Curt Doolittle

Theme: Truth

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1551463260 Timestamp) The truth is always anti-something or other. Otherwise we wouldn’t need it.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1551451889 Timestamp) TEST OF ABRAHAMIC RELIGION What are priests selling in exchange for income and status? Is christianity history or mythology, true or poetic? Is there life after death or not? Is it truly wisdom or is it a means of self deception? If you learned stoicism instead of christianity, and if you learned history and science instead of mythology and supernaturalism would you and your people live a better life? Why did we rise out of superstition ignorance and poverty once we restored aristotelian thought, and literacy rather than semitic thought and illiteracy? Why did we have such a drastic increase in quality of life after the church was no longer able to prey upon the people through rents and tithes? Why are we vulnerable to marxism, postmodernism, and feminism if it is not for christianity? Why is christianity taught and argued using the same techniques as marxism, postmodernism, and feminism? Why do christians let our people be conquered rather than fight like the pagans do? Why are pagans and atheists so desirous of conflict and the christians cowardice? TEST OF RECIPROCITY Productive (fail) it’s parasitic. Fully informed (fail) it’s totally false. Warrantied (fail) they can’t warranty supernatural. Voluntary (fail) threat if you don’t comply Free of Externality: the externalities are suicidal.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1551463260 Timestamp) The truth is always anti-something or other. Otherwise we wouldn’t need it.

  • (FB 1551555771 Timestamp) Attacking my intolerance as arrogance only serves to d

    (FB 1551555771 Timestamp) Attacking my intolerance as arrogance only serves to demonstrate my arguments.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1551633978 Timestamp) STOICISM, PROPERTARIANISM, ECONOMICS, HISTORY ARE THE BEST WE CAN DO. There will always be hyper conservatives, sophists, pseudoscientists, supernaturalists on the right. There will always be hedonists (hyper consumption), sophists, pseudoscientist and occultists on the left. The best we can do is provide education in mindfulness, propertarianism, history to reduce their numbers Stoicism => Self Propertarianism => Others Economics => Polities History => Mankind. #post

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1551572497 Timestamp) NO MORE LIES —“@Curt Doolittle If I have an idea, a theory, yet don’t have the evidence yet–it still might be true. The Higgs Boson comes to mind. It was an idea, a theory, there were no facts yet to prove it, it fit in with the standard model, itself a theory, and solved some problems in quantum mechanics, but it wasn’t until the particle was actually discovered by the LHC that we could call it true. So was it a lie before then? You can’t always exactly know what’s true. Some questions are unsettled. So we make assumptions to try things out. It’s not exactly faith but it’s like it. It requires that we temporarily believe in it to test it, to question it, to try and figure it out. All part of reasoning. Maybe you didn’t mean what you said to this depth, what you wrote seems to make perfect sense on the surface, but through a little questioning, seeking to drill down, to get to the essence and the fundamentals of things, it seemed to me to be a little imprecise. This is not to simply be disputatious, to be contrary, not to be mean or anything, your statement was a fine, stimulating, sentiment, but to honestly question.​”— Mark Wright We do not have faith or temporarily believe in anything. We seek only to discover by testing that which is testable. And we limit ourselves to that limit. 1) such things are testable and falsifiable. 2) such things preserve the parsimony of naturalism, 3) such things are not counter to all of historical evidence, nor commensurate with the long history of ignorance error, fraud, and deceit
    4) such things serve as no premise for consequent inference likewise for fraud and deceit, 5) such things are not dependent on verbal pretense or sophism, 6) such things are not claimed true only speculative,
    7) such things have no malincentive to lie, or preserve a lie.
    8) Conversely what i argued against was the opposite of all those tests. It is not arrogance but intolerance for the continued use of lies against my people by those in conscious or unconscious league with the ancient enemy of not only my people but all of mankind. No more lies. #post

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1551633978 Timestamp) STOICISM, PROPERTARIANISM, ECONOMICS, HISTORY ARE THE BEST WE CAN DO. There will always be hyper conservatives, sophists, pseudoscientists, supernaturalists on the right. There will always be hedonists (hyper consumption), sophists, pseudoscientist and occultists on the left. The best we can do is provide education in mindfulness, propertarianism, history to reduce their numbers Stoicism => Self Propertarianism => Others Economics => Polities History => Mankind. #post

