Theme: Truth

  • “What is the story with your father and the council?”– Steven Jackson I don’t h

    —“What is the story with your father and the council?”– Steven Jackson

    I don’t have a lot good to say about my father but he was smart, worked very hard, and would never lie ever. (He’d come very close to killing you for even suggesting it.)

    I used to go to town council meetings and learn how ‘government was done’. Stupid shit like ‘this sidewalk is expensive’. Ordinary stuff.

    The newspaper would regularly twist his words out of context in order to imply the direct opposite of what he said.

    I have vivid memories of lying on the carpet in the living room reading the newspaper saying “I was there. That is not what happened.” And my father saying “news is a best nothing but fictional entertainment, and at worst nothing but lies. Never believe a word they say”.

    So I get into college and it’s a saturday and I’m wearing faded jeans with holes in them, and a faded blue chamois shirt, and white sneakers, and walking around campus because I did too much writing already and need a break. It’s a rainy day. i walk into the student union, and someone has sponsored this absurd pinball machine where the ball is the size of a softball. So I walk up to this thing and put a quarter in it and try it.

    Out of nowhere the local news crew comes up and asks if they can film me. I am not and never have been someone who likes public attention, but I said yes. The women then proceeded to start a dozen takes trying to get me to say that I had nothing better to do than play pinball in university. And so I finally said – I’m not going to make a fool of myself. I told you already, that I’m taking a walk because I’ve done too much work already, and this is just something interesting because it’s new.” They aired some choppy thing without me responding that she suggested the same nonsense.

    I was walking down the street in west hartford just after I had purchased a local business. Some reporter stopped me for one of those 60 second sets of questions. They tried multiple times to force me to say other than what I’d said: that the problem was that hartford had imported too many black families and that the north end in particular was a no-go zone even for the FBI. (This was common knowledge). They did not air my statement.

    I give press releases all the time. Between the inflation by the marketers, the PR firm, and the press you’d think I claimed I went to Harvard and invented the light bulb.

    I stopped giving interviews to the press because you simply can’t trust them to get anything right that doesn’t fit their institutional narrative.

    Every journalist is a professional gossip and nothing more. The same is true for every social scientists, and everyone in the non-stem academy.

    And you wonder why I want to legislate TRUTH? That’s why.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-14 13:27:00 UTC

  • NO JORDAN PETERSON – NO MORE LIES No, Jordan, you’re just comfortable tolerating

    NO JORDAN PETERSON – NO MORE LIES

    No, Jordan, you’re just comfortable tolerating White Lies [1]. You are comfortable with white lies because white lies are how we provide solace to those who are suffering when we cannot ,or cannot afford to, or will not, take the actions necessary to end that suffering.

    Your work as a therapist could involve cognitive behavioral therapy. It does involve suggestion by the use of narration, thereby circumventing the trauma, analysis, and self criticism all of us make use of.

    But then you take this means of suggestion from the realm of interpersonal circumvention of trauma so that we might offer education by suggestion, and attempt to scale it to education.

    And this is where your white lies become ordinary lies, which you justify (obscure) with the lie of conflating the truth with the good and the preferable. There is no such thing as ‘darwinian truth’. There is only utility that satisfies a personal good, or a personal preference. We can weave a set of these utilities, like a story, into a justificationary network, that provides us with defense against our fears and insecurities – rather than training us out of fear and insecurity. But these are just another network of white lies.

    Judaism, Christianity, Islam and Buddhism are constructed of little other than these comforting white lies. Stoicism in the form of ritual self authoring(mindfulness) and ritual ancestor worship(Thanks), ritual community worship(thanks), and ritual nature worship(thanks) do nothing other than perform cognitive behavioral therapy that gives us confidence to act in a kaleidic universe the causal density of which is beyond our comprehension.

    So, Even today you maintain your market position with white lies. And you selectively argue with (a) scientific results, (b) clinical example, (c) historical example, and lastly (d) parables constructed of those white lies.

