NO EXCUSES; DO YOUR HOMEWORK; NO MORE LIES
We make it easy for you to get the education you wish you had received. Time is precious; we won’t waste yours.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LYwU4kT5G0g& https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LYwU4kT5G0g
Source date (UTC): 2020-03-03 14:29:24 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1234848354133213187
[I] think it’s either lying (intellectual dishonesty), rallying useful idiots around a lie to obtain power (ideology), or socially constructing a mythology for useful idiots to obtain power (theology). It’s not intellectually coherent enough to be a philosophy, and there is nothing scientific about it. The positive feedback loop for lying to satisfy intellectual dishonesty (self image), ideology (status by offense), theology(status by defense), is intense, which is why it works. It could be that like all the rest of the left he is incapable of producing a solution to prosperous evolution by cooperative competition in market meritocratic eugenics and so his only possible technique to mask the big lie of parasitism, is that I mean, his technique is to:
(a) recite a common falsehood quickly and with authority despite it’s falsehood, and move on. (b) state a falsehood and move on to another before the counter argument can be made, and move on. (c) state a falsification is irrelevant to him, unbelievable, or undesirable, as if approval or preference has any bearing on truth or falsehood. (d) rapidly spew unrelated emotionally satisfying sophisms so that it’s impossible to construct a coherent argument falsifying an argument that isn’t coherent. (e) shouting down or talking over counter arguments, to take advantage of the fact that emotive, incoherent, false, and dishonest arguments are more expensive and time consuming to correct with truth. I’m going to be charitable and assume he’s a genetically predetermined leftist(dysgenic, herd) expressing genetically determined female conflict strategy (undermining undesirable truths), but with male dominance, and male tolerance for disagreement, and is only subtly aware that what he’s saying and how he’s arguing is good enough to achieve his ends. I mean, you can look at him and see that he certainly has low sexual, social, cooperative, political, and military market value, but he definitely demonstrates disagreeableness and dominance expression, on top of the female cognitive strategy of undermining. And that is how females reward dominance expression in other females who engage in conflict on their behalf – with attention and undue praise. I mean, Ryan and Stefan have done their work. I think what I’d like to discover is which of those things he’s doing. But given y’all have asked me to debate him I guess I’m wiling even though it conflicts with my rule of ‘Don’t argue with the cognitively female, they aren’t capable of intellectual honesty so it’s pointless”.
[I] think it’s either lying (intellectual dishonesty), rallying useful idiots around a lie to obtain power (ideology), or socially constructing a mythology for useful idiots to obtain power (theology). It’s not intellectually coherent enough to be a philosophy, and there is nothing scientific about it. The positive feedback loop for lying to satisfy intellectual dishonesty (self image), ideology (status by offense), theology(status by defense), is intense, which is why it works. It could be that like all the rest of the left he is incapable of producing a solution to prosperous evolution by cooperative competition in market meritocratic eugenics and so his only possible technique to mask the big lie of parasitism, is that I mean, his technique is to:
(a) recite a common falsehood quickly and with authority despite it’s falsehood, and move on. (b) state a falsehood and move on to another before the counter argument can be made, and move on. (c) state a falsification is irrelevant to him, unbelievable, or undesirable, as if approval or preference has any bearing on truth or falsehood. (d) rapidly spew unrelated emotionally satisfying sophisms so that it’s impossible to construct a coherent argument falsifying an argument that isn’t coherent. (e) shouting down or talking over counter arguments, to take advantage of the fact that emotive, incoherent, false, and dishonest arguments are more expensive and time consuming to correct with truth. I’m going to be charitable and assume he’s a genetically predetermined leftist(dysgenic, herd) expressing genetically determined female conflict strategy (undermining undesirable truths), but with male dominance, and male tolerance for disagreement, and is only subtly aware that what he’s saying and how he’s arguing is good enough to achieve his ends. I mean, you can look at him and see that he certainly has low sexual, social, cooperative, political, and military market value, but he definitely demonstrates disagreeableness and dominance expression, on top of the female cognitive strategy of undermining. And that is how females reward dominance expression in other females who engage in conflict on their behalf – with attention and undue praise. I mean, Ryan and Stefan have done their work. I think what I’d like to discover is which of those things he’s doing. But given y’all have asked me to debate him I guess I’m wiling even though it conflicts with my rule of ‘Don’t argue with the cognitively female, they aren’t capable of intellectual honesty so it’s pointless”.
