’ and ‘opinions’ can be tested. In other words, it’s one thing to have other author’s options and another to show that they are TRUE. So It’s possible to show that the LITERARY conservatives of the Continental Tradition (secular theology) Nietzsche, Evola, Kuhnelt-Leddhin, Stirner, Kirk , Spengler and the EMPIRICAL conservatives (Social Science) Locke, Hume, Smith, Hamilton, Burke, Spencer, et all, were right. But it required SCIENTIFIC conservativism (Hayek, Doolittle) to explain WHY.
Theme: Truth
-
The ineffable is that which one is simply to ignorant to explain. There is nothi
The ineffable is that which one is simply to ignorant to explain. There is nothing that is not explicable with the knowledge to do so.
People use such terms to retain self image and status despite their ignorance.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-18 16:22:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1052958085784965120
-
The ineffable is that which one is simply to ignorant to explain. There is nothi
The ineffable is that which one is simply to ignorant to explain. There is nothing that is not explicable with the knowledge to do so.
People use such terms to retain self image and status despite their ignorance.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-18 12:22:00 UTC
-
THE MARKET COMPETITION BETWEEN MEANING AND TRUTH Education: the market competiti
THE MARKET COMPETITION BETWEEN MEANING AND TRUTH
Education: the market competition between:
…. POSITIVA: MEANING: Literature, Myth, Parable – The act of Generating constant relations, and The Promise of Reward.
…. -vs-
…. NEGATIVA: TRUTH: History, Law, Science, Mathematics – Falsify (test) constant relations: The act of Performing Due Diligence against ignorance, error, bias, and deceit and The Warranty (Promise) of Truth (non-falsehood).
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-18 10:53:00 UTC
-
EVOLUTIONARY SPECTRUM: LITERARY, EMPIRICAL, AND SCIENTIFIC CONSERVATIVE AUTHORS
EVOLUTIONARY SPECTRUM: LITERARY, EMPIRICAL, AND SCIENTIFIC CONSERVATIVE AUTHORS
Propertarianism (law of cooperation) is a proof system (logic of falsification) for all cognitive dimensions, and survives falsification in all cognitively possible dimensions (science).
Once you have the proof system (tests of falsification), ‘experiential stories’ and ‘opinions’ can be tested.
In other words, it’s one thing to have other author’s options and another to show that they are TRUE.
So It’s possible to show that the LITERARY conservatives of the Continental Tradition (secular theology) Nietzsche, Evola, Kuhnelt-Leddhin, Stirner, Kirk , Spengler and the EMPIRICAL conservatives (Social Science) Locke, Hume, Smith, Hamilton, Burke, Spencer, et all, were right.
But it required SCIENTIFIC conservativism (Hayek, Doolittle) to explain WHY.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-18 10:22:00 UTC
-
#Facebook The reason Mark will lose his role as Chairman (eventually) is because
#Facebook The reason Mark will lose his role as Chairman (eventually) is because he has a resistance to transparency and truth – and always has had. Something which is advantageous in entrepreneurship and disadvantageous in stewardship of capital, norms, and laws.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-17 21:25:11 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1052671893466169348
-
What Are You Measuring?
October 17th, 20 WHAT ARE YOU MEASURING?FEELS (immediate experience) or REALS (consequences)? [S]elf Delusion feels good to the Faithful. Drugs feel good to the drug user. Stealing feels good to the thief. Murder feels good to the murderer. Just about anything we evolve a moral disposition against feelsgood. That’s why we limit it.
-
What Are You Measuring?
October 17th, 20 WHAT ARE YOU MEASURING?FEELS (immediate experience) or REALS (consequences)? [S]elf Delusion feels good to the Faithful. Drugs feel good to the drug user. Stealing feels good to the thief. Murder feels good to the murderer. Just about anything we evolve a moral disposition against feelsgood. That’s why we limit it.
-
Solving Religion: The Ultimate Test of Agency
October 17th, 2018 11:42 AM SOLVING RELIGION: THE ULTIMATE TEST OF AGENCY [S]olving religion was the hardest problem. Truth was trivial by comparison. The reason being that we are less invested in truth (reason) than we are in intuitions (training). I solved religion. The question is, what can be done about it for the masses, when the purpose of faith is to circumvent reason and to relieve the individual of all sorts of calculation, particularly STATUS (self image), which is the human’s instinctual accounting system. So, people malinvest in religions (wisdom narratives) for the purpose of cognitive and signaling discounts, and as such they defend their malinvestments like they defend all forms of investment (property). Hence why religion is the ultimate test of Agency.
-
Solving Religion: The Ultimate Test of Agency
October 17th, 2018 11:42 AM SOLVING RELIGION: THE ULTIMATE TEST OF AGENCY [S]olving religion was the hardest problem. Truth was trivial by comparison. The reason being that we are less invested in truth (reason) than we are in intuitions (training). I solved religion. The question is, what can be done about it for the masses, when the purpose of faith is to circumvent reason and to relieve the individual of all sorts of calculation, particularly STATUS (self image), which is the human’s instinctual accounting system. So, people malinvest in religions (wisdom narratives) for the purpose of cognitive and signaling discounts, and as such they defend their malinvestments like they defend all forms of investment (property). Hence why religion is the ultimate test of Agency.