—“Seems like” insinuates an association (bad or good, but usually bad) without putting forth any capital or reliable information to back your claim. The classic “I don’t really know, but I think I know, ya know?”–Zack Passmore
(It’s an attempt to undermine without warrantying your words.)
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-30 19:51:00 UTC
PATTERNS OF IMPORT
by Bill Joslin.
Like epistemology and ethics, graceful failure applies here.
Epistemology
1. With perfect (adequate) information – science, empiricism
2. With partial information we fall back on heuristics (rules of thumb) – coherence and internal consistency
3. Without adequate information we fall back on faith, intuition
Ethics:
1. With adequate information – consequentialism
2. with partial information – virtue ethics
3. without adequate information – deontic ethics (duty to rules)
Identity
1. With high-trust commons (accumulated social capital) – Civ nat (demonstrated shared values)
2. with partial trust – ethnicity (shared traditions and culture)
3. in absence of trust – biology (race gender etc)
These are matters of proximity as well:
1. In close knit isolated communities – if approached by a stranger
2. far distance – race (low resolution friend foe detection)
3. mid distance – clothing cultural clues (mid resolution)
4. close distance – behavior (high resolution)
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-30 18:18:00 UTC
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/84152542_195287838536044_6446766187836604416_o_195287835202711.jpg I know. I understand. It’s hard to tell if I’m bullshitting or not. But people who know their subject, can tell the difference. I know my Sh—t. 😉 P is work. But it it’s life altering in explanatory power. The world will make sense like never before.I know. I understand. It’s hard to tell if I’m bullshitting or not. But people who know their subject, can tell the difference. I know my Sh—t. 😉 P is work. But it it’s life altering in explanatory power. The world will make sense like never before.
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-30 18:08:00 UTC
(Selected Bill Joslin Notes on Curt’s Methods and His Critics)
Many criticisms are residue from king of the hill games and Curt’s research methods.
Curt will take a position and argue it, just to cause debate. Then through the subsequent “battles” the ideas that survive tend to be correct. He then goes away and refines them then comes back.
His stance now is that christian ethics are scientific – the notion of P prosecuting Christians stems from their misunderstanding that testimonialism pertains to all and any speech acts – it applies to public speech acts (speaking to the public about matters public) not a private community or each other.
Many jump off the train outraged if they don’t understand how P is developed: by public argument.
—
That fits Curts teaching style – the jargon stems from e-prime.
To avoid God like proclamations often requires pulling in “just the right term”. Then what happens is an operational argument becomes a definition elsewhere (one word or phrase to reference the argument). Overtime a “terms of art” has evolved.
The main hurdle to P is e-prime. From there definitions. Then, where I’m at, is general knowledge.
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-29 21:03:00 UTC
propaganda
[ˌpräpəˈɡandə]
NOUN
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause.
Propaganda is lying. Advertising is the truth spoken elegantly and succinctly. Marketing is getting attention.
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-29 15:34:46 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1222543616599580672
Reply addressees: @EricLiford @DegenRolf
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1222540792088145922
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1222540792088145922
What is the unspoken Truth that is the purpose of the entire anti-western postwar movement, as well as the jewish pseudoscientific prewar movement (marx, freud, boas, cantor-bohr, trotsky)? That he right is eugenic and left dysgenic and that democracy is incompatible both.
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-29 15:29:48 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1222542365220536321
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1222542363245121541
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
Our difference: the Right seeks to produce goods, services, information, behavior, human capital, and commons in a majority middle class meritocracy (aristocracy), while the left seeks to extract from the middle to empower the top to redistribute to the bottom (priesthood).
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1222542363245121541
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
Our difference: the Right seeks to produce goods, services, information, behavior, human capital, and commons in a majority middle class meritocracy (aristocracy), while the left seeks to extract from the middle to empower the top to redistribute to the bottom (priesthood).
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1222542363245121541
THE SERIES: GSRRM > PILPUL > SOPHISM > FALSE PROMISE CRITIQUE > ABRAHAMISM
(important) (core)
GSRRM is a form of avoidance by conflating disapproval with falsehood. It uses escalating means of shaming in order to achieve with disapproval what is true but they cannot tolerate.
