Curt Doolittle

Theme: Truth

  • OPERATIONALIZING AN ARGUMENT FOR THE PRESERVATION OF MALINVESTMENT IN PRIORS (ex

    OPERATIONALIZING AN ARGUMENT FOR THE PRESERVATION OF MALINVESTMENT IN PRIORS

    (example of faith or other desirable false beliefs)

    —“My solution is values testing. Which turns out to be epistemology testing. Meaning being downstream from epistemology, and values are downstream from meaning. The semiotic link between concept, word and thing cannot be broken in empiricism. Redefinition of terms that you see in certain critiques doesn’t negate the original concept; rather it creates a void to be filled by a new word, or rejection of the modified definition. Test for empiricism. “— Andrew M Gilmour

    I am sure that makes some sort of sense to you but I can’t translate it into truthful speech.

    So lets operationalize it and see what happens:

    “My solution to (some problem or other) consists in testing (some kind of, category of, some individual or group’s) values. Truthful statements require knowledge individuals don’t possess, cannot obtain, cannot ford to obtain, or are unwilling to obtain, so they substitute (whatever set of constant relations between senses, associations with objects, contexts, locations, and valued returns) is within their memories (experience and therefore meaning). The individual’s association between the constant relations produced by some mark, display, word or action, and cumulative prior associations currently in memory (concept), are not falsified or replaced or informed by evidence (experience) accumulated using physical and logical instrumentation we use to test our sense perception, free association, and reason, and to falsify, confirm, or evolve those same associations (categories). The use of Operational Language, wherein each sequential action whether physical, rational, or logical, is subjectively testable, does nothing to reorganize collections of constant relations (concepts), and the paradigms upon which those prior and new associations depend by the same means of cumulative associations. Instead (some individual, some people, some group) will always attempt to defend the newly falsified, confirmed, revised topic so that it remains unchanged, and instead, (whomever) will seek to preserve (whomever’s) investment in existing paradigms (constant relations, theories, narratives), by finding and fitting a new set of constant relations, and name them, into his previous paradigms, rather than reform his paradigms. This is because (some reason or other) people do not want to learn but preserve their paradigms regardless of how completely they are falsified. The reason is that for some reason, some percentage of the population seeks the psychological comfort of some paradigm over the more parsimonious (truthful) paradigm.”

    Well, you just described the reason for choosing not to learn because of the addiction to faith, or not learning because of addiction to some other means of preserving psychological self image or social status or pretense of sexual, social, economic, political, military market value, that is counter to competitive reality. When under all but physically developmental illnesses, cognitive behavioral therapy under care can correct every known one of them.

    I also agree that this is the definition of mental illness.

    And I also agree this is the dominant position of the excessively empathic (feminine) mind when in a condition of vulnerability.)

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-24 15:43:00 UTC

  • “WHAT DO YOU MEAN BY FALSIFICATION? (IN COURT)” —“I don’t think I understand w

    “WHAT DO YOU MEAN BY FALSIFICATION? (IN COURT)”

    —“I don’t think I understand what you mean by “falsification.” I doubt you mean it in the Popperian sense because it is entirely possible to put questions before the judiciary that pray for verification, rather than falsification. And falsification does not just happen on the basis of substantive “operational” concerns but also on matters of legal or administrative procedure.”— Duke Newcomb (awesome alias)

    DEFINITION OF FALSIFICATION

    No amount of justification or confirmation provides us with satisfaction of demand for infallibility given the question at hand. Only due diligence by attempted falsification of identity, internal consistency, operational possibility, rational choice, reciprocity, external correspondence, completeness, full accounting, parsimony, and coherence.

    JURIDICAL FALSIFICATION

    The jury and judge do not find a matter of truth or falsehood, but sufficient falsification of alternatives to render a judgement of under reasonable doubt.

    REGARDING ‘PROOF’

    In law, “Proof” does not exist because existential reality is not constructed axiomatically and not closed – so we only use the term by analogy. Instead, we are providing a theory (argument) and evidence (external correspondence) that alternative explanations (theories) are unreasonable (fail to satisfy the demand for consistency, possibility, rationality, correspondence, full accounting, and parsimony.

    This confusion is possible because of the inarticulate vocabulary of legal jargon that is non-operational, and not constructed from the tests of demonstrated interest, or court insured property constructed by demonstrated interest, or reciprocity, or argued under testimonial truth. This is what P-law provides: disambiguation and operationalization, and therefore scientifically stated, internally consistent, law (rules of jurisprudence).

    RESULTS OF FALSIFICATION

    Restating your claim in scientific prose: It is possible to test a theory by putting a question before the judiciary and determining whether or not they falsify it. All that it tells us is that it survived falsification or not. Nothing else.

