Curt Doolittle

Theme: Truth

  • “Logic and definitions are obviously tools of oppression invented by white heter

    —“Logic and definitions are obviously tools of oppression invented by white hetero normative cis males”—Greg Hamilton

    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-10 18:07:10 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1083425029499641861

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/49271310_10156907624222264_290277604

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/49271310_10156907624222264_290277604

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/49271310_10156907624222264_2902776049551015936_o_10156907624217264.jpg HUMOR AND TRUTH FROM /POL. ;)Richard HallHe’s not wrong though…Jan 10, 2019, 1:45 PMDavid McCarthyI’ve been hash tagging Propertarianism in political posts that come up in my feed and selling it in the words of John Mark as parasite proof government. Is this a bad idea? lol “We need Parasite Proof Government #propertarianism” just like thatJan 10, 2019, 2:33 PMM.G. GreyheartI bet you’re becoming a hit with the MGTOWs.Jan 10, 2019, 2:46 PMNicholas CilantraM.G. Greyheart trolling as always. 🙄Jan 10, 2019, 3:05 PMNicholas CilantraAll right wing movements will continue to fail. Propertarianism explains why and counters our failures

    https://youtu.be/JQaaXbLi3uUJan 10, 2019, 3:09 PMRickyman Beistein*scanning for autism in supposed anon post to see if it was just Curt himself* Nope. Checks out.Jan 10, 2019, 3:10 PMMax CantuI want to see the replies lolJan 10, 2019, 3:15 PMChristopher HallPost the repliesJan 10, 2019, 3:23 PMCurt Doolittleonly one. usual libertarian stupidityJan 10, 2019, 3:31 PMSolomon VolodymyrRape is surely bad. Not even morally (no place here for morals, I know) but because it’s necessarily miscegenationJan 10, 2019, 3:32 PMDavid McCarthyMGTOW?Jan 10, 2019, 3:34 PMChristopher HallOh okJan 10, 2019, 3:36 PMLisa OuthwaitePerhaps if you were to offer up to the maiden targeted for a raping, a fully verifiable and well researched piece of testimony as to why it is a net gain for the commons that she be raped?Jan 10, 2019, 4:15 PMSolomon VolodymyrSpeaking as a moralfag, I fucking despise even the idea of rape. But there is no “propertarian” justification for it either.Jan 10, 2019, 4:29 PMLisa OuthwaiteSolomon Volodymyr You goddam moralfags make me sick. ;)Jan 10, 2019, 4:32 PMDoug RossRent seekers? Um wow that just vaulted you into the cool aid sectionJan 10, 2019, 6:23 PMEric GroseRape demoralizes the enemyJan 10, 2019, 7:07 PMMichael SheppardDavid McCarthy men go their own wayJan 10, 2019, 8:01 PMDavid McCarthyAh thanksJan 10, 2019, 10:23 PMNeggy Gen Vii Catholy fuck i gotta put aside time 2 actually research yur theoriesJan 11, 2019, 12:43 AMGlen DanielsI loathe people who cry “antisemitism” but your rant is half full of holes. Agree with some.

    Nathan Confas’ rebuttal to Kmac was somewhat compelling.

    Expulsions/forced conversions had several explanations, only a handful actually the fault of Jews. You already said you didnt care to research it (why bother, right?). Same point with usury. Requires context you’re more than happy not to provide.

    Putting the destruction created by Christ mythos and Islam at the feet of Judaism is a massive stretch since they evolved to counter and attack (most of) it. This should be obvious but you seem to merely “move the ball” to wherever a connection with Jews exists (ie. “Abrahamism”). Convenient.

    Other points are correct, especially “holocaustianity” being weaponized.

    Bottom line, you’re not coming across as objective on this and it’s 99% of what you talk about. And the dual citizenship post was an outright lie that diaspora have no control over.

    For what it’s worth, I agree with separation but solely based on their current neo-Marxism and political leanings. That whole realm is a legitimate reason to counter but the link to old world collective behavior hasn’t been made and seems non-existent.Jan 11, 2019, 2:14 AMBenjamin BakerDoug Ross (((rent seekers)))Jan 11, 2019, 5:59 AMDoug RossBenjamin Baker gotcha now makes more senseJan 11, 2019, 7:29 AMCurt DoolittleRead the three works I mentioned. Fatal Embrace, Solzhenitsyn, KMAC at the least. If you can counter those argumetns then you’ll have something to talk about.

    Nathan Confas’ argument was childish and I didn’t respond because KMAC’s made it unnecessary. However KMAC was more kind than I would have been.

    It’s not a stretch whatsoever. Read Catherine Nixey’s book.

