Theme: Truth

  • There is a reason the left developed social construction. It’s because the left’

    There is a reason the left developed social construction. It’s because the left’s reality is social and verbal, not empirical and analytical. It’s that they are INCAPABLE of empirical… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=518749808721914&id=100017606988153


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-30 19:01:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1200852294960631809

  • If any statement in psychology, social science, law, ethics, politics, is incomp

    If any statement in psychology, social science, law, ethics, politics, is incompatible or in conflict with those laws, then it’s false.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-30 18:28:10 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1200843982126952448

    Reply addressees: @DegenRolf

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1200843177160249344


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @DegenRolf There are a limited number of dimensions of group competition: (n) Predation( mongols, islam), parasitism (gypsies, jews, russia, south america), production and trade (germanic european), production and autarky (france, eastern europe, india, china, japan).

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1200843177160249344


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @DegenRolf There are a limited number of dimensions of group competition: (n) Predation( mongols, islam), parasitism (gypsies, jews, russia, south america), production and trade (germanic european), production and autarky (france, eastern europe, india, china, japan).

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1200843177160249344

  • in famous words: “That’s not an argument.” You can think some alternative is pos

    in famous words: “That’s not an argument.”
    You can think some alternative is possible, but then you’d have to make an argument for the alternative. Usually it’s christian luancy or anarchist lunacy or marxist lunacy.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-30 18:02:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1200837551793344514

    Reply addressees: @KSSS

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1200808633329758209


    IN REPLY TO:

    @KSSS

    @curtdoolittle pseudo intellectual.. or maybe not pseudo but down the wrong road. blinded

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1200808633329758209

  • It is not always obvious what some whacko will interpret from prose

    It is not always obvious what some whacko will interpret from prose.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-30 15:32:00 UTC

  • TRUTH BEFORE FACE, AND OUR WAY OF LIFE, AND THE ABRAHAMIC UNDERMINING OF CIVILIZ

    TRUTH BEFORE FACE, AND OUR WAY OF LIFE, AND THE ABRAHAMIC UNDERMINING OF CIVILIZATION AND MANKIND

    0) KANTIAN IMPERATIVE: “Act only according to that maxim whereby you can, at the same time,… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=518599098736985&id=100017606988153


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-30 14:46:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1200788186148020224

  • It would be nice to see some evidence. 😉

    It would be nice to see some evidence. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-30 14:14:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1200780022103060480

    Reply addressees: @WALLABEEDON

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1200696554085965824


    IN REPLY TO:

    @WALLABEEDON

    @curtdoolittle No.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1200696554085965824

  • There is a reason the left developed social construction. It’s because the left’

    There is a reason the left developed social construction. It’s because the left’s reality is social and verbal, not empirical and analytical. It’s that they are INCAPABLE of empirical analytical, reciprocal, concepts. They just WANT. WHich is what primitive females did to animate primitive males. The difference is we aren’t getting sex in return from liberals. They have nothing to sell. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-30 14:01:00 UTC

  • TRUTH BEFORE FACE, AND OUR WAY OF LIFE, AND THE ABRAHAMIC UNDERMINING OF CIVILIZ

    TRUTH BEFORE FACE, AND OUR WAY OF LIFE, AND THE ABRAHAMIC UNDERMINING OF CIVILIZATION AND MANKIND

    0) KANTIAN IMPERATIVE: “Act only according to that maxim whereby you can, at the same time, will that it should become a universal law” Therefore “Kant denied the right to lie or deceive for any reason, regardless of context or anticipated consequences.”

    1) |TRUTH BEFORE FACE| Truth before Face; Truth Regardless of cost to self-image; Truth Regardless of cost to one’s Status; Truth Regardless of cost of offense; Truth regardless of cost to the Competence Hierarchy, Truth regardless of cost to the Dominance Hierarchy.

    2) FACE (n.)