    And while in therapy, absent chemical assistance necessary to provide distance between cognition and trauma, fear, and insecurity, white lies allow us to operate by suggestion. Such lies do not scale.

    There are 1B dead between old world abrahamism( judaism, christianity, islam), and new world abrahamism (marxism, postmodernism, and feminism) and a thousand year dark age some of us are still trying to drag our civilization out of.

    And abrahamism consists of what appear to be white lies: False promise of the impossible, and destructive if successful, straw man criticism of the opposition, a vast network of lies in supernatural (religious), pseudoscientific (feminism, marxism, freudianism, boasianism, cantoriansim, messianism, keynesianism and mathematical platonism), sophist (postmodernism) prose, defended not by rational, operational, and scientific argument, but where argument is avoided by disapproval, shaming, ridicule, rallying, gossip, undermining, and reputation destruction on the personal, social, political, and intellectual scales.

    So no. There is no ‘excuse’ (justification) for white lies outside of catastrophic loss, therapy, injury, sick bed, and death bed. There is only one truthful definition of truth: that which is decidable independent of individual comprehension, preference, or collective good.

    And worse, it is through the scale of white lies that we have endured and still endure, a dark age of ignorance, and the billion lives loss to the conflicts created by defense of lies and offence with lies.

    NO MORE LIES.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine

    [1] white lie[comfort] > grey lie[avoidance] > black lie[predation] > ‘Evil'(harm for harm’s sake)


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-14 12:44:00 UTC

  • IF IT WAS COMMON SENSE WE WOULDN’T NEED THE WHITE LAW —“I follow Curt, but mos

    IF IT WAS COMMON SENSE WE WOULDN’T NEED THE WHITE LAW

    —“I follow Curt, but most of what he’s says seems like common sense.”— A Friend (from Chat)

    So yes. It is f–cking common sense. The difference is that I defend that common sense both logically and scientifically, because what is ‘common sense’ to you ‘is not common’.

    I made a Law of what you consider ‘common sense’. It is that law, the constitution that embodies it, and the logic and science in defense of it, that make it open to utility in persuasion, resistance to falsification, and institutional implementation, rather than simply a difference of moral bias and condition.

    I wrote our law. No one ever did that before. We just ‘do it’. For thousands of years.

    Individual Sovereignty, Truth, Duty (and charity), The Natural law of Reciprocity (Tort), the Sovereignty Judge and the Jury, and markets in everything that result. The Militia of a distributed dictatorship of sovereign men.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-14 12:09:00 UTC

  • Transcendence by Truth is the most intolerant religion of all. … The Most Into

    Transcendence by Truth is the most intolerant religion of all. … The Most Intolerant Wins.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-14 11:51:00 UTC

  • THE NATURAL LAW FUNCTION OF RELIGION —“…error…”— I don’t make errors. It

    THE NATURAL LAW FUNCTION OF RELIGION

    —“…error…”—

    I don’t make errors. It’s my job.

    I run tests. I try to remove all falsehood from all statements. To leave only the truth standing. Because that other than sovereignty, it is western man’s uniqueness: Truth Regardless of the Impact to the self-image(personal), status(social), competence(economic), and dominance(political) hierarchy.

    Now, back to your criticism.

    —“Religion is nothing but education.”–CD

    There is nothing [in your comment] that you have stated that counters this proposition.

    Religion is education. It provides (educates with) narratives of intergenerational transference of mindfulness, codes of conduct(ethics and morals), signaling(social order ), tradition (strategy), and law (property rights and obligations).

    Some religions do this by the abrahamic method of deceit, some do it by the buddhist method, some by the hindu method(s), and some by the ancestor-worship methods. Some by simple folk rituals.

    Some emphasize a way of life (hinduism), some emphasize a way of thought (buddhism and stoicism), and some a ritual (shintoism), and some a cognitive fantasy (abrahamism).

    —“…curt…”—

    Psychologism is always and everywhere false. So the straw man is pointless.