    WHAT ABOUT PROCEDURE?

    Legal and administrative procedure have nothing to do with truth or falsehood, but with regulation. Whether those regulations affect truth, falsehood, or reciprocity, irreciprocity is a matter of convenience (cost) for the court and nothing to do with truth and reciprocity.

    CAUSAL RELATIONS

    The Natural Law of Reciprocity > A constitution for operational under it > a judiciary for adjudicating differences under it > Procedures (regulations) demanded by the court (often arbitrary, often pragmatic, but not always) < regulations (enforcement of, proceduralization of, legislation and command) < Legislation (contract or command) < Command.

    A SMART GUY GETS IT RIGHT AWAY

    —“Ah. It is not the proposition before the trier of fact that is falsified, it is the alternatives. And they are not falsified in the sense of having their falsehood established. They are falsified in the sense of being inferior in their explanatory power of the facts of the matter before deliberation to the preferred theory of the case. By falsification, you mean the process of reasoning to the best (most apparently reasonable) legal theory on the basis of the best evidence. Got it.”— Duke Newcomb

    Impressive. Uncommon. Rare case of fully grasping it. Nice work.

    The Darwinian survival of theories of causality in the competitive market for infallibility of juridical decisions given the harm caused and restitution demanded.

    —end—

    ( FYI: Daniel Roland Anderson: Another one with potential? )

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-24 15:08:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/75010622_491870861409809_74259789556

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/75010622_491870861409809_742597895563247616_o_491870858076476.jpg PLS DON’T WASTE MY TIME OR OTHERS WITH BLDG7 CONSPIRACY THEORY

    (Yes I know more that you do – as usual )

    The primary lessons are:

    (a) as usual, only one structural member failed, leading to the cascade, and the structural failure was due to accumulation of heat over many hours. The external damage had no effect on the collapse. It was just the fire.

    (b) engineering standards and calculations for steel structures were too loose given the possible duration of fires.

    (c) ordinary office combustibles provide long term sources of heat at slow burn necessary to accumulate heat in structural members.

    (d) if the sprinklers had been active it’s unlikely the combustibles would have been able to produce accumulated heat, and therefore sprinklers must not be dependent upon external sources of pressure and power in the event of a catastrophe. ie: external infrastructure is a weak link not a discount, and structures must meet closer to greek standards (10x max expected load) than the max load calculations at present, and harmonics make the matter far worse. Make buildings more expensive and there will be fewer of them, and better. Require resident ownership in urban centers and end rental income. Expand underground transport, police the cars aggressively, and if necessary create class -based cars requiring escalating positive behavior.

    (PS: Why do you think I know that a civil war punishing urban areas is so easy to win? Anyone overloading emergency services in any urban area will succeed. Multiple urban areas cannot provide mutual support under adverse conditions. Without communication and data, organization of response is all but impossible -bottlenecked.)PLS DON’T WASTE MY TIME OR OTHERS WITH BLDG7 CONSPIRACY THEORY

    (Yes I know more that you do – as usual )

    The primary lessons are:

    (a) as usual, only one structural member failed, leading to the cascade, and the structural failure was due to accumulation of heat over many hours. The external damage had no effect on the collapse. It was just the fire.

    (b) engineering standards and calculations for steel structures were too loose given the possible duration of fires.

    (c) ordinary office combustibles provide long term sources of heat at slow burn necessary to accumulate heat in structural members.

    (d) if the sprinklers had been active it’s unlikely the combustibles would have been able to produce accumulated heat, and therefore sprinklers must not be dependent upon external sources of pressure and power in the event of a catastrophe. ie: external infrastructure is a weak link not a discount, and structures must meet closer to greek standards (10x max expected load) than the max load calculations at present, and harmonics make the matter far worse. Make buildings more expensive and there will be fewer of them, and better. Require resident ownership in urban centers and end rental income. Expand underground transport, police the cars aggressively, and if necessary create class -based cars requiring escalating positive behavior.

    (PS: Why do you think I know that a civil war punishing urban areas is so easy to win? Anyone overloading emergency services in any urban area will succeed. Multiple urban areas cannot provide mutual support under adverse conditions. Without communication and data, organization of response is all but impossible -bottlenecked.)

