Theme: Truth

  • The question is, whether or not that claim is true. And instead, if a matter of

    The question is, whether or not that claim is true. And instead, if a matter of degrees and sufficiency. ;). I am certain the latter. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2024-03-12 23:52:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1767700334489616524

    Reply addressees: @AcragasOf

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1767696349787525321

  • Nothing here is anything but obvious. That you approach the subject from alterna

    Nothing here is anything but obvious. That you approach the subject from alternative positions does not mean you contribute novelty to the underlying understanding – which is simple.
    Female behavior can be reduced to about five first principles, and all demonstrated behavior constructed from it. (Sex differences as well)
    Unfortunately, quite by accident, I developed a specialization in female means of lying, and as a consequence cognition.
    Which itself is a fascinating field.
    Men and women are not complicated.
    It’s the erroneous premises we start with that cloud the issues with permutations of nonsense.

    Reply addressees: @SexyIsntSexist


    Source date (UTC): 2024-03-11 17:21:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1767239489171120128

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1767134060294594784

  • I am correct. Sorry. You are a typical fundamentalist as well as ideologist. And

    I am correct. Sorry. You are a typical fundamentalist as well as ideologist. And your life is absent demonstration of competency. As such by the evidence you are the product of vulnerability to indoctrination into social constructions, each of which seeks social proof to evade…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-03-10 23:44:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1766973378164887556

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1766967762423861463

  • I’m probably one of the better logicians living and working today. Sophistry is

    I’m probably one of the better logicians living and working today. Sophistry is not the same as logic any more than fiction is the same as testimony. Michael Huemer is stating what the argument consists of, not that it’s correct. In other words he’s demonstrating what’s wrong…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-03-10 22:45:03 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1766958476276678865

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1766953044967670173

  • RT @curtdoolittle: @GlitchAmer85803 @Y_Contributor @RebuildingtheA2 Those who de

    RT @curtdoolittle: @GlitchAmer85803 @Y_Contributor @RebuildingtheA2 Those who deny suppress and obscure the truth are simply liars. And the…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-03-10 22:07:07 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1766948927847211307

  • Those who deny suppress and obscure the truth are simply liars. And the success

    Those who deny suppress and obscure the truth are simply liars. And the success of the west depends upon one of its uniqueness: “truth before face regardless of cost”. It is this origin of western success that the feminine seditious dysgenic left seeks to undermine by promoting…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-03-10 22:07:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1766948914190528740

    Reply addressees: @GlitchAmer85803 @Y_Contributor @RebuildingtheA2

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1766941734511190247

  • THE IMPORTANCE OF P-LAW UNAMBIGUITY The set of criteria for testifiable prose is

    THE IMPORTANCE OF P-LAW UNAMBIGUITY
    The set of criteria for testifiable prose is designed to create a form of communication that is, above all, unambiguous. By requiring complete sentences in promissory and testimonial form, using operational vocabulary, avoiding the verb “to be,” and including all relevant changes in state and their consequences, testifiable prose eliminates the potential for multiple interpretations or misunderstandings.

    This unambiguity is crucial for converting ordinary language, which is often riddled with vagueness and ambiguity, into precise systems of measurement. By ensuring that each statement or claim is clear, specific, and unambiguous, testifiable prose allows for the creation of a common language that can be used to accurately describe, analyze, and compare various phenomena or ideas.

    Moreover, the unambiguity of testifiable prose plays a vital role in suppressing errors and deceits that can arise from deduction, inference, abduction, and analogy. When language is ambiguous or open to multiple interpretations, it becomes easier for fallacious arguments or misleading conclusions to take hold. By contrast, the strict criteria of testifiable prose make it much more difficult for such errors and deceits to go unnoticed or unchallenged.

    In addition to promoting clarity, objectivity, actionable content, comprehensiveness, testability, logical consistency, accessibility, reproducibility, and providing a foundation for further analysis, the unambiguity achieved through testifiable prose is perhaps its most significant benefit. It enables more precise communication, reduces the potential for misunderstandings or misinterpretations, and helps to create a shared understanding of the subject matter at hand.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-03-08 00:42:52 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1765900960574943232

  • CLAUDE-OPUS 3 VS GPT4+ (BOTH PAID) Claude is MUCH smarter at present. Note that

    CLAUDE-OPUS 3 VS GPT4+ (BOTH PAID)
    Claude is MUCH smarter at present.
    Note that Claude3 correctly identified “Unambiguity” while GPT4 correctly identified “Empirical Rigor” but neither identified both.