    ( … )

    a: OUTWARD APPEARANCE

    … …put a good face on it

    b: DISGUISE, PRETENSE

    c … (1): ASSURANCE, CONFIDENCE

    … …maintaining a firm face in spite of adversity

    … …(2): EFFRONTERY

    … …how anyone could have the face to ask that question

    d: DIGNITY, PRESTIGE, STATUS, SELF-IMAGE

    … …afraid to lose face

    THE SECOND DESTRUCTION OF WESTERN CIVILIZATION

    Marxism (Denial of productive value to one another, of subjective value, and of the value of innovation and organization vs labor), Postmodernism (Political Correctness, Denial of Cultural Racial and Class Differences) and Feminism (Denial of Gender Differences) are attempts to undermine the uniqueness of western civilization’s MALES. Males who speak Truth before Face, Truth Regardless of Status, Truth Regardless of offense; Truth regardless of the Competence Hierarchy, Truth regardless of the Dominance Hierarchy.

    The entirety of our way of life, Rule of Law, Sovereignty, Reciprocity and Jury and the reason, science, and technology that arose from it, are dependent upon the one thing western men do that no other people do: and that is to report and report alone by speaking martial, empirical, testimonial, truth before face – anyone’s face – regardless of cost to self or others. This is the highest cost an individual can pay for his civilization. And institutionalizing it has only been done once: at the origins of western civilization, thousands of years ago.

    Why the change: women cannot bear it, that is why they are easy victims and practitioners of feminism and postmodernism. Women fight one another by undermining with words. So among women, because they have had so little time in the public sphere, truth before face has not been institutionalized. And just as women were sold Christianity in the ancient world, they have been sold postmodernism and feminism in the modern world. And because they (a) spend 80% of the income (b) spend the majority of money (on unscientific non-STEM courses) in university, (c) consume 80% of tax revenues, (d) white women are the only group that defects against their males, and vote against truth before face, against meritocracy, and against defense of the commons from consumption. They have the entire Cathedral Complex (State, Academy, Media, Finance) working to cater to their denial, and doing so by the degradation of men, truth before face, rule of law, and the entire western edifice that has made women’s freedom from labor and servitude possible.

    We spent millennia outlawing male anti-social behavior, but we have ceased outlawing female anti-social behavior, and face before truth, denial, and undermining are anti-social behaviors that must, like violence, be equally suppressed.

    That’s what our Natural Law did, and that’s what it must do again.

    It’s a test of Reciprocity: If men may not undermine by violence and force, women may not undermine by denial, gossiping, rallying, shaming, psychologizing, moralizing, ridiculing, and will limit themselves to truthful reciprocal speech, not disapproval and undermining as a substitute for truthful speech. If not then men will return the favor with their method of undermining, and then both genders lose.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-30 09:46:00 UTC

  • So why lie?

    So why lie?


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-30 01:29:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1200587676614836224

    Reply addressees: @BretWeinstein

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1200587616154005505


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @BretWeinstein Isn’t searching for common ground just a means of generating a falsehood? Are you trying to sell a false promise (fraud?)

    People want.

    They’ll exploit the limits of morality at every opportunity for want.

    Desirable polities are scarce.

    And homo-genetic.

    That’s science.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1200587616154005505


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @BretWeinstein Isn’t searching for common ground just a means of generating a falsehood? Are you trying to sell a false promise (fraud?)

    People want.

    They’ll exploit the limits of morality at every opportunity for want.

    Desirable polities are scarce.

    And homo-genetic.

    That’s science.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1200587616154005505

  • Isn’t searching for common ground just a means of generating a falsehood? Are yo

    Isn’t searching for common ground just a means of generating a falsehood? Are you trying to sell a false promise (fraud?)

    People want.

    They’ll exploit the limits of morality at every opportunity for want.

    Desirable polities are scarce.

    And homo-genetic.

    That’s science.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-30 01:29:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1200587616154005505

    Reply addressees: @BretWeinstein

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1199456620960309248


    IN REPLY TO:

    @BretWeinstein

    It’s instructive to see how much difficulty people are having with this assignment…

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1199456620960309248