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1551572497 Timestamp) NO MORE LIES —“@Curt Doolittle If I have an idea, a theory, yet don’t have the evidence yet–it still might be true. The Higgs Boson comes to mind. It was an idea, a theory, there were no facts yet to prove it, it fit in with the standard model, itself a theory, and solved some problems in quantum mechanics, but it wasn’t until the particle was actually discovered by the LHC that we could call it true. So was it a lie before then? You can’t always exactly know what’s true. Some questions are unsettled. So we make assumptions to try things out. It’s not exactly faith but it’s like it. It requires that we temporarily believe in it to test it, to question it, to try and figure it out. All part of reasoning. Maybe you didn’t mean what you said to this depth, what you wrote seems to make perfect sense on the surface, but through a little questioning, seeking to drill down, to get to the essence and the fundamentals of things, it seemed to me to be a little imprecise. This is not to simply be disputatious, to be contrary, not to be mean or anything, your statement was a fine, stimulating, sentiment, but to honestly question.​”— Mark Wright We do not have faith or temporarily believe in anything. We seek only to discover by testing that which is testable. And we limit ourselves to that limit. 1) such things are testable and falsifiable. 2) such things preserve the parsimony of naturalism, 3) such things are not counter to all of historical evidence, nor commensurate with the long history of ignorance error, fraud, and deceit
    4) such things serve as no premise for consequent inference likewise for fraud and deceit, 5) such things are not dependent on verbal pretense or sophism, 6) such things are not claimed true only speculative,
    7) such things have no malincentive to lie, or preserve a lie.
    8) Conversely what i argued against was the opposite of all those tests. It is not arrogance but intolerance for the continued use of lies against my people by those in conscious or unconscious league with the ancient enemy of not only my people but all of mankind. No more lies. #post

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1551566518 Timestamp) PROP THOUGHT PROVIDES STOIC REWARDS (author gave me permission to share) (this is not an uncommon observation) —“Hi Curt Can I share something with you..? I’m trying to formulate some thinking around the implications of P … particularly in how Operationalism etc may relate to “individual well being”. Background: I’m going through a difficult situation with child custody right now… A lot high stress exchanges, bad feelings, shaming, baiting by from ex wife, gossip in local community. (rrgsm) However, I’m also getting a great deal satisfaction learning to incorporate testimonials into daily life. And it’s helping these immediate circumstances. Seriously: Tell people to focus on ONE particular video “Propertarianism – Testimonialism: Epistemology” Now, just thinking through some observations: As I shift my thinking towards P’s Operationalism and Testimonial epistemology…I’m finding a correlative shift of experience in my emotional states. Quite strikingly so. And I’m now wondering if there must be some direct causality between adopting the conceptual frameworks of P and subsequent real time changes in neurochemical/cortical function. e.g. that using P in an daily capacity instantiates higher cortical activity and accelerates and reinforces optimum levels of cognitive performance. And I think it’s because modes of thinking with P causes adrenal “fight-flight” activity (and clouded judgement) to subside. Somehow the INTERNAL COHERENCY of P seems to be a significant factor. So, does the multi-dimensional coherency of the conceptual approach (P) have some direct resonant relationship towards cortical functioning? Has this angle been discussed anywhere? Do you think it is possible to describe the emergent neurochemical basis (that allows for clear thinking) but as a ramification for having adopted P (Operationalism and Testimonialism) in particular? Cheers!”— (Bill Joslin Explains) Endocrine stress: P derived conclusions allow the hypothalamus to calm after acquisition (no more effort to needed to support or uphold the conclusion) – a high stressed CORT driven endocrine aligns with floating conclusions which require constant effort to maintain. The RESULT being a stoic calm opposed to a stoic calm being the practice to achieve calmness: “Odin grants a hard heart” FWIW: King of the hill learning might actually be a biological imperative for learning P as it’s an Adrenal (i.e. not CORT) driven process. –Bill Joslin

    ( Curt: P => Stoicism. )

  • Curt Doolittle shared a link.

    (FB 1551794373 Timestamp) TRUE NAMES FOR SCHOOLS OF ECONOMICS https://propertarianinstitute.com/2016/09/15/how-about-operational-true-names-for-schools-of-economics/