(re: criticisms)
I am on a mission on behalf of our people in particular, and humanity in general, and have paid a great price for pursuing it.
That mission is to produce a body of law and a judiciary (think an Inquisition) to bring it about the restoration of the *trajectory* of our civilization because of the lessons of our past, not to recreate our past.
And if possible I seek to create the solution and the inspiration to rebel as did our ancestors and restore the natural law to european peoples and restore that trajectory.
Conversely, I do not have a mission to create communities and solve tactical issues that affect our people. But I am happy that people who want to participate with me, us, do. In other words, I recognize that the feeling of making a tangible difference in time is important to others who are on the journey with me over time.
So I encourage these things, these ‘tangible’ goals, to provide fulfillment for others – not because it is central to my mission. I am still not sure it assists my mission or not. Because unless these things result in more judges or more warriors who show up to demand change, every other positive bit of feedback is just therapy.
As such, I do. not find meaning in criticism of the temporality of my efforts. Instead I find virtue in the use of my (now our) work so that those who do want temporal results can achieve them.
If at any time the temporal interests and need for satisfaction (finding of meaning) are counter to my intertemporal interests instead of mutually beneficial, then my mission over time is more important than others’ mission in time.
Yet if we both are achieving satisfaction in pursuit of our missions despite the time horizon of feedback, then we are all succeeding together – which I prefer.
But issuing criticisms or demands that I sacrifice my mission over time, for others missions in time, when the consequences are inversely proportional to outcomes is not something I’m interested in investing in.
Love you all.
It’s a privilege.
CD