—“Then please explain [ insert absurd moronic, sophomoric, pseudoscientific, ahistorical, or supernatural claim here ].”—- An Idiot
1. Please explain how you possess sufficient knowledge to make any such judgement. 2.Please explain why anything I would say would alter your conviction. 3. No I will not feed your desire for attention and false self confidence. 4. And yes, I’m a genius – which should be obvious.
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-18 02:03:11 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174141788564676608
Reply addressees: @PAINSCOURT @StevePender
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174137782631112704
IN REPLY TO:
@PAINSCOURT
@curtdoolittle @StevePender Please explain genius how 2 random acts yielded 4 identical results twin towers struck by planes and buildings 6 & 7.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174137782631112704
TESTIMONY
by Bill Joslin
humans swim in a sea of testimony. Any information we gather beyond local and immediate scale as been gained through the testimony of others.
Because this is akin… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=467713383825557&id=100017606988153
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-17 23:37:13 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174105055521386496
TESTIMONY
by Bill Joslin
humans swim in a sea of testimony. Any information we gather beyond local and immediate scale as been gained through the testimony of others.
Because this is akin to the air we breath we often overlook the drastic impact that testimony plays in nearly all of our decisions, choices and actions.
If given a truly sincere analysis in this vein, the very foundations of our personal realities may be shaken to a degree that i can only describe as akin to the fear of death.
Coupling this realization with the fraud that our memories often play on us (memory just being self-testimony), the importance of operationalism (in thought and deed) and self authoring based upon operationalism becomes paramount and weighed second only to our instinct to survive (because information remains a critical component to our ability to survive)
…which is why testimonialism receives such resistance… it cuts through the denial of our ignorance which we like to cover with a venier of certainty.
…oh how deeply we rely upon our trust in others and oh how we like to hide this fact from ourselves…
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-17 19:37:00 UTC
I Think Philosophy is Closed. https://propertarianism.com/2019/09/17/i-think-philosophy-is-closed/
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-17 18:39:23 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174030100494454784
I think the demarcation between truth(decidability) and choice (preference) is complete. Philosophy now only tells us choice, while law (reciprocity), science(consistency correspondence, and coherence), and mathematics(measurement) provide decidability regardless of choice. The top of the epistemic pyramid is not philosophy(rationalism) but testimony, law, science, mathematics, and the logic faculty in a consistent coherent ontology. While philosophy (arbitrary ontology) has nothing to say but choice. In other words, Law (cooperation) science (evidence), mathematics(measurement) are merely an extension of testimony. Which is why the west developed them. We are the only people that base our law entirely on sovereignty and therefore we have no other choice but testimony, law, science and math for decidability.
I think the demarcation between truth(decidability) and choice (preference) is complete. Philosophy now only tells us choice, while law (reciprocity), science(consistency correspondence, and coherence), and mathematics(measurement) provide decidability regardless of choice. The top of the epistemic pyramid is not philosophy(rationalism) but testimony, law, science, mathematics, and the logic faculty in a consistent coherent ontology. While philosophy (arbitrary ontology) has nothing to say but choice. In other words, Law (cooperation) science (evidence), mathematics(measurement) are merely an extension of testimony. Which is why the west developed them. We are the only people that base our law entirely on sovereignty and therefore we have no other choice but testimony, law, science and math for decidability.
They are cases of application. Theories of observations (facts), theories of application (theories), evidence of application (laws), evidence of parsimony (coherence). A position is a preference. One does not take a position on the science. One falsifies it – or fails to.
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-17 17:51:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174017952066265089
Reply addressees: @Brian_Alford @DineshDSouza
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1173962862533824512
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1173962862533824512
Rule of Law, Truthful (testimonial) Public Speech, Economics(cherry picking), Mathematics (DSGEM), Demographic Distribution(IQ), Heterogeneity(conflict), Family Formation, Intergenerational Family, Class, Gender, Eugenics. Or simply: full accounting of changes human capital. …
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-17 13:56:55 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1173959016445296640
Reply addressees: @Brian_Alford @DineshDSouza
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1173956359676559361
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1173956359676559361
TESTIMONY IS THE BASIS OF OUR CIVILIZATION
—“Testimony … that’s pretty cool as a basis for civilization. Never would have thought of it that way.”—Michael Churchill
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-17 13:54:00 UTC