SOPHISM or PILPUL is a tool of distraction and deception. In general it relies on uses of GSRRM, Idealism (abstractions), plus loading, framing, suggesting, obscuring, to (a) create a paradigm (b) that overloads your reason (b) and uses suggestion (c) to force you to appeal to your intuition (d) thus causing you to substitute your value judgements (e) thus creating a false impression of agreement, when the speaker has the opposite intentions in mind: deceit. Why? All communication requires we listen to a series of symbols that suggest a story of anything from a name to an epic narrative. At some point we understand (synchronize) with the speaker, and then either we or the speaker or both perform due diligence to warranty that we do not misunderstand. Sophism uses this period of suggestibility to cause you to fill in the blanks with information that corresponds to what the speaker says, but not to reality or any future reality. These systems fool you into falsehood.
FALSE PROMSE, or SEDUCTION to avoid a reciprocal trade. (repeat that a few times so you grasp it). A false promise or seduction so that you will pay a cost and the other party will not.
FICTIONALISM improves on SOPHISM but relying on telling more complex stores that undermine and overload the limits of the three human cognitive faculties: 1) the physical, 2) the logical, and the 3) emotional. The three techniques are 1) the magic-pseudoscience physical spectrum – the domain of pseudoscience, 2) the ideal-surreal rational spectrum- the domain of philosophy and 3) the supernatural-occult emotional spectrum – the domain of theology. These systems of deception offer discounts (false promises) of truthfulness and comprehension. They bait you into falsehood.
CRITIQUE is a form of undermining by GSRRM, SOPHISM, and FICTIONALISM and then pointing out imperfections, or straw manning imperfections that are not there, exaggerated, irrelevant or meaningless, and not providing a superior competitive solution that can be compared. These systems undermine competing *truthfully stated systems of thought*.
BAITING INTO HAZARD is a form of profiting from the use of the above techniques to profit from others error, fault, or failure of your engineering. Seduction and Usury are the canon examples.
ABRAHAMISM combines all, and adds baiting into hazard, with false and unwarranted or unwarrantable promise as a means of profiting from undermining the host polity.
If you understand this, you will have given names to the techniques of the enemy.
The adoption of the female strategy of undermining males.
By use of GSRRM as a substitute for solutions – usually to avoid payment, bearing of cost, or engaging in exchange.
By the use of SOPHISM as a substitute for argument and reason.
By the use of FALSE PROMISE to avoid an exchange.
By the use of FICTIONALISMS to create more elaborate false promises.
By the use of Critique to Undermine existing or proposed solutions without offering one that is viable.
By the use of Abrahamism to combine all of these into a strategy for undermining host civilizations.
Judaism to undermine, christianity to weaken islam to destroy civilization and reduce it to dysgenic ignorance and poverty.
Marxism to foster conflict between classes with a monopoly underclass. Postmodernism to foster conflict between science and fictionalisms – and to undermine western civilization by undermining truth merit and markets. Feminism to foster conflict between the genders and destroy the family. Political correctness to suppress the truth.
The enemy wants control they cannot manage like females want control they cannot manage if they have it. They follow the intuition of the herd. Conversely, we live in packs (families). We want no one to have control. We build a civilization without control. We built a civilization of markets and the resulting uncertainty. And we find joy in it. And we rescued mankind from ignorance with it.
Aristotelianism, Realism, Naturalism, Operationalism, Logic, Testimony(Truth), History, Economics, Natural Law, Technology, Science, Mathematics and the Natural Eugenics of Markets between the classes to evolve man into the gods europeans imagined, while reveling in our achievements all the way to the heavens we will create.
He who can destroy a thing, controls a thing.
Truth is a weapon.
It has always been our weapon.
Take it from this forge.
Wield it.
Win.
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-28 14:44:00 UTC
There is only one testimony of Jesus of nazareth and it is summarized in his sermon on the mount. There is only one gospel that I know of, and that is Mark, the rest are copies, and they are very likely fictions. It is likely that Mark’s is a fiction as well. It does not matter. Myths are made to serve a purpose and the authors of this myth like all other myths that survive, succeeded.