    PROMPT FOR BOTH AIs
    “I use the term “testifiable prose” to refer to the set of criteria requiring:
    1. Complete Sentences
    2. In promissory form
    3. In testimonial form
    4. In operational vocabulary (as actions)
    5. From an observer’s point of view
    6. Absent the verb to-be (is, are, was, were…)
    7. Including all changes in state
    8. Including all consequences of change in state
    9. Producing a series of testable transactions.

    What can you derive from that set of requirements?”

    1) CLAUDE 3 RESPONSE
    Based on the set of criteria you provided for “testifiable prose,” I can derive several key implications and benefits:

    Clarity and specificity (Unambiguous): By requiring complete sentences in promissory and testimonial form, using operational vocabulary, and avoiding the verb “to be,” the prose becomes more precise and unambiguous. This helps to minimize misinterpretation and ensures that the ideas being conveyed are clear and specific.
    Objectivity (Observable, Empirical): By writing from an observer’s point of view, the prose maintains a sense of objectivity. This perspective helps to reduce bias and subjective interpretations, making the information more reliable and trustworthy.
    Actionable content: (Existentially Possible) The use of operational vocabulary (as actions) means that the prose focuses on concrete, observable behaviors or processes. This emphasis on actionable content makes the information more practical and applicable in real-world situations.
    Comprehensive account: (full accounting) By including all changes in state and their consequences, the prose provides a complete and comprehensive account of the subject matter. This thorough approach ensures that no important details are omitted, and readers have a full understanding of the situation or process being described.
    Testability and verification: (Testable) The requirement to produce a series of testable transactions means that the claims or statements made in the prose can be empirically validated. This testability is crucial for establishing the credibility and reliability of the information being presented.
    Logical consistency: (Consistent) The structured nature of the prose, with its focus on complete sentences, clear cause-and-effect relationships, and the inclusion of all relevant changes in state, promotes logical consistency. This consistency helps to ensure that the arguments or ideas presented are coherent and well-supported.
    Accessibility and engagement: (Comprehensible) While the prose may be more structured and formal than everyday language, the emphasis on clarity, specificity, and actionable content can make it more accessible and engaging for readers. By providing a clear and comprehensive account of the subject matter, the prose can effectively communicate complex ideas to a wide audience.
    Reproducibility: (Repeatable) The testability and comprehensive nature of the prose make it possible for others to reproduce the described processes or verify the claims made. This reproducibility is essential for building trust and credibility, as it allows for independent confirmation of the information presented.
    Foundational for further analysis: (Sound) The structured and comprehensive nature of testifiable prose provides a solid foundation for further analysis, discussion, and decision-making. By establishing a clear and reliable account of the subject matter, the prose enables more productive and informed conversations and actions.

    In summary, the set of criteria for testifiable prose helps to create a form of communication that is clear, specific, objective, actionable, comprehensive, testable, logically consistent, accessible, reproducible, and foundational for further analysis.

    These characteristics make testifiable prose a powerful tool for conveying information, arguments, and ideas in a manner that is both reliable and impactful.

    2) CHATGPT 4+ RESPONSE

    The concept of “testifiable prose,” as defined by your criteria, is an approach to writing that emphasizes clarity, precision, and accountability. It’s designed to ensure that every statement can be empirically tested or verified, thus holding the writer to a high standard of truthfulness and reliability. Here’s an analysis of each criterion and what it collectively suggests about testifiable prose:

    1. Complete Sentences
    This ensures that each thought or idea is fully formed and presented in a coherent manner, facilitating clarity and understanding.

    2. In Promissory Form
    Writing in promissory form implies a commitment to delivering specific outcomes or actions. It’s a way of making a clear, actionable promise that can be assessed for fulfillment.

    3. In Testimonial Form
    Incorporating testimonial form means that the prose is based on observable, verifiable facts or experiences. This enhances the credibility and reliability of the information presented.

    4. In Operational Vocabulary (as actions)
    Focusing on actions rather than abstract concepts ensures that the writing is grounded in real-world activities that can be observed, measured, and evaluated.

    5. From an Observer’s Point of View
    Adopting an observer’s perspective ensures objectivity and neutrality, making the prose less biased and more universally verifiable.

    6. Absent the Verb to-be (is, are, was, were…)
    Eliminating the verb “to be” avoids passive constructions and necessitates more precise and active language, which in turn makes the actions and outcomes clearer.

    7. Including All Changes in State
    Detailing all changes in state ensures that the narrative captures the full scope of events or actions, including any transitions or transformations that are crucial for understanding the sequence and impact of actions.

    8. Including All Consequences of Change in State
    By accounting for all consequences of changes in state, the prose commits to a comprehensive depiction of outcomes, enabling a thorough assessment of the actions’ impact.

