Theme: Truth

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1543527253 Timestamp) SORRY, NO ONE WILL EVER “DESTROY” ME IN HONEST ARGUMENT. WON’T HAPPEN. —“E Michael Jones [would destroy] Curt’s sandcastle he spent all day building”— Dream on buddy. 😉 Never, ever, happen. Why? Which was the greater influence on the uniqueness of, and success of, the west? The Military, The Engineers and Metalsmiths, the Entrepreneurs(risk takers), The Law, The Philosophers, or the Church? We SURVIVED Christianity. We were not made by it. You see, choosing one grammar (model) allows cherry picking and justification. But choosing ALL models doesn’t. Victor Davis Hanson is right. “The Other Greeks”. The only criticism is, that evidence shows, the greek aristocracy were western Aryans practicing ancient aryan sovereignty, reciprocity, truth, duty, contractualism, and law. It all begins with the militia. And the militia begins with the Yamna and Cattle Raiding. Our militia order survived christianity. The farther north the more it survived. The farther south the more it was defeated by the church’s corruption. That which one perceives as good (survivor bias) may not in fact be good. I this case, while religions (myths, feasts, festivals) are in general a good thing. Abrahamic religions bring forth dark ages, ignorance, death, and decline. No matter how many men in those times try to desperately preserve our ancestral knowledge. No matter how many needles you find in christian, jewish, and muslim haystacks, they will never ever reach anything close to the achievements of western man in the ancient and modern worlds. EVER. The Christians were destroyers – we just managed to conquer the Church when it’s corruption was not longer tolerable. The Jews were destroyers and still are – by undermining every (109) host country they have been evicted from. The muslims were and are destroyers and still are – by raiding, invasion, and population replacement. Abrahamic religions are the greatest evil ever to befall mankind other than the great plagues and natural disasters. Not even the mongols come close – because they were only greedy – not hateful. Truth is enough. The Law is enough. Imposition of the Law by organized violence is enough. The organized violence of the militia of men who would be sovereign is enough. That is the lesson of history.

    See The Following Walk Through History:

    David Reich’s “Who We Are and How We Got Here: Ancient DNA and the New Science of the Human Past” JP Mallory’s “In Search of the Indo-Europeans” David Anthony’s “The Horse, the Wheel, and Language: How Bronze-Age Riders from the Eurasian Steppes Shaped the Modern World” Eric Cline’s “1177 B.C.: The Year Civilization Collapsed” Karen Armstrong’s “The Great Transformation: The Beginning of Our Religious Traditions”, “Fields of Blood: Religion and the History of Violence” Victor Davis Hanson’s “The Other Greeks”, “The Western Way of War”, “The Soul of Battle”, “Carnage and Culture”, “The Father of Us All”, John Keegan’s “The History of Warfare”, Martin Van Crevld’s “The Culture of War” William Lind’s “4th Generation Warfare Handbook” -Cheers

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1543515426 Timestamp) —“We are men, we do not live in the world of lies.”— Anonymous SAS Officer Conversely, those who live in a world of lies, are not men.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1543512265 Timestamp) —If you want to know why people from other countries follow me, that’s the reason: Truth is dependent only upon will, not upon geography, culture, or genes.—CD

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1543527253 Timestamp) SORRY, NO ONE WILL EVER “DESTROY” ME IN HONEST ARGUMENT. WON’T HAPPEN. —“E Michael Jones [would destroy] Curt’s sandcastle he spent all day building”— Dream on buddy. 😉 Never, ever, happen. Why? Which was the greater influence on the uniqueness of, and success of, the west? The Military, The Engineers and Metalsmiths, the Entrepreneurs(risk takers), The Law, The Philosophers, or the Church? We SURVIVED Christianity. We were not made by it. You see, choosing one grammar (model) allows cherry picking and justification. But choosing ALL models doesn’t. Victor Davis Hanson is right. “The Other Greeks”. The only criticism is, that evidence shows, the greek aristocracy were western Aryans practicing ancient aryan sovereignty, reciprocity, truth, duty, contractualism, and law. It all begins with the militia. And the militia begins with the Yamna and Cattle Raiding. Our militia order survived christianity. The farther north the more it survived. The farther south the more it was defeated by the church’s corruption. That which one perceives as good (survivor bias) may not in fact be good. I this case, while religions (myths, feasts, festivals) are in general a good thing. Abrahamic religions bring forth dark ages, ignorance, death, and decline. No matter how many men in those times try to desperately preserve our ancestral knowledge. No matter how many needles you find in christian, jewish, and muslim haystacks, they will never ever reach anything close to the achievements of western man in the ancient and modern worlds. EVER. The Christians were destroyers – we just managed to conquer the Church when it’s corruption was not longer tolerable. The Jews were destroyers and still are – by undermining every (109) host country they have been evicted from. The muslims were and are destroyers and still are – by raiding, invasion, and population replacement. Abrahamic religions are the greatest evil ever to befall mankind other than the great plagues and natural disasters. Not even the mongols come close – because they were only greedy – not hateful. Truth is enough. The Law is enough. Imposition of the Law by organized violence is enough. The organized violence of the militia of men who would be sovereign is enough. That is the lesson of history.

