@BIGSCHMOOL Good. STOP YOUR LYING. I have succeeded in stopping you from lying to me. There are many more we must stop you from lying to.
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-14 19:03:06 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102441352303011531
Theme: Truth
-
Boost of @Truthist7346 @BIGSCHMOOL @curtd It’s all in your grammar. He’s made a
Boost of @Truthist7346@BIGSCHMOOL@curtd It’s all in your grammar. He’s made a science out of how to tell when someone isn’t telling the truth (notice that’s different than a science to tell if someone IS telling the truth). So far, the results have supported the theory. Do you have an argument? Then put it forth. Otherwise, you’re a waste of time.
“The only truths we know for certain are falsehoods. Everything that is not false is a truth candidate. This is the inverse of the fallacy of justificationism and the central insight of the sciences: the means by which we invent or grasp an idea contribute nothing to whether or not it is true or false.”
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-14 15:24:46 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102440588937486090
-
@BIGSCHMOOL @Nationalist7346 Willing to teach the able. Questions, Arguments, an
@BIGSCHMOOL @Nationalist7346 Willing to teach the able. Questions, Arguments, and intellectual honesty are worth my time. GSRRM to obscure their absence is not. Dont waste my time.
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-14 14:58:41 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102440391201718893
-
@BIGSCHMOOL @Nationalist7346 So.. yes “I live in” the dichotomy between truthful
@BIGSCHMOOL @Nationalist7346 So.. yes “I live in” the dichotomy between truthful speech and every other kind of speech. 😉 Because that’s my job. … To compensate for the rest of you.
It’d be nice if y’all didn’t make so much work for me. lol
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-14 00:04:10 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102436873827500456
Replying to: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102436847431016069
IN REPLY TO:
@curtd
@BIGSCHMOOL @Nationalist7346 What I find most amusing is the same crowd that says my work is too complicated for normal people to understand, complains just as loudly when I simplify it so that normal people can understand….. Depriving the enemy of its host of forms of parasitism, fraud, and deceit means we also deprive ourselves of illusions of agency, knowledge, and understanding. … we can only improve by doing so. They can only fail by doing so.
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102436847431016069
-
@BIGSCHMOOL @Nationalist7346 I work in testimony(truth) and reciprocity (law) or
@BIGSCHMOOL @Nationalist7346 I work in testimony(truth) and reciprocity (law) or what lesser men use unaccountable language to cal epistemology and ethics. I just demarcate between lying by pretense of knowledge and demonstration of knowledge in due diligence under testimony. My job is to end lying in public (political) discourse. Even comforting lies.
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-13 23:41:02 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102436782920496396
-
Boost of @Truthist7346 @BIGSCHMOOL @curtd Key difference here…”That said, we a
Boost of @Truthist7346@BIGSCHMOOL@curtd
Key difference here…”That said, we are not talking about science here.”
Curt and propertarians are always discussing things on a scientific basis, not sophisms. Anyone that goes on babbling about Logos, in my experience, is often a petersonite or a continental. And petersonites and the continentals, like Peterson are often sophists. Even though, they’re on the “same team” as us, they’ll often counter signal accurate attacks on Christianity itself. So, this needs correction.
“Aristotle applied the term (logos) to refer to “reasoned discourse” or “the argument” in the field of rhetoric, and considered it one of the three modes of persuasion alongside ethos and pathos.”
Logos’s semantic use in purely relational (N-dimensions) speech can mean many things to many people (why sophists love it), but it’s deflation just simply means logic, which provides internal consistency to testimony. There are many different dimensions we can test a persons testimony for consistency in.
The total number of these dimensions have been worked out by Curt already in the epistemology of propertarianism called testimonialim. See in image. Failing any one of these tests demonstrates speech as false (incomplete and untrue).
Conflating Christ’s teachings with straight logic is laughable. Even more so, is the claim that it’s (logos) evolution came from Christ or that Christ’s teachings were derived from logos and then he improved upon the ideas of logos.
That’s justificationism for your faith and a lie. No more lies. Yes, billions of people can believe in lies. The only reason Christianity became great was because the scientific extracted truths from it were compatible with natural law and there was nothing in Christianity that wasn’t already present in our civilizations prior to it besides maybe greater degrees of our expressed mercy which isn’t necessarily a good thing.
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-13 20:33:47 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102437162309545456
-
@gaidhealtachd I did. The question is whether you understood or not and as such
@gaidhealtachd I did. The question is whether you understood or not and as such whether you honestly or dishonestly denied it.
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-12 22:11:24 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102430768107547873
-
@BIGSCHMOOL Abandon your Abrahamic (Jewish) war against western civilization, an
@BIGSCHMOOL Abandon your Abrahamic (Jewish) war against western civilization, and return to our people with Truth and Testimony not lies and hearsay. Its all lies. It was a cancer given to our people. On purpose, by the east, to conquer the west, the way they had conquered their own women, slaves and peasants.
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-12 18:34:59 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102429917173955718
Replying to: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102429905737879126
IN REPLY TO:
@curtd
@BIGSCHMOOL That’s empirically false right? I mean, Math, Science, Operational language, Engineering, Demonstrated Preference, Reciprocity, and Legal Testimony are antidotes for lies. Idealism, Analogy, and Supernaturalism are just a comforting means of obscuring and justifying lying with artful sophism (abrahamic lying). If you can’t say it in the grammar and vocabulary of testimony (science) they you either don’t know what you’re talking about, are a purveyor of lies, or a maker of lies. But it’s just LYING. Its all just lies.
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102429905737879126
-
@BIGSCHMOOL That’s empirically false right? I mean, Math, Science, Operational l
@BIGSCHMOOL That’s empirically false right? I mean, Math, Science, Operational language, Engineering, Demonstrated Preference, Reciprocity, and Legal Testimony are antidotes for lies.
Idealism, Analogy, and Supernaturalism are just a comforting means of obscuring and justifying lying with artful sophism (abrahamic lying).
If you can’t say it in the grammar and vocabulary of testimony (science) they you either don’t know what you’re talking about, are a purveyor of lies, or a maker of lies.
But it’s just LYING.
Its all just lies.
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-12 18:32:05 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102429905737879126
-
@BIGSCHMOOL I don’ t make errors. My job is to correct every one of the semitic
@BIGSCHMOOL I don’ t make errors. My job is to correct every one of the semitic and platonic lies possible. No more cowardice, no more lies.
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-12 18:26:19 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102429883048307726