EXPLAINING ANTI-ABRAHAMISM (controversial post warning) (explanation of social bias) 1) P-Law and its Logic are universally decidable, because testimonial truth(word), reciprocity(deed), and evolution(consequence) are universally decidable. (Let that sink in a moment.) 2) Any people can eventually enjoy the benefits of a high trust civlization like europeans if they adopt P-Law, Logic, and Constitution – including market (via-negativa) soft eugenics. 3) While ethnocentrism is the optimum strategy at the local, state and civilizational level – because it decreases genetic, kinship, social, economic and political competition and decreases resistance to trust, reciprocity, and mutual insurance and care; so is heterogeneity polities, producing a market of commons because it allows moral and cognitive biases to play out at the cost, and to the benefit, of those who do it. 4) But groups whose competitive strategy requires successful practice of deceit, irreciprocity, and devolution(demographic decline), must convert from predatory and parasitic means of survival and competition to productive means of survival and competition. And groups that practice any and every strategy habituate, specialize in, and transfer between generations, the strategy, mythology, traditions, values, norms, habits, means of education, and especially means of communication, collaboration and argument that advances that strategy. 5) As such groups need incentives to adapt from destructive, predatory, and parasitic means of survival and competition to productive means. To do so requires reformation of mythology, traditions, values, norms, habits , means of education, communication, collaboration, and argument, to suit new the new productive strategy. 6) To produce those incentives we can outlaw the expression of those strategies, and use social, economic, and political alienation to cause deprivation of opportunity – and cause them to adapt their mythology, traditions, values, norms, habits , means of education, communication, collaboration, and argument. 7) The Purpose of Muslim, Christian, and Jewish religious monopoly monotheism and religious identitarianism; and of Boasianism-and-Freudianism ( pseudo-sociology and psychology), marxism(pseudo-economics), neo-marxism (cultural marxism, undermining), postmodernism (relativism), feminism (undermining the family), and human biodiversity denialism (science denial), were constructed by design to deny and undermine the universal decidability of testimonial truth(word), reciprocity(deed), and evolution(consequence).
—“In response to the post of the Institute regarding Jewish participants [in the Propertarian Movement], I understand the desire to have universal appeal across all groups, but… A feminine argumentative strategy paired with a parasitic evolutionary strategy knowingly employed to the detriment of European-descended peoples is the Jewish Group strategy, to which anti-Semitism is therefore a logical and natural reaction. The frame of anti-Semitism in my judgement provides the greatest immunity from resistance to, reversal of, and prevention of, the threats mentioned in the post, all of which originate primarily from those of Jewish descent.”— Reece Haynes via Facebook
Correct. Complaints of anti-semitism, whether that semitism is in jewish, christian, or muslim group strategies, are expressions of the attempt to prevent the use of testimonial truth(word), reciprocity(deed), and evolution(consequence), in universal decidability, and to preserve the competitive strategy requires successful practice of deceit, irreciprocity, and devolution(demographic decline), against people who practice testimonial truth(word), reciprocity(deed), and evolution(consequence), and the high trust, productive, evolutionarily successful nations that they parasitically depend upon. Quod Erat Demonstrandum. Thus Endeth The Lesson
EXPLAINING ANTI-ABRAHAMISM (controversial post warning) (explanation of social bias) 1) P-Law and its Logic are universally decidable, because testimonial truth(word), reciprocity(deed), and evolution(consequence) are universally decidable. (Let that sink in a moment.) 2) Any people can eventually enjoy the benefits of a high trust civlization like europeans if they adopt P-Law, Logic, and Constitution – including market (via-negativa) soft eugenics. 3) While ethnocentrism is the optimum strategy at the local, state and civilizational level – because it decreases genetic, kinship, social, economic and political competition and decreases resistance to trust, reciprocity, and mutual insurance and care; so is heterogeneity polities, producing a market of commons because it allows moral and cognitive biases to play out at the cost, and to the benefit, of those who do it. 4) But groups whose competitive strategy requires successful practice of deceit, irreciprocity, and devolution(demographic decline), must convert from predatory and parasitic means of survival and competition to productive means of survival and competition. And groups that practice any and every strategy habituate, specialize in, and transfer between generations, the strategy, mythology, traditions, values, norms, habits, means of education, and especially means of communication, collaboration and argument that advances that strategy. 5) As such groups need incentives to adapt from destructive, predatory, and parasitic means of survival and competition to productive means. To do so requires reformation of mythology, traditions, values, norms, habits , means of education, communication, collaboration, and argument, to suit new the new productive strategy. 6) To produce those incentives we can outlaw the expression of those strategies, and use social, economic, and political alienation to cause deprivation of opportunity – and cause them to adapt their mythology, traditions, values, norms, habits , means of education, communication, collaboration, and argument. 7) The Purpose of Muslim, Christian, and Jewish religious monopoly monotheism and religious identitarianism; and of Boasianism-and-Freudianism ( pseudo-sociology and psychology), marxism(pseudo-economics), neo-marxism (cultural marxism, undermining), postmodernism (relativism), feminism (undermining the family), and human biodiversity denialism (science denial), were constructed by design to deny and undermine the universal decidability of testimonial truth(word), reciprocity(deed), and evolution(consequence).