    I am not ‘forgiving’ which is wat you mean by ‘objective’. I am a prosecutor and now that I have understaood their grammar and semantics I understand that the group evolutionary strategy of the three via-negativa peoples: gypsies, jews, and Muslims is identical but defended by three different excusesJan 11, 2019, 4:47 PMDave Walshcurt’s daughter is married to an Indian why would i follow someone who preaches revolution but cant even keep his house in order.Jan 12, 2019, 12:12 PMPat RyanYou may find this enjoyable.

    https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/148828096/?fbclid=IwAR2PfV99t8o_ljgeumhOVbBLti2C7IgZU4YUQOq46-p3p9J1uWAKUTlpKcY#148829107Jan 12, 2019, 2:07 PMHUMOR AND TRUTH FROM /POL. 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-10 13:12:00 UTC

  • “Logic and definitions are obviously tools of oppression invented by white heter

    —“Logic and definitions are obviously tools of oppression invented by white hetero normative cis males”—Greg Hamilton

    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-10 13:07:00 UTC

  • Questioning details from a position of ignorance means nothing. I can’t really a

    Questioning details from a position of ignorance means nothing. I can’t really answer non-arguments, or imagine your definitions, I can,as can all of us, only answer arguments with the definitions I use, as I define them, such that they are internally consistent with each other.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-10 00:38:52 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1083161215843614726

    Reply addressees: @DataDistribute @MusaVaino @BenBurgis

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1083158332372893697

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1083158332372893697

  • Yes, The Paradigm is Difficult.

    January 8th, 2019 12:34 PM [Y]es. I know the propertarian paradigm is difficult. Propertarianism = Natural Law = The completion of the scientific method = the reformation of the social sciences from pseudosciences to hard sciences = algorithmic, strictly constructed, common law of reciprocity, testimonial speech, and the warranty of due diligence of that speech = the means of constructing a scientific government = an explanation of the west’s success in the ancient and modern worlds, and the west’s survival from semitic, abrahamism. It used to be that the idea of science was as difficult as this idea of social science. Sorry. Paradigm shifts of this scale are just hard.

  • Yes, The Paradigm is Difficult.

    January 8th, 2019 12:34 PM [Y]es. I know the propertarian paradigm is difficult. Propertarianism = Natural Law = The completion of the scientific method = the reformation of the social sciences from pseudosciences to hard sciences = algorithmic, strictly constructed, common law of reciprocity, testimonial speech, and the warranty of due diligence of that speech = the means of constructing a scientific government = an explanation of the west’s success in the ancient and modern worlds, and the west’s survival from semitic, abrahamism. It used to be that the idea of science was as difficult as this idea of social science. Sorry. Paradigm shifts of this scale are just hard.

  • James, if this is a forum for discussion, then it’s a value. Which would require

    James, if this is a forum for discussion, then it’s a value. Which would require posting both sides of the debate. If this is a form for you to express your frustrations then it is no longer anything to do with theory policy and philosophy, but simply just emotional. Just create an “I hate trump” forum and put it there. But at present you’re not acting any differently from the alt-right-green-frog folks except your posting pseudo-rational propaganda instead of openly irrational green-frog cartoons.

    You have energy and a particular gift. And if you employ it honestly then you can make a contribution to the world.

    I’m honest about my work and my bias. (and yes, the fact that The Clinton Foundation defrauded me of $2M they said they would pay me for developing the greenhouse-gas measurement software, after we rescued their efforts in India at Microsoft’s request; and the fact that I have direct experience with these people – including Murdoch’s wife – might color my judgement a bit. These are ‘bad’ immoral, people for whom lying is simply a justifiable means of achieving their ends.)

    Anger destroys honesty. Half truths are lies. Half arguments are just half truths.

    Hence why I argue in the manner that I do: the only ‘good’ is exchange. The only ‘moral’ is non-imposition of costs.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-08 18:13:00 UTC

  • I know the paradigm is difficult. Propertarianism = Natural Law = The completion

    I know the paradigm is difficult.

    Propertarianism = Natural Law = The completion of the scientific method = the reformation of the social sciences from pseudosciences to hard sciences = algorithmic, strictly constructed, common law of reciprocity, testimonial speech, and the warranty of due diligence of that speech = the means of constructing a scientific government = an explanation of the west’s success in the ancient and modern worlds, and the west’s survival from semitic, abrahamism.

    It used to be that the idea of science was as difficult as this idea of social science.

    Sorry. Paradigm shifts of this scale are just hard.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-08 12:34:00 UTC

  • Something must be both false, and immoral. Christian mythology may be ‘true’ to

    Something must be both false, and immoral. Christian mythology may be ‘true’ to some portion of the faithful (at least ideally) but faith has no place in government, law, or war. However, there is nothing counter to the natural law in christian practice. So christianity passes the test of being not parasitic or counter to natural law. In fact, it is the OPTIMUM EXPRESSION of natural law.