    9. Producing a Series of Testable Transactions
    This criterion aims for the prose to result in statements that can be empirically tested or verified, grounding the narrative in factual accuracy and accountability.

    Collective Implications:

    Empirical Rigor: Testifiable prose demands a high level of empirical rigor, ensuring that every statement is anchored in observable and verifiable reality.

    Accountability: The approach fosters accountability in writing, as each claim or statement made can be tested against real-world outcomes or experiences.

    Clarity and Precision: By adhering to these criteria, the prose becomes clearer and more precise, leaving little room for ambiguity or misinterpretation.

    Action-Oriented: The focus on operational vocabulary and actions ensures that the writing is practical, actionable, and grounded in real-world processes.

    Objective and Unbiased: Writing from an observer’s perspective and emphasizing testable transactions promotes an objective and unbiased approach to conveying information.

    In summary, testifiable prose is a disciplined writing approach designed to enhance the clarity, accuracy, and reliability of information, making it particularly valuable in fields where empirical evidence and accountability are paramount.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-03-07 23:54:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1765888905516105728

  • P-Law for Dummies (repost) Learn the dimensions of consistency necessary for cla

    P-Law for Dummies
    (repost)

    Learn the dimensions of consistency necessary for claims one has performed the due diligence against ignorance, error, bias, and deceit that are necessary for claims of testimonial truth: categorical(identity), logical(internally consistent), operational (operationally possible), empirical (correspondent), rational(choice), reciprocal (moral) consistency, limits, completeness, and coherence.

    Learn how to disambiguate by operationalization and serialization of terms into series (types) so that conflation and subsequent errors and deceits of conflation and inference are impossible. This will unite the different fields into a common vocabulary.

    Learn how to write in complete, promissory, operational vocabulary, free of the verb to be (eliminate pretense of knowledge) – this will unite the fields into a common grammar.

    Write definitions in that operational vocabulary and grammar that describe man and mankind from the individual to the species to prevent misrepresentation.

    Take the natural law of tort (demonstrated interest), the demand for reciprocity as a test of decidability in matters of conflict (productive, fully informed, voluntary transfer, free of negative externality, warrantied, and within limits of restitution possible by the actors.)

    Write all constitution, legislation, regulation, and finding of the courts in this language, grammar, and programmatic structure

    Restate the constitution, and in particular the bill of rights in these strictly constructed terms, closed to arbitrary interpretation, to fully enumerate all rights, obligations, and inalienability of those rights and obligations.

    Expand the law of fraud from commercial speech to political (and academic) speech, in public, in matters public, to the public, and grant universal standing in matters of the commons. (Reduce the barrier to class actions against false, and irreciprocal speech

    Plug the primary hole in western law of tort that was exploited during the twentieth century: Criminalize baiting into hazard using false and unwarrantable promise. The effect of this will be to suppress lying by the state, the financial sector, the commercial sector, the media, the academy,

    Restore universal applicability so that those issuing legislation, regulation, and findings of the court, are liable for their actions, prohibiting violation of the constitution and strict construction.

    Require the court assent all legislation and regulation. Provide means by which the undecidable is returned to the legislature for settlement – rather than the court.

    This sequence will outlaw the entire postwar attempt to reverse the Darwinian revolution that explained, and justified western civilizations’ thousands of years of self domestication with criteria for reproduction, and aggressive hanging of criminals, dragging mankind out of ignorance, superstition, poverty, hard labor, starvation, disease, and the vicissitudes of nature by the false promises of french socialism, german secular theology, jewish marxism, neo-marxism, postmodernism, feminism, and human-biodiversity-denialism, that are positioned as a war against european supremacy – but is nothing more than the attempt to end the reason for the west (and east asia’s) success: Self domestication through negative eugenics (limiting underclass reproduction and survival) are more important than even education and literacy and the primary diver for raising mankind to its current condition.

    The anti-semitism in Propertarianism is not a genetic criticism, but anti-abrahamic: the use of the abrahamic method of deceit that institutionalized as a group strategy the female means of warfare by undermining from within by the fomentation of conflict between men. Judaism, christianity, and islam, in the old world, and marxism(class warfare to undermine formal institutions), postmodernism (social construction to undermine soft institutions), feminism (to undermine familial institutions), and human science denialism (to undermine the optimum group strategy of ethnocentrism for developing high trust, high investment commons, and high redistribution).

    —“I categorize P as describing the intellectual foundations of western civilization that the populists are currently demanding, but don’t know how to express in rational and scientific terms.”—

    P-law completes the scientific method as one of due diligence; completes the darwinian revolution of decision by competition in evolution; and unites the physical, cognitive, psychological, social, political and economic sciences into one discipline: testimony by realism, naturalism, operationalism, empiricism, rational choice, reciprocity, within limits, completeness, and restitutability.