    I am advocating for stoicism (mindfulness by self authoring), ancestor worship (thanks – we have ancestors worthy of it), and nature ‘worship'(celebration), with the ambition of transcendence of man into the gods we have designed (omnipotent, omniscient, omnirational). Not as individuals but as a collective. This provides the spectrum of personal, interpersonal, social, political, and group strategies that all of us appear to need.

    There is nothing in that list that is not both scientifically achievable, fulfilling of behavioral demand, and free of deceits and frauds.

    We know so because all of these have and do exist.

    So if you are invested in a lie – the answer is why? Are you human and capable of choice between truth and lie, or are you still animal and incapable of choice between truth and lie?

    Religion is simply education. Education in the personal, interpersonal, social, political, and strategic by ritual(repetition) practice – like every OTHER thing we learn through repetition. Like how to move our bodies, how to speak, how to socialize, how to read, do math, operate a machine, or compose works of innovative thought.

    I am not anti-religion. Just anti-lies. My religion is Transcendence of man into gods, by the use of Sovereignty, Truth, Duty, Charity, the Natural Law of Reciprocity and the Jury, Markets in everything, producing the most rapid calculation of, and achievement of godhood that is possible for man to perform.

    This religion requires training in mindfulness in the personal, interpersonal, social, political, international realms. In the physical (fitness), mental (mindfulness), social (manners, ethics, morals), calculative (3R’s), economic (job skills), political (laws), strategic (strategy).

    And under my method we return dominance of daily life from the State to the Church, ending the academy, and ending the Cathedral Complex. Creating a single ‘intolerante’ religion (education system). And with it, ending Abrahamism in jewish, christian, and muslim form, as well as Marxist, Postmodern, Feminist form. And with that, end this scam we call democracy which is an excuse to intermediate us from the courts as the means of resolving conflicts both private and common. And restoring rule of law, including houses for the classes to negotiate, and monarchy as judge of last resort, and a universal militia to guarantee all of the above.

    Period.

    There are a few arguments you might raise against me, but you are not able. your life consists of malinvestment in lies that produce ignorance, poverty, and dark ages, and have cost a billion lives.

    There is no better service we can do the world than eliminate abrahamism, for aside from the great plagues there is nothing more horrible in the experience of man.

    Curt Doolittle


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-14 11:02:00 UTC

  • Within the subject of Face vs Truth, what is the difference between Loyalty and

    Within the subject of Face vs Truth, what is the difference between Loyalty and Duty?


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-14 09:15:00 UTC

  • Jonathan: Main differences in ‘Moral Foundations’ across civilizations appear to

    Jonathan: Main differences in ‘Moral Foundations’ across civilizations appear to be (a) Truth regardless of Cost vs Face regardless of Truth, and (b) position on the Family > Clan > Tribe > Nation > Universalist spectrum. Do you plan to extend MF to group differences? @JonHaidt


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-13 15:18:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1073235711069970432

  • SECOND BIT OF CLARITY FOR THE DAY: DIMENSIONS OF DUE DILIGENCE Dimensions of Nec

    SECOND BIT OF CLARITY FOR THE DAY: DIMENSIONS OF DUE DILIGENCE

    Dimensions of Necessary Warranty of Due Diligence:

    + 0 identity

    + 1 internal consistency (logical) (verbal)

    + 2 external correspondence (empirical) (existential)

    + 3 existential possibility (operational) (actionable)

    + 4 rational choice (voluntary and rational) (choice)

    + 5 reciprocity (reciprocally voluntary and rational)(morality)

    —–

    + limits, full accounting, and parsimony (complete)

    —–

    = Coherence (complete consistency)

    (a) I sometimes don’t separate out rational choice and reciprocity and simply use Morality for the combination.

    (b) I sometimes don’t enumerate limits, full accounting, and parsimony, but just use full accounting.

    (c) I sometimes don’t mention coherence because it only seems to confuse people that it’s the consistency across all of the dimensions

    (d )All of these are simply tests of consistency within or across (coherence) dimensions that it is possible for man to test.

