Theme: Truth

  • We must only know whether we are using the sufficient degree of precision for th

    We must only know whether we are using the sufficient degree of precision for the question, whether we lack information for, or are ignorant of, further precision, or whether we are obscuring greater precision for dishonest purposes. Theology uses all three – unfortunately.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-03 11:33:26 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179721114756505600

    Reply addressees: @undercoverhere1

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179720554208739330


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @undercoverhere1 It’s just a degree of precision:Analogy (wisdom) for broad, Virtues for less broad, General Rules for narrower, Law for narrower, science for narrower, and math for narrowest. This range allows us graceful increase and decrease in precision – or dishonestly, to obscure precision.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1179720554208739330


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @undercoverhere1 It’s just a degree of precision:Analogy (wisdom) for broad, Virtues for less broad, General Rules for narrower, Law for narrower, science for narrower, and math for narrowest. This range allows us graceful increase and decrease in precision – or dishonestly, to obscure precision.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1179720554208739330

  • Wisdom literature is awesome. Fairy Tales, Myths, Legends, all use unknown force

    Wisdom literature is awesome. Fairy Tales, Myths, Legends, all use unknown forces to educate us. That’s just different from using wisdom (advice) as truth (decidability). One cannot deduce in argument from such premises. But one can seek counsel, and give counsel with wisdom.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-03 11:28:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179719922726969349

    Reply addressees: @undercoverhere1

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179715554426413058


    IN REPLY TO:

    @necturusmaculos

    @curtdoolittle I am not a supernaturalist according to the definition Curt gave in this post, but there are supernaturalists who have produced content that I appreciate.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179715554426413058

  • TRUTH BEFORE FACE (sensitive but true topic warning) (this is advanced political

    TRUTH BEFORE FACE

    (sensitive but true topic warning)

    (this is advanced political theory, read at your own risk)

    Postmodernism(Political Correctness, Denial of Cultural Racial and Class Differences) and Feminism(Denial of Gender Differences) are attempts to undermine the uniqueness of western civilization’s MALES. Males who speak Truth before Face, Truth Regardless of Status, Truth Regardless of offense; Truth regardless of the Competence Hierarchy, Truth regardless of the Dominance Hierarchy.

    The entirety of our way of life, Rule of Law, Sovereignty, Reciprocity and Jury and the reason, science, and technology that arose from it, are dependent upon the ond thing western men do that no other people do: and that is to report and report alone by speaking martial, empirical, testimonial, truth before face – anyone’s face – regardless of cost to self or others. This is the highest cost an individual can pay for his civilization. And institutionalizing it has only been done once: at the origins of western civilization, thousands of years ago.

    Why the change: women cannot bear it, that is why they are easy victims and practitioners of feminism and postmodernism. Women fight one another by undermining with words. So among women, because they have had so little time in the public sphere, truth before face has not been institutionalized. And just as women were sold christianity in the ancient world, they have been sold postmodernism and feminism in the modern world. And because they (a) spend 80% of the income (b) spend the majority of money (on unscientific non-STEM courses) in university, (c) consume 80% of tax revenues, (d) white women are the only group that defects against their males, and vote against truth before face, against meritocracy, and against defense of the commons from consumption. They have the entire Cathedral Complex (State, Academy, Media, Finance) working to cater to their denial, and doing so by degradation of men, truth before face, rule of law, and the entire western edifice that has made women’s freedom from labor and servitude possible.

    We spent millenia outlawing male anti-social behavior, but we have ceased outlawing female anti-social behavior, and face before truth, denial, and undermining are anti-social behaviors that must, like violence, be equally suppressed.

    That’s what our Natural Law did, and that’s what it must do again.

    It’s a test of Reciprocity: If men may not undermine by violence and force, women may not undermine by denial, gossiping, rallying, shaming, psychologizing, moralizing, ridiculing, and will limit themselves to truthful reciprocal speech, not disapproval and undermining as a substitute for truthful speech. If not then men will return the favor with their method of undermining, and then both genders lose.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-03 10:25:00 UTC

  • WESTERN MEN USE TRUTH BEFORE FACE. POMO’S UNDERMINE IT. THEY USE WOMEN TO DO IT.

    WESTERN MEN USE TRUTH BEFORE FACE. POMO’S UNDERMINE IT. THEY USE WOMEN TO DO IT. BE A MAN.

    —“Stefan Molyneux: Every day you go out of your way to insult someone. People who come to your channel genuinely curious about what you may have to say quickly realize you were just another internet troll. There are too many of those. Be something different.”—SufficientlyWhelmed@SufficientlyWh1

    You apparently have been feminized so that you don’t understand the optimum means of masculine education: King of the Hill games. You also don’t understand the enemy’s undermining by GSRRM and how Stefan counter-signals it all day long. If you are turned off then you don’t matter.