    See The Following Walk Through History:

    David Reich’s “Who We Are and How We Got Here: Ancient DNA and the New Science of the Human Past” JP Mallory’s “In Search of the Indo-Europeans” David Anthony’s “The Horse, the Wheel, and Language: How Bronze-Age Riders from the Eurasian Steppes Shaped the Modern World” Eric Cline’s “1177 B.C.: The Year Civilization Collapsed” Karen Armstrong’s “The Great Transformation: The Beginning of Our Religious Traditions”, “Fields of Blood: Religion and the History of Violence” Victor Davis Hanson’s “The Other Greeks”, “The Western Way of War”, “The Soul of Battle”, “Carnage and Culture”, “The Father of Us All”, John Keegan’s “The History of Warfare”, Martin Van Crevld’s “The Culture of War” William Lind’s “4th Generation Warfare Handbook” -Cheers

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1543515426 Timestamp) —“We are men, we do not live in the world of lies.”— Anonymous SAS Officer Conversely, those who live in a world of lies, are not men.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1543512265 Timestamp) —If you want to know why people from other countries follow me, that’s the reason: Truth is dependent only upon will, not upon geography, culture, or genes.—CD

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1543600820 Timestamp) “LYING” IN THE WHITE LAW (PROPERTARIANISM) by Daniel Roland Anderson —“I (we) require you to perform due diligence before making a truth claim. In other words, we have a higher standard of not lying. This prevents people (as we do in law) from claiming ignorance.”—Curt Doolittle This is the first time I’ve seen you explain why you use the term “lie” the way you do. I’m glad I randomly scroll through comment sections like this looking for gold. I’m thinking another couple paragraphs, and this is a post that resolves some angst with IQs all the way down to 95. The rest of this discussion on the relationship between truth, meaning, and lying is more important for a lot of us though because it seems to cause a lot of confusion—more so the truth and meaning thing. INCREASE IN THE SCOPE OF LYING RESULTS FROM AN INCREASE IN THE SCOPE OF WARRANTY, DUE TO AN INCREASE IN THE SCOPE OF DUE DILIGENCE

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1543588907 Timestamp) —“If your speech does not satisfy the categories necessary to demonstrate due diligence or establish warrantee against fraud, bias, or error, why on earth would I take you seriously?”—Micah Pezdirtz

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1543586504 Timestamp) —“One of my philosophy professors said, it’s not that you can’t use analogy and metaphor to express some difficult ideas, but eventually you have to actually tell us what you MEAN. We will insist on that point.”—Daniel Roland Anderson

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1543600820 Timestamp) “LYING” IN THE WHITE LAW (PROPERTARIANISM) by Daniel Roland Anderson —“I (we) require you to perform due diligence before making a truth claim. In other words, we have a higher standard of not lying. This prevents people (as we do in law) from claiming ignorance.”—Curt Doolittle This is the first time I’ve seen you explain why you use the term “lie” the way you do. I’m glad I randomly scroll through comment sections like this looking for gold. I’m thinking another couple paragraphs, and this is a post that resolves some angst with IQs all the way down to 95. The rest of this discussion on the relationship between truth, meaning, and lying is more important for a lot of us though because it seems to cause a lot of confusion—more so the truth and meaning thing. INCREASE IN THE SCOPE OF LYING RESULTS FROM AN INCREASE IN THE SCOPE OF WARRANTY, DUE TO AN INCREASE IN THE SCOPE OF DUE DILIGENCE