    (e) Limits, Full Accounting, Parsimony, are tests of every individual dimension The rest of the tests, only the given dimension.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-13 13:03:00 UTC

  • PROPERTARIANISM CHEAT SHEET (The Cheat Sheet Version of Propertarianism) 0) |THE

    PROPERTARIANISM CHEAT SHEET

    (The Cheat Sheet Version of Propertarianism)

    0) |THE WEST| Transcendence (into Gods) > Agency + (?) > Sovereignty + Reciprocity > Truth + Duty > Natural Law + Jury > Contract + Markets in Everything > Optimum Private + Optimum Commons > Optimum Evolutionary Adaptation to Change |*| Vulnerability to deceit.

    Note: “Gods: Those with Agency: Omnicognizance (reason, OmniIndependence (Emotions, biases), Omniscience (knowledge), Omnipotence (Physical), Immortality (time), Others (Law of Sovereignty+Reciprocity). Note that the russian version does not include reciprocity.”

    1) |MARKETS| Expression > Association > Cooperation > Reproduction > Production > Conflict Resolution (law) > Commons > Polities (order) > (War).

    2) |LAW| Transcendence > Sovereignty + Reciprocity (One Law) > Insurer (Court) (King / Judge of last resort) > The Discovered Law > The Referee (Judge) > The Jury -> The Thang -> The Senate -> { the King/Monarchy, the Senate/Lords(oligarchy) And the House (industry) and the Church (families) and the “those who have only the law to defend them – the underclasses”}.

    3 |PROPERTY IN TOTO| : DEMONSTRATED PROPERTY IN TOTO (Demonstrated Property)

    I. SELF-PROPERTY

    Personal property: “Things an individual has a Monopoly Of Control over the use of.”

    ….a) Physical Body

    ….b) Actions and Time

    ….c) Memories, Concepts and Identities: tools that enable us to plan and act. In the consumer economy this includes brands.

    ….d) Status and Class (mate and relation selection, and reputation.)

    II. PERSONAL PROPERTY

    ….a) Several Property: Those things external to our bodies that we claim a monopoly of control over.

    III. KINSHIP PROPERTY

    ….a) Mates (access to sex/reproduction)

    ….b) Children (genetics)

    ….c) Familial Relations (security)

    ….d) Non-Familial Relations (utility)

    ….e) Consanguineous property (tribal and family ties)

    IV. COOPERATIVE PROPERTY

    ….a) Organizational ties (work)

    ….b) Knowledge ties (skills, crafts)

    V. SHAREHOLDER PROPERTY

    ….a) Shares: Partnership or shareholdership: Recorded And Quantified Shareholder Property (physical shares in a tradable asset)

    VI. COMMON PROPERTY

    ….b) Commons: Unrecorded and Unquantified Shareholder Property (shares in commons)

    ….c) Artificial Property: (property created by fiat agreement) Intellectual Property.

    VII. COMMON INFORMAL INSTITUTIONAL PROPERTY:

    ….a) Informal (Normative) Property: Our norms: manners, ethics, morals, myths, and rituals that consist of our social portfolio and which make our social order possible.

    VIII. COMMON FORMAL INSTITUTIONAL PROPERTY

    ….a) Formal Institutional Property: Formal (Procedural) Institutions: Our institutions: Religion (including the secular religion), Government, Laws.

    4) INSTITUTIONAL PROPERTY RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS

    I. OBLIGATIONS

    1) Non-Imposition :

    (a) Productive,

    (b) Fully informed,

    (c) Warrantied,

    (d) Voluntary Transfer(Exchange) of property-en-toto,

    (e) Free of External Imposition of Costs against others’ Property-in-toto.

    II. RIGHTS

    a) Constituo – Homesteading: Convert into property through bearing a cost of transformation.

    b) Transitus – Transit: passage through 3d space.

    c) Usus – Use: setting up a stall.

    d) Fructus – Fruits: (blackberries, wood, profits)

    e) Mancipio – Emancipation: (sale, transfer)

    f) Abusus – Abuse: (Consumption or Destruction) Opposite of Constituo.

