Curt Doolittle

Theme: Truth

  • GOLD. ABSOLUTE GOLD. —“We are the most trusting individually which probably me

    GOLD. ABSOLUTE GOLD.

    —“We are the most trusting individually which probably means we need to be the most ruthless collectively.”—‎Bryan Nova Brey‎

    😉

    Rules to Live By.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-01 13:56:00 UTC

  • “The cost of high trust must be matched by a higher cost of violating it.”—Ste

    —“The cost of high trust must be matched by a higher cost of violating it.”—Steve Pender

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-01 13:54:00 UTC

  • GENERATIONS AND THE ERAS OF FRAUD E-Prime = Testimony of My Knowledge (Science=T

    GENERATIONS AND THE ERAS OF FRAUD

    E-Prime = Testimony of My Knowledge (Science=Testimony)

    Medieval Thought = Supernatural knowledge

    Greco/Roman Thought = Supernormal Knowledge

    Germanic Languages = Testimonial (descriptive).

    (Germanic=Scandinavian, Germanic, Celtic, Italic)

    (Italic(present) = Romance (latin) languages.)

    Aristotle RESTORED naturalist thought.

    Bacon et all RESTORED naturalist thought.

    The Operationalists RESTORED naturalist thought.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-01 09:56:00 UTC

  • “One Law to Rule Them All One Law to Bind Them One Law to Conquer Them All And i

    “One Law to Rule Them All
    One Law to Bind Them
    One Law to Conquer Them All
    And in the Truth Bind Them….”

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-01 02:56:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1091168310048239616

  • Bill Joslin IMO korzybski devised a way to enact an essentially relativistic and

    Bill Joslin

    IMO korzybski devised a way to enact an essentially relativistic and nihilists position.

    The brilliance of this tool, again IMO , was grounding e-prime into a standard criteria i.e. operationalism. By doing so it closes the door to the relativistic, nihilistic uses.

    Further to that, e-prime strongly couples our speech and thought to the operational criteria. But if left at this alone, I think it would suffer the same flaws as logical positivism…

    By expanding the criteria into multiple dimensions, we don’t reduce our warrant (speech and thought) to overly restrictive limitations (i.e. cherry picking, erroneous or undue dismissiveness.)

    The last component , acknowledging truth as an approximation (as per Curt’s view) prevents us from undue certainty and dogmatically held assertions of “truth”.

    So

    – E-prime eliminates unfounded assertions

    – Operationalism eliminates relativistic nihilistic application

    – Expanded operationalism (testimonial criteria) eliminates myopic limitations (undue dismissiveness)

    – And provisional truth theories eliminate dogmatic assertions of certainty.

    – The first contributor did the light lifting – nothing really

    – The second (Bridgeman) cross the major threshold

    – Curt and his community (assuming other contributed – Curzon etc) the the heavy lifting

    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-31 22:19:00 UTC

  • “One Law to Rule Them All One Law to Bind Them One Law to Conquer Them All And i

    “One Law to Rule Them All

    One Law to Bind Them

    One Law to Conquer Them All

    And in the Truth Bind Them….”

    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-31 21:55:00 UTC

  • “WHY CAN’T YOU SAY PROPERTARIANISM SIMPLY”– Right, so, I can…. Propertarianis

    —“WHY CAN’T YOU SAY PROPERTARIANISM SIMPLY”–

    Right, so, I can….

    Propertarianism consists of a collection of ideas, the most fundamental of which is the completion of the scientific method and its application to all fields, resulting in a universally commensurable, universally explicable, language of ethics, law, politics, economics, and group evolutionary (survival) strategies.

    Because of the combination of language and means of testing that language, we can produce a formal law that allows us to complete the jeffersonian project (constitutionalism), restore libel and slander, and extend the prosecution of fraud from commerce to financial, economic, legal, and political speech.

    With this extremely *intolerant* law we can restore our civilization to its historic group strategy of high trust and high velocity and high relative prosperity with rule of law under sovereignty, reciprocity, truth, duty, the natural law, and markets in all aspects of life – and purge marxists, postmodernists, feminists from all walks of life as well as depoliticize, definancialize, decentralize, our commons, and restore the civil society.

    This will, implemented as formal logic of law, within a formal constitution written in that law, use the market incentive to prosecute these information-criminals and rapidly restore our way of life, including the restoration of the laboring, working, and middle classes.

    If you want me to teach you the technique of how to produce that law as ‘algorithmic law’ then you’re gonna need a class to do it.

    That’s because you cannot imagine the depth of the rabbit hole that this method results in, and how many ideas roll out of it, or how much you will change by undrestanding it.

    Otherwise that’s it.

    ;)

    Now, what you said about darwin was that organisms survived by adapting to local circumstances. What you didn’t say about Darwin is that (a) it’s undirected (b) it’s reproduction not survival, (c) local adaptation often leads to dead ends. (d) the only direction is increasing complexity. … and a hundred other meaningful things that stop people from misinterpreting it.

    So that’s the issue. I said above what I said, but god knows what kinda idiocy people will come up with when they read it.

    Hence “it’s complicated”. lol

    Cheers and thanks for being ‘demanding’ but intellectually honest.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-31 21:04:00 UTC

  • IF YOU PRACTICE EPRIME ALONE YOU WILL NOT BELIEVE WHAT IT WILL DO FOR YOUR REASO

    IF YOU PRACTICE EPRIME ALONE YOU WILL NOT BELIEVE WHAT IT WILL DO FOR YOUR REASONING OVER TIME.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-31 16:03:00 UTC

  • Mindfulness can be provided truthfully or untruthfully. Mindfulness is extremely

    Mindfulness can be provided truthfully or untruthfully. Mindfulness is extremely rewarding. So rewarding that we defend it. Religion provides an addiction response, and the natural response of addicts to defend the source of their addiction.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-30 14:15:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1090614426259079168

  • “I learned years ago to think in terms of what would be beneficial rather that w

    —“I learned years ago to think in terms of what would be beneficial rather that whats good or bad. Good and bad can be argued all day long but determining what is beneficial is quite simple and difficult to argue against.

    I believe that change in paradigm is aligned perfectly with reciprocity, as reciprocity(according to my understanding) is finding the most beneficial compromise between two or more parties.

    What people consider to be “moral” is subjective as it varies from culture to culture and has changed throughout time. I haven’t seen evidence to support the idea that there is such a thing as objective or absolute morality since it is subject to change.

    Perhaps the notion of defining morality or determining what is moral and amoral is a thing of the past and should be updated to include the most beneficial practices for all parties involved.

    One sided thinking in the extreme has led to most if not all the social issues that plague humanity, in my opinion of course – I’m sure there are plenty who would disagree(in their state of one sided thinking ;p)”—David McCarthy

    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-30 14:14:00 UTC