As for gods, the only gods are the archetypical characters we imagine that represent our tribe, nation, or race’s warrior in the battle of our group’s competition against other tribes, nations, and races.
There are however laws of the natural universe, and the natural law of man. Europeans chose a god that obeyed these laws. The Chinese came close second. Everyone else failed. And the semites institutionalized the art of lying instead – the most human, most harmful, and least divine of the religions developed by each civilization.
All that matters is that a jew, exposed to the thought of the greeks, romans, and Persians, whose people were conquered by Rome, and who the romans were depriving of their money changing, and were using the scam on their own people, rebelled against all of them in order to find some sort of cohesion and solace for the third world ghetto (sh-t hole country) that was Israel. And by using him as a victim-hero others created a new religion of undermining not only the jewish establishment but the empires.
Christianity does not matter – at all. the most we can argue is that if we fully secularize Jesus’ teaching, we end with exhaustive forgiveness as a means of maximizing the opportunity for peaceful cooperation, and forgiveness as incentives for those of weak temperament and negative experience, to slowly reciprocate that forgiveness and trust. That is all.
Church matters. Religion is an excuse for the psychological returns on church service. Religion’s community, ritual, oath feast, and myth (history) matter.
We have our history. Our Heroes. Our Saints. Our Civilization, our Cultures, our Literature, Law and our Science.
There is no reason for lies any longer.
Tell the Truth.
We are Europeans
We are the gods we imagined.
We know the law of the gods:
The laws of nature and the natural law of men.
The rest are ours to make.
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-28 12:33:00 UTC
EXPOSING THE FALSE MORALITY OF THE FUNDAMENTALISTS WITH THE TRUTH OF SCIENTIFIC MORALITY
(important)
—“Without God who cares. Women can lie and men can harass them. There are endless ways for people to be unfair and cruel. Without the conscience that comes with a Christian civilization people will beg for tyranny to live in peace.”—Bill Amy Grady
If that was true then there would only be one interpretation of christianity instead of hundreds. Astrology, Numerology, and Scriptural Interpretation are the three most common forms of sophistry and deceit. And the jewish method of pilpul (lying by sophistry) was institutionalized by the three ‘books of pilpul’.
Instead, there is only one law with two faces, and that is the law of reciprocity: in the negative: prohibitions – that is the contribution of european man; and on the inverse, the law of exhausting interpersonal forgiveness : in the positive: demands – that is the contribution of christianity.
The rest of christianity is lies and parables that offer false promises of unwarrantable rewards, in an impossible life after death to simple illiterate people lacking knowledge of reason, logic, science, economics and mathematics.
The Jewish method is expressly evolved for the purpose of profiting from free riding, parasitism upon the dominant males, and undermining using false promise and deceit – by demanding verbal or intellectual skills.
The islamic method is the same form of parasitism but depends on blind imitation rather than verbal or intellectual skills.
The christian method was just, like communism, a false promise to the underclass, in the semitic war against the european, iranic, egyptian, and north african peoples.
There is but one law of life: persistence of that form of organization we call life by the defeat of entropy and capture of energy by doing so – and the only difference between the physical world and the human is that we have memories, and can account for debts and credits between each other with extraordinary precision. And as long as our accounts are in balance with one another, or at least as long as we can foresee our accounts balancing, then we can continue to cooperate and to take risks to cooperate.
Truth: you use god as a shield by which you can ignore other humans, fail to compromise with other humans, fail to face your worth to other humans, fail to join the collective efforts of other humans, and instead to descend into self centeredness, self-congratulation, ignorance and obedience like the muslims, all while claiming you are doing good.
But you are just the man praying while others do the work: free riding on the efforts and honesty of better men.
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-28 09:55:00 UTC
The difference between western thought and all other thought is the difference between zero and one: infinite. Why? Truth, operationalism, completeness. Yeah, western thought is harder, and less intuitive, and less satisfying and not at all sedating. It is however, the only means by which we have converted the universe to an instrument of man’s will.
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-27 09:19:00 UTC