    It’s hard to face the fact that you don’t matter. But if you won’t put Truth Before Face, you are in fact, an enemy of the uniqueness of western civilization.Truth before Face is the highest cost we pay, and the left has sought to undermine it – because it’s our civ’s foundation.

    The purpose of the marxist program was to bait decivilization with false promise and pseudoscience. It didn’t work. But Women naturally use face-before-truth, and by selling it to women and undesirable men, political correctness is simply undermining Truth before Face.

    So please man up and stop being a useful idiot. Truth before Face, Reciprocity, Sovereignty, and Jury is the foundation of western civilization.

    Stop helping the enemy by virtue signaling.

    Pay the cost of maintaining Truth Before Face.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-03 08:18:00 UTC

  • Move the audience along and avoid the WN/Fascist/Racist argument by simply focus

    Move the audience along and avoid the WN/Fascist/Racist argument by simply focusing on truth and reciprocity and rule of law.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-02 21:52:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179514415999311878

    Reply addressees: @nl7719 @StefanMolyneux @philosophicart @MrsMMissy @JohnMarkSays @WorMartiN @alaindwight @ThruTheHayes @MartianHoplite

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179514020040249344


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @nl7719 @StefanMolyneux @philosophicart @MrsMMissy @JohnMarkSays @WorMartiN @alaindwight @ThruTheHayes @MartianHoplite So this provides Stefan with an opportunity not only for himself but to explain the differences to the audience – which is the function of a host. Proxy for the audience.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1179514020040249344


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @nl7719 @StefanMolyneux @philosophicart @MrsMMissy @JohnMarkSays @WorMartiN @alaindwight @ThruTheHayes @MartianHoplite So this provides Stefan with an opportunity not only for himself but to explain the differences to the audience – which is the function of a host. Proxy for the audience.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1179514020040249344

  • Easily, because negotiating a shared frame of reference (understanding) doesn’t

    Easily, because negotiating a shared frame of reference (understanding) doesn’t require much time or effort. Stefan is quite bright and has a broad base of knowledge much of which is shared. This means one to three propositions create a pattern from which the rest is obvious.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-02 21:49:25 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179513743056744448

    Reply addressees: @nl7719 @StefanMolyneux @philosophicart @MrsMMissy @JohnMarkSays @WorMartiN @alaindwight @ThruTheHayes @MartianHoplite

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179512748750884865


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179512748750884865

  • That is why we should have a conversation – so that you can move on. It’s the co

    That is why we should have a conversation – so that you can move on. It’s the conversation many have asked us to have. Start: What is the market demand for definition of morality categorized as property, sufficient to resolve disputes vs end in retaliation cycles? For Polities?


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-02 20:32:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179494418317021184

    Reply addressees: @StefanMolyneux @philosophicart @MrsMMissy

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179442489410895873


    IN REPLY TO:

    @StefanMolyneux

    @curtdoolittle @philosophicart @MrsMMissy Rothbard? As in Murray?

    Nonsense.

    How so?

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179442489410895873

  • Biz: You’re witty, entertaining, educational and providing truthfulness as self

    Biz: You’re witty, entertaining, educational and providing truthfulness as self help. But for present revenue, I think your “Promise” has to shift to collective help(leadership), because the money is chasing the political. Peterson made hole. Fill it.
    @StefanMolyneux


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-02 15:38:43 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179420454718754817

  • Well done. Now state that this “competition” is how our brains solve problems an

    Well done. Now state that this “competition” is how our brains solve problems and the only possible epistemic methodology and you’re there. Again. Well done.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-02 14:10:15 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179398191462191107

    Reply addressees: @BrianTakita

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179393670035988480


    IN REPLY TO:

    @BrianTakita

    axiom (pertaining to creation/engineering/bottom-up) & theory (pertaining to observation/analysis/top-down). These definitions of axiom & theory seem heuristically true. Will need to explore different cases demarcating axiom & theory…
    @curtdoolittle
    https://t.co/g6oPAdB7hK

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179393670035988480

  • The underclasses once again rebel against western truth for this reason, as do s

    The underclasses once again rebel against western truth for this reason, as do single women.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-02 02:56:46 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179228701571080192

    Reply addressees: @demontage2000 @JohnMarkSays @TOOEdit

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179227821513814018


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @demontage2000 @JohnMarkSays @TOOEdit The left invented desirable denial, sophism and pseudoscience. The postwar right doubled down on moralizing, b/c they were as afraid of admitting western civ is eugenic as the left was of eugenics. It invalidated democracy as national virtue narrative, in addition to the church.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1179227821513814018


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @demontage2000 @JohnMarkSays @TOOEdit The left invented desirable denial, sophism and pseudoscience. The postwar right doubled down on moralizing, b/c they were as afraid of admitting western civ is eugenic as the left was of eugenics. It invalidated democracy as national virtue narrative, in addition to the church.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1179227821513814018