    5) CATEGORIES OF PROPERTY

    I) Non-Property (Bring under total control)

    ….CONTROL: Total Control

    ….PURPOSE: Create Property

    ….YES: Constituo, Transitus, Usus, Fructus, Mancipio, Abusus.

    II) Possession

    III) Consensual Possession

    IV) Normative Possession – “property”

    V) INSTITUTIONAL POSSESSION – “PROPERTY RIGHTS”

    i) Personal (Private) Property (limited control)

    ….PURPOSE: Acquisition Inventory and Consumption

    ….YES: Transitus, Usus, Fructus, Mancipio,

    ….MAYBE: Abusus

    ii) Shareholder (Private) Property (very limited control)

    ….CONTROL: Very Limited Control

    ….PURPOSE: Dividends from Cooperation

    ….YES: Fructus

    ….MAYBE: ?Transitus, ?Usus,?Mancipio,

    ….NO: Abusus

    iii) Common (Public) Property (All Citizen Shareholders)

    ….CONTROL: No control.

    ….PURPOSE: Prohibition on Consumption.

    ….MAYBE: Transitus, Usus, Fructus,

    ….NO: Mancipio, Abusus

    6) |CRIMES| Predation > Parasitism > Free Riding > Conspiracy > War > Evil.

    I – Predation (Physical)-

    Criminal Prohibitions.

    Harm:

    a. Murder

    b. Violence (harm, rape, damage, asymmetry of force)

    c. Theft (asymmetry of control)

    *FREEDOM Achieved Upon Suppression.

    II – Parasitism-

    Unethical Prohibitions.

    Fraud (Informational):

    d. Hazard Production (Baiting, Entrapment), Poisoning the Well (Gossip, Ridicule, Shaming, Rallying, Reputation Destruction, Straw Manning, Heaping of Undue Praise on the undeserving.)

    e. Fraud (false information)

    f. Omission (Omitting information)

    g. Obscurantism (Obscuring information)

    h. Obstruction (Inhibiting someone else’s transaction)

    *ETHICALITY Achieved Upon Suppression.

    III – Free-Riding (Social)-

    Immoral Prohibitions.

    Free Riding (Social):

    i. Profit without contribution to production.

    j. Externalization (externalizing costs of any transaction)

    k. Free Riding (using externalities for self-benefit)

    l. Socializing Losses (externalization to commons)

    m. Privatizing Gains (appropriation of commons)

    *MORALITY Achieved Upon Suppression.

    IV – Political Prohibitions.

    Conspiracy (Political):

    n. Monopoly, Cartel Seeking (or partial monopoly)

    o. Rent Seeking (organizational free riding)

    p. Corruption ( organized rent seeking)

    q. Conspiracy (organized indirect theft)

    r. Extortion (Organized direct theft), Blackmail.

    *LIBERTY Achieved Upon Suppression.

    V – War.

    Military Prohibitions.

    Warfare (Military):

    s. Conversion (Propaganda, Religious or normative theft of norms)

    t. Overbreeding

    u. Immigration. (dilution of norms, institutions, genes)

    v. War (organized violence for the purpose of theft)

    w. Conquest. (reorganization of all property and relations)

    x. Genocide. (extermination of kin and genetic future)

    *SOVEREIGNTY Achieved Upon Suppression.

    VI – Evil

    z. The imposition of costs upon the interests of others without intent or incentive for gain, but for the purpose of causing them loss regardless of one’s gain or loss.

    7) |TRUTHFUL GRAMMARS OF EXPRESSION| Math, Logic, Science, Operations(protocols, processes, recipes), Economics (money, banking, finance, accounting), Law (Natural), History, Literature (including poetry > essay > fiction > mythology).

    8) |DECEITS| failure of due diligence > ignorance > error > bias > wishful thinking > loading > framing > suggestion > obscurantism > fictionalism > denialism > and deceit.

