(FB 1540566639 Timestamp) REMINDER: [H]onestly. I deal with history, law, economics, science, logic, mathematics and scientists. I don’t have any respect for ‘philosophers’ in general, and none at all for continentals, who I see as idealist versions of abrahamic/islamist supernaturalists employing sentimental sophisms rather than sentimental supernatural fictionalisms. Sophist, Pseudoscientific, and Supernatural Wisdom literature exists as a competitor to law and science by creating resistance movements against adaptation by enforced ignorance and conformity. I write in what I undrestand is the LAW, which means testimony (measurements) in metaphysics, psychology, social science, which means the end of philosophy as anything other than choice of preference and good FROM the findings of LAW (Science and Testimony). In other words, it is my intention to exterminate philosophy (from the public sphere) as a discipline with LAW just as we exterminated religious theology (from the public sphere) with Physical Science. So I write in law, science, and logic in the structure (outline) of aristotelian philosophy for the purpose of destroying the (continental) cancer of ‘philosophy’ that is nothing but a set of sophomoric and pseudoscientific and in some cases (Evola) occult, drivel preventing us from taking action to impose LAW upon those who would use the same techniques as philosophers and theologians and pseudoscientists, to return us to the Abrahamic Dark Ages of delusionary ignorance.
Theme: Truth
-
I don’t have respect for ‘philosophers’
(FB 1540566639 Timestamp) REMINDER: [H]onestly. I deal with history, law, economics, science, logic, mathematics and scientists. I don’t have any respect for ‘philosophers’ in general, and none at all for continentals, who I see as idealist versions of abrahamic/islamist supernaturalists employing sentimental sophisms rather than sentimental supernatural fictionalisms. Sophist, Pseudoscientific, and Supernatural Wisdom literature exists as a competitor to law and science by creating resistance movements against adaptation by enforced ignorance and conformity. I write in what I undrestand is the LAW, which means testimony (measurements) in metaphysics, psychology, social science, which means the end of philosophy as anything other than choice of preference and good FROM the findings of LAW (Science and Testimony). In other words, it is my intention to exterminate philosophy (from the public sphere) as a discipline with LAW just as we exterminated religious theology (from the public sphere) with Physical Science. So I write in law, science, and logic in the structure (outline) of aristotelian philosophy for the purpose of destroying the (continental) cancer of ‘philosophy’ that is nothing but a set of sophomoric and pseudoscientific and in some cases (Evola) occult, drivel preventing us from taking action to impose LAW upon those who would use the same techniques as philosophers and theologians and pseudoscientists, to return us to the Abrahamic Dark Ages of delusionary ignorance.
-
REMINDER: Honestly. I deal with history, law, economics, science, logic, mathema
REMINDER:
Honestly. I deal with history, law, economics, science, logic, mathematics and scientists.
I don’t have any respect for ‘philosophers’ in general, and none at all for continentals, who I see as idealist versions of abrahamic/islamist supernaturalists employing sentimental sophisms rather than sentimental supernatural fictionalisms.
Sophist, Pseudoscientific, and Supernatural Wisdom literature exists as a competitor to law and science by creating resistance movements against adaptation by enforced ignorance and conformity.
I write in what I undrestand is the LAW, which means testimony (measurements) in metaphysics, psychology, social science, which means the end of philosophy as anything other than choice of preference and good FROM the findings of LAW (Science and Testimony).
In other words, it is my intention to exterminate philosophy (from the public sphere) as a discipline with LAW just as we exterminated religious theology (from the public sphere) with Physical Science.
So I write in law, science, and logic in the structure (outline) of aristotelian philosophy for the purpose of destroying the (continental) cancer of ‘philosophy’ that is nothing but a set of sophomoric and pseudoscientific and in some cases (Evola) occult, drivel preventing us from taking action to impose LAW upon those who would use the same techniques as philosophers and theologians and pseudoscientists, to return us to the Abrahamic Dark Ages of delusionary ignorance.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-26 11:10:00 UTC
-
GROKKING “ELDERS OF THE BLACK SUN” FRAME OF ARGUMENT. —“( When we say ‘Traditi
GROKKING “ELDERS OF THE BLACK SUN” FRAME OF ARGUMENT.
—“(
When we say ‘Tradition’ we are using it as a noun, a synonym to ‘Perennial Wisdom’) – a metaphysical claim to Truth.
See: Perennial philosophy – Wikipedia
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perennial_philosophy
Specifically of the Traditionalist School (which purges the New Agey bs)
See: Traditionalist School – Wikipedia
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Traditionalist_School
)”— Elders of the Black Sun 3
So you mean Wisdom (evidence of survival in use of prolongation of a group evolutionary strategy: ie Peterson’s ‘Darwinian Truth’ ) as an equivalent to Truth (testimony that is consistent, correspondent, coherent, operational, existentially possible, complete), independent of preference or good. And you mean Wisdom Literature rather than Scientific (Correspondent) Description.
And which Tradition are you referring to? French, Authoritarian, Supernatural, or Anglo, Contractual, Real?
