Theme: Truth

  • He’s failing at answering the foundation of the problem: the decrease in cost of

    He’s failing at answering the foundation of the problem: the decrease in cost of producing ignorance, error, bias, deceit, and the corresponding increase in cost of falsification – which is always higher in the first place.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-17 15:58:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1229435069644800001

    Reply addressees: @PyreResonant

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1229415664361902080

  • “He’s failing at answering the foundation of the problem: the decrease in cost o

    —“He’s failing at answering the foundation of the problem: the decrease in cost of producing ignorance, error, bias, deceit, and the corresponding increase in cost of falsification – which is always higher in the first place.”—


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-17 11:00:00 UTC

  • The Law of Public Speech

    The Law of Public Speech https://propertarianism.com/2020/02/17/the-law-of-public-speech/


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-17 01:45:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1229220242062266370

  • The Law of Public Speech

    THE LAW OF PUBLIC SPEECH [I]n public, to the public, in matters public, speak the truth regardless of cost. In public, to the public, in matters public, limit your advocacy and demand to reciprocity, regardless of cost. In public, to the public, in matters public limit others to speaking the truth regardless of cost, and advocacy of reciprocity, regardless of cost. Reciprocity and Truth regardless of cost are what the enemy cannot bear, and what the enemy undermines – because they are the foundation of western civilization. Why? Because truth and reciprocity are meritocratic and eugenic methods of competing in markets for sexual, social, economic, political, and military value. And because truth, reciprocity, meritocracy, and eugenics in sexual, social, economic, political, and military markets produce the fastest cooperation, innovation and adaptation that is possible for conscious beings. Superiority is Demonstrable.

  • The Law of Public Speech

    THE LAW OF PUBLIC SPEECH [I]n public, to the public, in matters public, speak the truth regardless of cost. In public, to the public, in matters public, limit your advocacy and demand to reciprocity, regardless of cost. In public, to the public, in matters public limit others to speaking the truth regardless of cost, and advocacy of reciprocity, regardless of cost. Reciprocity and Truth regardless of cost are what the enemy cannot bear, and what the enemy undermines – because they are the foundation of western civilization. Why? Because truth and reciprocity are meritocratic and eugenic methods of competing in markets for sexual, social, economic, political, and military value. And because truth, reciprocity, meritocracy, and eugenics in sexual, social, economic, political, and military markets produce the fastest cooperation, innovation and adaptation that is possible for conscious beings. Superiority is Demonstrable.

  • No, that’s just science and the data. You can lie if you want to because thats w

    No, that’s just science and the data. You can lie if you want to because thats what marxist, postmodernist, feminists, denialists, and abrahamists do to resist science.

    No more lies. The century of pseudoscience is over.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-16 23:45:20 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1229190054846791682

    Reply addressees: @EgSophie

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1229185650026516480

  • Fallacy of definition. The American eugenics movement, from which all others evo

    Fallacy of definition. The American eugenics movement, from which all others evolved, was the prevention of dysgenia by the sterilization of the dysgenic, not the controlled breeding for eugenic purposes. Removing the dysgenic produces eugenic ends. East Asia and NWest Europe.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-16 21:31:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1229156449651216386

    Reply addressees: @nathan_a_tanner

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1229155296070770688

  • “those things aren’t wholly separate they kinda have a lot to do with each other

    —-“those things aren’t wholly separate they kinda have a lot to do with each other!”—

    No. The truth of a scientific statement and whether or not we make use of a scientific statement are two different issues. She denied the truth of it. Not the ethics of it.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-16 21:25:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1229154892742348803

    Reply addressees: @nathan_a_tanner

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1229154451623174145


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @nathan_a_tanner Especially when they’re published by NPR. 😉

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1229154451623174145

  • UGH. WHAT’S P-LAW ON TABOO SUBJECTS IN PUBLIC SPEECH? —“How would holocaust de

    UGH. WHAT’S P-LAW ON TABOO SUBJECTS IN PUBLIC SPEECH?

    —“How would holocaust denial be dealt with under P-law?”– A Friend

    How would any public speech be dealt with under P-law?

    In public, to the public, in matters public, suppression of the truth, or attempts at discovering the truth are prohibited under P-law. Conversely, falsehood is prohibited under P.

    The difference is that under P-law, speech in public, to the public, in matters public, is involuntarily warrantied. Including the dishonest use of statements masquerading as questions. So, public trial by propaganda, sophistry, and falsehood is illegal and expensive for any party since the cost of correcting public speech is prohibitively expensive. As such one can investigate, and report findings, like we do in any science, but we cannot make claims or imply claims without liability for error, bias, and deceit.

    Personally I’m far less concerned about this subject than I am the destruction and death by marxism, bolshevism, Leninism, maoism; the current civilizational destruction under postmodernism and denialism; and the ancient world’s destruction by judaism, Christianity and especially the billion dead under islam. So, sure, I tend to think the holocaust industry has gotten out of hand but I don’t know truth from falsehood myself, and I think it would be useful to discover what’s true and what’s false in order to stop both sides from propagandizing.

    I hate this topic. I try to avoid it at all costs. But I do my job.

    My job is to answer the tough questions.

    That’s what y’all pay me for with those donations. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-16 14:59:00 UTC

  • BREAKING THE LIES IS THE ONLY WAY TO SURVIVE —“Break the lies as the last ditc

    BREAKING THE LIES IS THE ONLY WAY TO SURVIVE

    —“Break the lies as the last ditch effort to make peace. And failing that, break the lies anyway as the only means to make sure we don’t get dragged down with their failures. … Either way, the lies must be broken for our civilization to survive.”— Alain Dwight


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-16 13:50:00 UTC