    9) |FICTIONALISMS| Deceit > Sophism > Pseudoscience > Supernaturalism.

    10) |AVOIDANCE| Disapproval > shaming > moralizing > psychologizing > ridicule >rallying > gossiping > undermining > and reputation-destruction. “DSRRGUR”.

    ( Q: James Santagata: What series are you using for This? Because I think you use something shorter and I want to use both short and long versions. I think its GSRM or something like that?)

    11) |ABRAHAMIC GRAMMARS|: Disapproval as substitute for argument > False Promise > Pilpul (sophism) > Critique () > Heaping of Undue Praise, Straw Man Criticism as a Vehicle for Disapproval > Reputation Destruction > Failure to Supply a Competing alternative capable of surviving same criticisms > Authoritarian Conformity,

    12) |ABRAHAMIC EVOLUTION| Abrahamism > (Adding Platonism) > Judaism > Christianity > Islam > (Dark Age Theology) > Marxism > Postmodernism > Feminism > Denialism: “APMPFD”.

    13) |LONG CYCLE OF HISTORY| {MALE EVOLUTIONARY TERRITORIAL: Fast Western > Medium Rational Eastern > Slow Narrative Indian Indian} vs FEMALE DEVOLUTIONARY MIGRATORY: Supernatural Semitic counter-evolutionary strategy. With Africa, Americas and Pacifica Lagging, and (it appears) Australian-NZ regressing.

    14) |ORDER| Need to Acquire Resources > Action to Improve Acquisition > Cooperation to Improve > Opportunity for Parasitism > Incentive for Parasitism > Preserve incentive to cooperate > Prevent disincentives > Punish to create Disincentives > organize to punish to create disincentives.

    THE LAW

    1) Judges are forced to adjudicate between customary law, regulation, and legislation during a period of rapid social, economic, and political upheaval. In science for example, there is no temporal pressure to decide. In conflict there is temporal pressure to decide. The state has taken on the monopoly of the application of violence, and created a monopoly method of dispute resolution (courts), and created a monopoly body by which to adjudicate such conflicts (law, legislation, and regulation.)

    2) There exists only one universal law of human cooperation. We call that law ‘natural law’. That natural law consists in reciprocity. Reciprocity requires satisfaction of the criteria (a) fully informed, (b) productive, (c) warrantied, (d) voluntary transfer, (d) free of imposition of costs upon the interests of others by externality. One can obtain an interest by bearing a cost (performing an improvement) for the purpose of obtaining an interest; and one can have no interest until one has born a cost to obtain such an interest.

    3) This one law (reciprocity) provides decidability independent of opinion, preference, custom, or presumption of good, and is the reason international law is governed by reciprocity it is the only rule that provides reciprocal (equal) incentive against retaliation for the imposition of costs upon one another. Law evolved, from the first record, to the present, for the purpose of preserving the volume, velocity, and returns on cooperation, and preventing cooperation’s opposite: retaliation cycles that throughout history have produced the deleterious effects of feuds.

    4) Customary Law (especially germanic, if not all european) consists of the discovery and accumulation of applications of this law of reciprocity that we call Tort law. Legislation (command) and regulation (prior constraint) have been given the FORCE of LAW by those whose profit interest – either the population (preservation of returns on cooperation) or the territorial rulers (returns from taxation).

    5) The primary function of RULE has been the preservation of cooperation by use of organized violence to suppress impositions of costs upon the investments of others. This is the role of insurer of last resort of Personal Interests.

    6) The primary function of GOVERNMENT has been the construction of commons and the extraordinary returns produced by commons, while insuring those commons from privatization of commons, socialization of losses into the commons, by the organized use of violence. This is the role of insurer of last resort of the Commons.

    7) The primary function of the STATE, particularly with the advent of paper currency, and now fiat (unbacked) currency (our money consists of nothing but shares in the economy) has increasingly evolved to function as the insurer of last resort against the Hazards of the vicissitudes of nature (disasters, tragedies, accidents, disability, health, old age, and even war).