I think you mean French, Authoritarian, Universal, and Supernatural, or the German restatement of Authoritarian, National, and Ideal(imaginary). But you don’t mean Anglo, Contractual, and Real (Science).
Ok… so yes, you are speaking in Postmodern (anti-scientific, anti-real, anti-darwinian) school of the French and Italian catholic reformists: Traditionalist School.
And, yes, you are relying on Perennialism (universalism, and eternalism of the content of the wisdom literature developed under agrarianism and pastoralism, but abandoned under industrialism.)
So, Continental (Secular Catholic), Postmodern (anti-realist, anti-scientific), literature and intutionism (anti-calculation).
And yes, this is the secularization of catholic authoritarian conformity of the laboring classes who cannot afford to learn, or are unable to learn, and then make use of calculation and computation for the purpose of competitive evolution, and so rely on sentimental stagnation as a resistance movement.
Ok. I think I get it.
Well, what I really like is the depth you’re going into. Good work.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-26 10:31:00 UTC
-
Actually, no. It requires understanding (scientifically) the vocabular, grammar,
Actually, no. It requires understanding (scientifically) the vocabular, grammar, arguments, correspondence, non-correspondence, and incentive given the available options. In other words: The Science (Truth) of what is argued, not the MEANING.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-25 23:29:01 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1055602157213442048
Reply addressees: @PhilosophyCuck @MrKennan1948 @WorMartiN
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1055558906066415616
IN REPLY TO:
@Jonas_Ceika
@curtdoolittle @MrKennan1948 @WorMartiN Putting forth an account of developments in philosophy requires actually understanding the debates within it.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1055558906066415616
-
Or in other words, don’t seek, like a numerologist, palm reader, tarot card read
Or in other words, don’t seek, like a numerologist, palm reader, tarot card reader, scriptural interpreter, rabbi or theologian, to find excuses to justify your prior (pilpul), or construct straw man arguments (critique), in what is ordinary, descriptive, or scientific language.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-25 21:44:24 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1055575829810417664
Reply addressees: @PhilosophyCuck @MrKennan1948 @WorMartiN
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1055556675585875968
IN REPLY TO:
@Jonas_Ceika
@MrKennan1948 @curtdoolittle @WorMartiN The language is very familiar to me. What confuses me is the fact that it’s completely detached from any of my criticisms on the topic.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1055556675585875968
-
Cont. 6) And this is what separates Mythology (supernatural or supernormal wisdo
Cont. 6) And this is what separates Mythology (supernatural or supernormal wisdom literature), from Philosophical (sophomoric and justificationary) literature, from Critique (straw manning defense of priors), from Law, economics, science, and mathematics.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-25 21:17:36 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1055569087336771585
Reply addressees: @PhilosophyCuck @MrKennan1948 @WorMartiN
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1055556675585875968
IN REPLY TO:
@Jonas_Ceika
@MrKennan1948 @curtdoolittle @WorMartiN The language is very familiar to me. What confuses me is the fact that it’s completely detached from any of my criticisms on the topic.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1055556675585875968
-
Cont. 4) Subjectively stated without any basis whatsoever –“Really good books (
Cont. 4) Subjectively stated without any basis whatsoever –“Really good books (he means ‘wisdom literature’) do not cut off interpretation”—. Actually that is exactly what they do. Provide scientific explanation that is then replaced by MORE parsimony (less interpretation).
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-25 21:14:01 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1055568186542907392
Reply addressees: @PhilosophyCuck @MrKennan1948 @WorMartiN
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1055556675585875968
IN REPLY TO:
@Jonas_Ceika
@MrKennan1948 @curtdoolittle @WorMartiN The language is very familiar to me. What confuses me is the fact that it’s completely detached from any of my criticisms on the topic.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1055556675585875968
-
Cont. 3) By attempting to construct yet another set of fictions, that while inte
Cont. 3) By attempting to construct yet another set of fictions, that while internally consistent with experience, were not externally consistent with the findings of law, economics, and science: That western civ’s tradition(success) is systemically empirical and eugenic.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-25 21:11:15 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1055567490649088000
Reply addressees: @PhilosophyCuck @MrKennan1948 @WorMartiN
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1055556675585875968
IN REPLY TO:
@Jonas_Ceika
@MrKennan1948 @curtdoolittle @WorMartiN The language is very familiar to me. What confuses me is the fact that it’s completely detached from any of my criticisms on the topic.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1055556675585875968
-
Examples: —“…rigorous interpretation of the text and..”— This is Pilpul (t
Examples: —“…rigorous interpretation of the text and..”— This is Pilpul (textual justificationism) which, instead of terms, sentences, and phrases in the context of the author’s theory, and whether that theory corresponds to reality – how to find what is not there: Pilpul.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-25 20:59:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1055564588585021442
Reply addressees: @PhilosophyCuck @MrKennan1948 @WorMartiN
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1055556675585875968
IN REPLY TO:
@Jonas_Ceika
@MrKennan1948 @curtdoolittle @WorMartiN The language is very familiar to me. What confuses me is the fact that it’s completely detached from any of my criticisms on the topic.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1055556675585875968