    This is why we think y’all (Critics) are rather dimwits.
    You latch onto what you grasp.
    You do not seek to understand.
    And in doing so maintain ignorance and immorality and the destruction of western civlization and its benefits to mankind, out of your own laziness and arrogance.

    P completes the Aristotelian project.

    Doolittle is not special. Like Aristotle, Smith, Hume, and Darwin, he is just living at a point in time where cognitive science, Turing’s revolution, economics, and evidence of the past century have combined with the internet’s discount on the acquisition and access to research publications, making possible the completion of the synthesis of disciplines to reform the laws we live under such that we prevent another semitic dark age brought about by the the most advanced system of deception invented by man: the weaponization and institutionalization of the female means of undermining by false promise (seduction) from within.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-03-07 23:10:30 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1765877715096182785

  • (repost) —“Hi Curt, I am greatly intrigued by the submissions in support of your

    (repost)
    —“Hi Curt, I am greatly intrigued by the submissions in support of your work. If you don’t mind, could you kindly illuminate as to the central thesis of this ISM.”—

    [I]n simple terms, it is the completion of the Aristotelian project, by expanding Aristotelian realism, naturalism, and empiricism from the (easy) physical sciences to the (harder) cognitive, psychological, and social sciences by the addition of the grammars (language, metaphysics), operationalism and reciprocity, which we learned in the 20th and 21st century. In modern terms it would mean the completion of the scientific method.

    CENTRAL THESIS:

    1) The human grammatical facility consists of continuous recursive disambiguation. We construct meaning, transfer meaning, then falsify meaning against error, in iterations.

    All knowledge evolves by the same method:

    Stimulus (observation > auto-association > model > prediction > intuition > valuation) > FreeAssociation (Test by reason) > Hypothesis (test by logic) > Theory (test by action) > Convention (Test by Adversarialism – Survival in the market for Application)

    2) All language consists of measurements that are precise, sufficient, and true, or imprecise, insufficient, and false.

    3) Those measurements consist of combinations of human faculties: a) sensation, b) perception, c) intuition, d) reason-calculation-computation, e) action. And we can, and have, disassembled all language into those dimensions. And those dimensions are limited. And they also include limited precision (ex: always has been, has been for some time, just has been, is being, just will be, will be for some time, always as been.)

    3) We can deflate all language into pure measurements (mathematics), or inflate language into narrations, or inflate language into deceptions: a) loading, framing, obscuring, suggesting, b) fictions c) sophistry->idealism spectrum, d) magic->pseudoscience spectrum, and d) occult->supernatural spectrum. We reorganize the definition of language to refer to each of these as grammars that include permissible dimensions and the logics possible within those permissible dimensions.

    4) Because of this, we can create a most parsimonious, universally commensurable, value-neutral language across all fields, by conversion of all speech regardless of dimension into measurements using human faculties, in promissory form, in complete sentences, absent the word to be, from an observer’s point of view, in operational language, consisting of a complete list of complete changes in state.

    5) We can create a checklist of due diligences to test this value neutral universal language for those dimensions of constant relations (logical consistency) possible for humans: identity, logical, empirical, operational, rational, reciprocal, limited, fully accounted within those limits, and if it passes those tests it is not false. Then we must ask if it is sufficient to meet the demand for infallibility for the question at hand, and with in the limits of liability if we err.

    6) This resulting language and method looks a great deal like writing contract law in programming language for very good reasons that are probably obvious: operational logic of actions (engineering) versus set logic of language (scripture, law, text). Far greater precision and far greater exposure of false claims due to ignorance.

    7) We can write constitutions and laws in this language that prevent the use of every possible method of deceit, and therefore extend our law from defense of physical property to defense of information itself. The idea being that we can end immoral and false commercial, academic, and political speech (where religious speech is also political), so that the people are not constantly lied to by everyone.

    The result? Eradication of deceit from the informational commons. Resulting in Trust, Personal, Social, economic, political velocity resulting in prosperity (and greater equality).

    SECONDLY

    It explains the ((())) method of destroying civilizations from within by fomenting hatred using the female technique of undermining false promise baiting into hazard, under plausible deniability and freedom from liability.

    In this case it is to blame white people for adapting to the physical, natural, and evolutionary laws of the universe, which by design ends their ability to operate as an organized crime family.

    It also explains the success of marxism, neo-marxism, postmodernism, feminism, human difference denialism, political correctness, and shouting down – destruction of harmony of european peoples.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-03-07 23:03:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1765876067967909889