    8) Rights can only exist (a) by reciprocal exchange of the same obligation, and (b) when insured by a third party with sufficient organized violence to insure and reinforce them. Otherwise they are not rights but impositions by means of command. It is correct to say we create a market ‘demand’ natural rights, and we create a market demand for human rights, but those rights do not exist until we organize sufficient violence into roles and institutions to insure those rights: police, sheriffs, soldiery, and judges.

    9) Human rights consist of AMBITIONS that we demand from the Governments of States in order to tolerate their retention of a monopoly of control over a territory. They exist as a postwar attempt to constraint governments to improving their territory, people, and assets by market means, without imposition upon their neighbors. Such rights, likewise, do not exist. But are merely an ambition.

    10) The universal declaration of human rights contains a few provisions that were necessary to obtain the signatures of the then-communist states, that asserted positive rights (obligations to provide for one another without constraint on the reproduction that exhausts the ability to provide for others, and therefore results in the gradual dysgenic decline as we reverse thousands of years of upward redistribution of reproduction back down to the underclasses who are not able to produce sufficient market goods and services to exist without harming the reproduction of the middle and upper classes.) [note: we have reversed the flynn effect and have, even in china, been losing a third of a point of intelligence over a fairly short number of years. The productivity of a people is reducible to the median of the population’s cost of education and training, such that every point below what is today’s 105 and tomorrow’s 110 places an intolerable burden upon the rest of the polity.]

    8) Our American constitution persisted the anglo saxon, germanic, proto-germanic (and possibly proto-indo-european) law of sovereign men limited to acts of reciprocity, and licensed the government to act in their interests to preserve their sovereignty (the original text being ‘life, liberty, property’). Unfortunately at the time the techniques of formal logic, strict constriction from first principles, were not known. We are no longer limited, and there is no reason any and every law cannot be constructed formally from the natural law of reciprocity, producing a complete, consistent, and easily falsifiable body of adjudicatable law. There is no reason any and every act of legislation, and any and every act of regulation, cannot be so constructed. The principle difference under such formal construction is that the one law, discovered application of the one law, regulation to limit hazards of those actions not open to restitution, and CONTRACTS for the production of commons would be consistent, and as such the government could only issue contracts under law, not edicts above that law. (This would destroy the left’s ability to usurp power by democratic means).

    9) The uniqueness of western civilization is reducible to (a) a militia that constitutes the shareholders, (b) individual sovereignty of shareholders, (c) the demand for truth, duty, and reciprocity from one another in mutual insurance of our sovereignty. (d) And sovereignty results in the necessity of markets for association, cooperation, reproduction, production, commons, and polities. (e) such markets, adjudicated by the law of tort, adapt to change faster than all other methods of human organization. (f) it is this rapidity of adaptation and resulting insulation from corruption and rent seeking that made the west develop faster than the rest in both the ancient world and the modern, with the Abrahamic Dark Age of the Jewish, Christian, and Muslim attacks on the great civilizations, providing the only hindrance. Once north sea trade was reestablished, the saxon commercial order constructed in europe, and the atlantic opened to the age of sail, the west was finally, by the age of napoleon, able to return to Roman levels of institutional sophistication, and universal imposition of law. [note that the west had fertile lands and forests but no flood river valleys to concentrate production, concentrate people, and develop taxation. So while the ancient world could form armies by taxation, western people had to form militias that relied on advanced (at the time) technology that required whole families to pay for. These militias (cattle raiders, sea peoples, vikings, pirates, european explorers ) organized expeditions (raids) but did so voluntarily. There was no other means of organizing other than contract. It was this order that led to our law, our debate, our reason, and from there our science and technology. Western excellence is due to our law – which elsewhere is not contract but command.