—“In response to the post of the Institute regarding Jewish participants [in the Propertarian Movement], I understand the desire to have universal appeal across all groups, but… A feminine argumentative strategy paired with a parasitic evolutionary strategy knowingly employed to the detriment of European-descended peoples is the Jewish Group strategy, to which anti-Semitism is therefore a logical and natural reaction. The frame of anti-Semitism in my judgement provides the greatest immunity from resistance to, reversal of, and prevention of, the threats mentioned in the post, all of which originate primarily from those of Jewish descent.”— Reece Haynes via Facebook
Correct. Complaints of anti-semitism, whether that semitism is in jewish, christian, or muslim group strategies, are expressions of the attempt to prevent the use of testimonial truth(word), reciprocity(deed), and evolution(consequence), in universal decidability, and to preserve the competitive strategy requires successful practice of deceit, irreciprocity, and devolution(demographic decline), against people who practice testimonial truth(word), reciprocity(deed), and evolution(consequence), and the high trust, productive, evolutionarily successful nations that they parasitically depend upon. Quod Erat Demonstrandum. Thus Endeth The Lesson
NO MORE LIES
Statements are true or they are not.
They are desirable or the are not.
To mask the true to promote the desirable is lying.
To mask the true to obscure the undesirable is fraud.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-28 20:09:00 UTC
To: Kimberly Kay
Statements are true or they are not.
They are desirable or the are not.
To mask the true to promote the desirable is lying.
To mask the true to obscure the undesirable is fraud.
There is no comparison to the abrahamic dark age, the christian destruction of the arts, letters, knowledge, schools, government, and religion of the roman world; the BILLION DEAD from the islamic destruction of the north african, Egyptian, levantine, Persian, north west indian, byzantine, and balkan civilizations and their reduction to dysgenia, poverty, and ashes; or the Marxist, Bolshevik, holocaust against the russian, and ukrainian peoples, and the millions of eastern europeans who suffered under the bolsheviks including the russians whose development was set back a hundred years or more? So far the Marxist-Communist-Socialist-Postmodernist program has cost 100 Million lives at least. How many more will be lost trying to achieve in europe and america what the russians achieved at huge cost they may never recover from, and the germans achieved at cost of being all but destroyed?
Why didn’t china have a problem until marx?
Why did india avoid the problem?
Why is western civlization experiencing the problem?
Why are some ideas – false promises – so insidious that they are worse than drugs? Why are women and underclasses in particular so suggestible and easy to bait into false promise?
Why do we tolerate that set of lies which is more murderous than all but the great plagues? And is constructed of lies by false promise of freedom from physical, natural, and evolutionary law?
These are the big questions of our age.
BTW: calling people nazis for arguing that some group of religions fosters undermining because of their cultural dogma and training is just evidence of the correctness of doolittle’s criticism.
Statements are true or they are not.
They are desirable or the are not.
To mask the true to promote the desirable is lying.
To mask the true to obscure the undesirable is fraud.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-28 20:09:00 UTC
—“God did not hand us the truth and the means to spread it, so we could cower and beg for our lives.”—Kevin Wu
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-28 18:11:00 UTC
In the end, I solve for one thing: the truth. The truth is merciless. The process of discovering it is painful.
The Physical Law of Nature, The Natural Law of Man, The Law of Transcendence of Man into Immortality, Omniscience, and Omnipotence.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-28 16:36:00 UTC
Not in conflict with Laws of Nature, Natural Law, or continued evolution of man (Law of Transcendence), into omniscience, omnipotence, and immortality, written in the language of those laws, that teaches us debt to nature, ancestors, heroes, of those laws, and adherence to them.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-28 14:55:42 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1233405422352130048
Reply addressees: @Advaitawho
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1233402924631498752