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-24 11:51:00 UTC

  • IT’S BECAUSE BAD RELIGIONS LIE AND LAG, GOOD RELIGIONS USE TRUTH AND LEAD —“Al

    IT’S BECAUSE BAD RELIGIONS LIE AND LAG, GOOD RELIGIONS USE TRUTH AND LEAD

    —“All religions are made up bullshit to control people”—Joanna

    Hmmm… Let’s look at this:

    PERSONAL DEMAND

    . Demand for personal mindfulness

    . . Demand for interpersonal mindfulness

    . . . Demand for social mindfulness

    . . . . Demand for political mindfulness

    POLITICAL DEMAND

    .. organization (control, conflict suppression)

    .. .. vs educate (helpful system of measurement)

    .. .. .. vs create a polity (helpful system of measurement)

    .. .. .. .. vs create a justification for conquest (not so helpful)

    TECHNOLOGICAL DEMAND

    …Religion (oral parable) is the optimum means of education prior to writing.

    … … Organized religion (written parable) is dependent upon writing and argument, but not literacy

    … … … Natural Law is dependent upon literacy, logic and science.

    CURRENT CONDITION

    So yeah, but they were the only technology available.

    We have

    … Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (Repair)

    … … Self Authoring Virtues (Stoic Method) (improve)

    … … … Self Choice (epicureanism – living well within means)

    … … … … Natural law of Reciprocity, Independent Judiciary

    … … … … … History, Reason, science, technology, prosperity.

    CURRENT TECHNOLOGY

    And we can use:

    … Heroic History of Western (or man’s) Ascent

    … … Stoic Ritual, Hero/Saint ‘worship’ (thanks, counsel)

    … … … Religion: Lesson (history), Play (ritual), Thanks (worship, prayer), Oath(promise), Feast (communal reward), Festival (communal celebration), Sport (community bonding).

    … … … … Civic Participation: Family, Jury, Commons Production, emergency service production; Hospitaliers Production, and Defense (war) production.

    … … … … … The Natural Law of Reciprocity, an independent judiciary, and a jury of our peers.

    REASON

    … Because we have ancestors worthy of our debt to them, and because we can create (easily) our debt to one another.

    STRATEGY

    “Embrace, conquer, and domesticate reality – together – do not cower from it.”

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-24 10:33:00 UTC

  • “GSRRM” RESPONSE —“f–cking madness…”—@meta_slayer It’s genius actually. I

    “GSRRM” RESPONSE

    —“f–cking madness…”—@meta_slayer

    It’s genius actually. It’s describing the female conflcit strategy of undermining truth plus the abrahamic sophism of false promise,… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=491528644777364&id=100017606988153

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-24 04:19:24 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187222032653672448

  • It’s genius actually. It’s describing the female conflcit strategy of underminin

    It’s genius actually. It’s describing the female conflcit strategy of undermining truth plus the abrahamic sophism of false promise, baiting in to hazard, profiting from that hazard, and defending it with pilpul, critique, & pretense of innocence under cover of voluntary choice.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-24 04:17:24 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187221527982460928

    Reply addressees: @meta_slayer @RenegadePlayboy

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187127639443673088

    IN REPLY TO:

    @meta_slayer

    @RenegadePlayboy fucking madness…

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187127639443673088

  • “GSRRM” RESPONSE —“f–cking madness…”—@meta_slayer It’s genius actually. I

    “GSRRM” RESPONSE

    —“f–cking madness…”—@meta_slayer

    It’s genius actually. It’s describing the female conflcit strategy of undermining truth plus the abrahamic sophism of false promise, baiting in to hazard, profiting from that hazard, and defending it with pilpul, critique, & pretense of innocence under cover of voluntary choice.

    I don’t make errors. Ever. It’s my job not to.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-24 00:19:00 UTC

  • What Group, Nation, Civilization, Or Religion, has not done everything in its po

    What Group, Nation, Civilization, Or Religion, has not done everything in its power to resist the British Empirical and Scientific revolution in epistemic, psychological, social, economic,… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=491391741457721&id=100017606988153

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-23 23:54:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187155443392679936

  • Doesn’t really matter. Christian, Jewish, Muslim, Hindu, Chinese Nationalist, or

    Doesn’t really matter. Christian, Jewish, Muslim, Hindu, Chinese Nationalist, or african revisionist. It’s the same: every people resists testimonial truth or what we call science.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-23 23:46:00 UTC

  • It’s antithetical to the female intuition which decides by approval or disapprov

    It’s antithetical to the female intuition which decides by approval or disapproval and proportionality instead of truth falsehood and reciprocity – b/c in the end those are men’s problems: production and war. Econ is counterintuitive to her nervous system unless to redistribute.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-23 20:42:19 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187107003300225032

    Reply addressees: @TheEconomist

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1186821609627275264

    IN REPLY TO:

    @TheEconomist

    Economics is even less popular among girls than maths https://t.co/vorokeIWPZ

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1186821609627275264