    10) The progressives lie to mask what is merely theft – they rely on postmodernism (lying by sophistry), and they rely on marxism (pseudoscience) as well as freudian and boazian pseudoscience. So yes, the Progressives (socialists) lie, but the Conservatives (Aristocratics) cannot tell the truth: The truth is quite simple: the reason for the success of western and eastern civilization, and most obviously the ashkenazim, is the upward redistribution of reproduction, and the use of manorialism, taxation, and the vicissitudes of nature to limit the reproduction of the underclass until such point that surpluses are sufficient to continually increase the standard of living through continuous market competition and innovation. Man was not oppressed. The man self domesticated through the same process he used for plants and animals: breeding the best and culling the rest. This is the dirty secret of civilizations.

    11) Sovereignty, Truth, Duty, and Reciprocity produce markets, and markets are eugenic. They are just a peaceful form of eugenics rather than war, enslavement, enserfment. By use of Sovereignty, Truth, Duty, Reciprocity, and Markets western man in the ancient world, and in the modern, dragged humanity kicking and screaming out of ignorance, superstition, hard labor, poverty, starvation, infant mortality, early death,

    12) The chinese are not so inhibited as we are. they do not care about markets other than in their ability to preserve their racially homogenous polity, and return themselves to position of world power to do so. They are actively researching methods of direct improvement while event their one child policy did not help the ongoing decline in the distribution of intelligence. We are doing the opposite, which is undermining the very reason for our evolutionary success, ad the means by which we dragged mankind out of darkness, and we are doing it through immigration of those very peoples who we have spent thousands of years eliminating from our polities. As far as I know anglicans and ashkenazim remain at parity, but the anglos otherwise have lost a full standard deviation or more since the beginning of the industrial revolution. Even the Norwegians are in distributional decline.

    13) The most profitable action any polity can take is to institutionalize benevolent eugenics, and that is to pay the underclasses not to reproduce, and to limit all immigration to skilled professionals, and to push the young and old into the labor force in the less demanding occupations. This is the lesson of our experiment with universal democracy and marxist-postmodernist globalism: dramatic reversal of centuries of civic improvement. At present only the east asians are willing to pay the costs of retaining their accumulated achievements. The eugenicists were right and in retrospect it appears that the Boas, Marx, Freud, Frankfurt, and French Postmodern movements were but reactions against Darwin, Maxwell, Menger, Spencer, and Nietzsche. And the entire postwar period has been nothing but a pseudoscientific and pseudo-rational attack on western civilization – an effort to repeat the destruction of the civilizations of the ancient world by the same means – false promises. This time with pseudoscience and pseudo-rational sophisms using the major media instead of supernatural sophisms using roman roads and greek writing.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-13 09:53:00 UTC

  • A LITTLE INCREASED PRECISION ON MY USE OF ‘AGENCY’ I preserve both real and idea

    A LITTLE INCREASED PRECISION ON MY USE OF ‘AGENCY’

    I preserve both real and ideal definitions of truth, and so the source of confusion is my deflation of truth into real and ideal terms (truthfulness, and truth proper/ideal truth) and not doing so with agency (agency in fact, and ideal agency) and assuming the reader understands.

    Second, part of the reason i use the term is to reverse its emphasis on the blame of others(structure) vs the self (mindfulness).

    And that is because I include reciprocity which includes markets in everything. Which is perfect ‘structure’.

    So perfect knowledge, perfect action, within limits of reciprocity (perfect structure) is commensurable with perfect testimony (truth proper/ideal truth).

    So I don’t have a term for agency as you most it (possible range of production), instead of the limit of production. Whereas with truthful and truth i have a term for both the possible range of production, and the limit of production.

    Agency —————————————————>

    Good —————————————————–>

    Honest->Truthful(real)->True(Ideal)->True(Analytic)->Taut.->

    Agency(limit) = Omniscience(knowledge), +Omnicognizance(Reason), +Omnipotence(Action), within +Reciprocity(Condition)

    |Agency| Knowledge->Reason->Action->Condition.

    Thanks Bill Joslin for helping me with this oversight.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-13 09:08:00 UTC