    This NOT true of judaism and islam which are bothd estructive religions designed to destroy indo european aristocratic civilization.

    Moreover, while I see demand for a church at least in the protestant sense of participatory government of the commons, and while I consider myself a christian in the secular, and philosophical sense where christianity functions as a political religion, I also consider myself a heathen (pagan) and an advocate for ‘Natural Religion’ (Folk Religion of Nature, ancestors, family, and hearth) was well, and I consider myself an Aryan(or aristotelian) in the sense of the physical laws of nature, and the natural law of men.

    For these reasons my view of our future religion is along all THREE of these lines, incorporating the best aspects of all three traditions: heathen, aristotelian, and christian, and divesting those three systems of that which is false or harmful to our people.)

    I wrote the Oath of Transcendent man because I believe it is the optimum correspondence with the physical laws of the universe, and the natural laws of cooperation.

    Cheers

    https://propertarianism.com/the-oath-of-transcendent-man/

    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-07 16:22:00 UTC

  • The Oath of Transcendent Man

    A PAGAN(HEATHEN), A CHRISTIAN, AN ARYAN, A WARRIOR, A MAN TRANSCENDENT

    A religion of man, nature, and nature’s god need contain no lies, no false promises, no sophistry, nothing supernatural, and survives by the sheer ‘wonder’ of the universe that we are born to master, transform, and rule. [I] am a Heathen if 1) I accept the laws of nature as binding on all of existence; and 2) if I treat nature as sacred and to be contemplated, protected and improved; and 3) I treat the world as something to transform closer to an Eden in whatever ways I can before I die; and 4) if I deny the existence of a supreme being with dominion over the physical laws, and treat all gods, demigods, heroes, saints, figures of history, and ancestors as characters with whom I may speak to in private contemplation in the hope of gaining wisdom and synchronicity from having done so. And 5) if I participate with others of my society in repetition of oaths, repetition of myths, repetition of festivals, repetition of holidays, and the perpetuation of all of the above to my offspring. And 6) if I leave open that synchronicity appears to exist now and then, and that it may be possible that there is a scientific explanation for it, other than just humans subject to similar stimuli producing similar intuitions and therefore similar ends. As far as I know this is all that is required of me to be a Heathen. [I] am a Christian if I have adopted the teaching of christianity: 1) the eradication of hatred from the human heart. 2) the extension of kinship love to non-kin. 3) the demand for personal acts of charity and personal cost, 4) the extension of exhaustive forgiveness before punishment, enserfment, enslavement, death, or war. As far as I know, this is all that is required of me to be a Christian. [I] am an Aryan if 1) I proudly display my excellences so that others seek to achieve or exceed them; 2) I seek competition to constantly test and improve myself so I do not weaken; 3) I swear to speak no insult and demand it; 4) I speak the truth and demand it; 5) I take nothing not paid for and demand it; 6) I grant sovereignty to my kin and demand it; 7) I insure my people regardless of condition, and demand it; and in doing so leave nothing but voluntary markets of cooperation between sovereign men; and to discipline, enserf, enslave, ostracize or kill those who do otherwise; 8) to not show fear or cowardice, abandon my brothers, or retreat, and 9) to die a good death in the service of my kin, my clan, my tribe and my people. As far as I know, this is all that is required of me to be an Aryan. [I] am a Warrior in that 1) we will prepare for war so perfectly that none dare enter it against us. 2) Once we go to war, we do so with joy, with eagerness, and with passion, and without mercy, without constraint, and without remorse; And 3) before ending war, we shall defeat an enemy completely such that no other dares a condition of our enemy, and the memory of the slaughter lives a hundred generations. As far as I know, this is all that is required of me to be a Warrior. [A]s far as I know, if I succeed as a Heathen, as a Christian, as an Aryan, as a Warrior, then I have transcended the animal man, and earned my place among the saints, heroes, demigods, gods, in the memories, histories, and legends of man. And that is the objective of heroes, demigods, and gods. We leave the rest for ordinary men. And so I swear to my fathers and brothers, and to my mothers and sisters, and to all our people, back to the beginning, that I shall transcend myself and mankind, into the gods we seek, by demand for the virtues of excellence and beauty, heroism and duty, sovereignty and reciprocity, truth and promise, warranty and insurance, and judge and jury from all others; and I shall grant the same to any who consent; and shall protect the interest of those who came before us, those of us living, and those of us yet to come, by force of law, prosecution, restitution, punishment, or death of those who resist. Curt Doolittle The Cult of Sovereignty The Philosophy of Aristocracy The Natural Law of Reciprocity The Propertarian Institute, Kiev, Ukraine