TOOLS OF DECEIT
|Falsehood -> Deceit|:
… Ignorance -> Error >
… … Bias->wishful_thiking >
… … … Loading->framing >
… … … … Suggestion->Obscurantism >
… … … … … Sophistry->Idealism (verbal) >
… … … … … … Magic ->Pseudoscience (physical) >
… … … … … … … Occult-> Supernaturalism (imaginary) >
… … … … … … … … Fiction (fabrication) >
… … … … … … … … … Denial
Source date (UTC): 2020-04-27 12:19:00 UTC
CONFRONTING THE COMFORTING LIES
by Noah J Revoy
Messed up people have a hard time applying P because it forces them to confront the comforting lies they tell themselves. I’m working on applications that are digestible and move people closer to truth.
In a world where people were raised right and taught Agency as a natural course of growing up it would be easy to apply P as a tool to prevent parasitism and lies from taking root.
Source date (UTC): 2020-04-26 13:35:00 UTC
YES. IN THAT SENSE, WITTGENSTEIN IS CORRECT
—“Do you recommend a Wittgenstein approach, a la philosophy just being a misunderstanding of language?”—Caleb Stevenson
Correct. I didnt understand until I’d finished the grammars, and come to the same conclusion, but yes. he’s correct.
Philosophy is either an error, a pseudoscience, or a deceit.
If we instead say that we have a problem of continuously reorganizing our paradigms to accommodate new knowledge, and from that to develop new choices (tactics) of transcendence (evolution) then that is the place I see for philosophical inquiry.
But truth is still a matter of law and its systems of measurement science and mathematics.
All language consists of measurements.
We can measure poorly or well.
Source date (UTC): 2020-04-25 20:44:00 UTC
THE TECHNIQUES: USING SOPHISTRY FOR DECEPTION
Our Logical Facility
… Reason:
… … 1. theology: wisdom: mythology, literary wisdom literature.
… … … theo-sophistry: supernatural sophistry, abrahamism
… … 2. philosophy: choice: realism, naturalism, operationalism, rational choice, reciprocity, completeness
… … … philo-sophistry: Idealism (platonism), textual interpretation, …. philosophical rationalism.
… … 3. Law: testimony: by realism, naturalism, operationalism
… … … legal-sophistry: ( … )
… … 4. science: testimony: by realism, naturalism, operationalism
… … … pseudo-science: material sophistry (…)
… … 5. mathematics:
… … … pseudo-mathematics: (…)
TOOLS OF DECEIT
|Falsehood -> Deceit|:
… Ignorance -> Error >
… … Bias->wishful_thiking >
… … … Loading->framing >
… … … … Suggestion->Obscurantism >
… … … … … Sophistry->Idealism (verbal) >
… … … … … … Magic ->Pseudoscience (physical) >
… … … … … … … Occult-> Supernaturalism (imaginary) >
… … … … … … … … Fiction (fabrication) >
… … … … … … … … … Denial
Source date (UTC): 2020-04-25 19:19:00 UTC
OATH (n.)
Old English að “oath, judicial swearing, solemn appeal to deity in witness of truth or a promise,” from Proto-Germanic *aithaz (source also of Old Norse eiðr, Swedish ed, Old Saxon, Old Frisian eth, Middle Dutch eet, Dutch eed, German eid, Gothic aiþs “oath”), from PIE *oi-to- “an oath” (source also of Old Irish oeth “oath”). Common to Celtic and Germanic, possibly a loan-word from one to the other, but the history is obscure.
SALIC LAW (/ˈsælᵻk/ or /ˈseɪlᵻk/; Latin: Lex Salica), or Salian Law, was the ancient Salian Frankish civil law code compiled around AD 500 by the first Frankish King, Clovis. Recorded in Latin and in what Dutch linguists describe as one of the earliest known records of Old Dutch. it would remain the basis of Frankish law throughout the early Medieval period, influencing future European legal syste… See More
COMMON LAW (n.)
mid-14c., “the customary and unwritten laws of England as embodied in commentaries and old cases” (see common (adj.)), as opposed to statute law. Phrase common law marriage is attested from 1909.
TESTIFY (v.)
late 14c., “give legal testimony, affirm the truth of, bear witness to;” of things, c. 1400, “serve as evidence of,” from Anglo-French testifier, from Latin testificari “bear witness, show, demonstrate,” also “call to witness,” from testis “a witness” (see testament) + root of facere “to make” (see factitious). Biblical sense of “openly profess one’s faith and devotion” is attested from 1520s. Related: Testified; testifying; testification.
Source date (UTC): 2020-04-25 12:22:00 UTC
“The Natural Law of European Peoples”: A fully commensurable system of measurement across all disciplines that tests for reciprocity in display, word (truth) and deed (action); the extension of the logic of the physical sciences (realism, naturalism, equilibration) to the psychological(individual) and social(group) sciences using economic terms (acquisition, cooperation, reciprocity); thereby completing the scientific method (falsification of all dimensions possible human cognition); and thereby completing the Aristotelian program; and thereby providing the explanation for the success of western civilization under that program: sovereignty, reciprocity, and truth – and the markets that result from their universal enforcement, and the evolutionary velocity (adaptation, innovation) that results from those markets.
“The Natural Law of European Peoples”: A fully commensurable system of measurement across all disciplines that tests for reciprocity in display, word (truth) and deed (action); the extension of the logic of the physical sciences (realism, naturalism, equilibration) to the psychological(individual) and social(group) sciences using economic terms (acquisition, cooperation, reciprocity); thereby completing the scientific method (falsification of all dimensions possible human cognition); and thereby completing the Aristotelian program; and thereby providing the explanation for the success of western civilization under that program: sovereignty, reciprocity, and truth – and the markets that result from their universal enforcement, and the evolutionary velocity (adaptation, innovation) that results from those markets.
Example: Requirements for Violating P-Law of Speech https://propertarianism.com/2020/04/25/example-requirements-for-violating-p-law-of-speech/
Source date (UTC): 2020-04-25 00:16:37 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1253840298968571906
—“Well, I’ve got a friend who’s really into manufacturing custom soaps. Let’s say she understates her soap expenses in a public space, because she’s embarrassed.”—
[T]hat’s In public, but not to the public, ad not about matters public. In other words no attempt to use the coercive powers of government nor to undermine the law limiting them, nor to pollute the informational commons, upon which the people depend. 1) not regular speech, but political speech: in public to the public in matters public. 2) I would expect lawyers to handle those in our existing court system, although I have recommended specialization of the court system, similar to the european court system where family, criminal, private, and public suits are separated. 3) Lawyers and judges and court officials are just as prosecutable under P-law as anyone else. So I expect that to shake up the industry. Marxists, postmodernists, feminists, etc, go to jail. Silly people are just silly.
—“Well, I’ve got a friend who’s really into manufacturing custom soaps. Let’s say she understates her soap expenses in a public space, because she’s embarrassed.”—
[T]hat’s In public, but not to the public, ad not about matters public. In other words no attempt to use the coercive powers of government nor to undermine the law limiting them, nor to pollute the informational commons, upon which the people depend. 1) not regular speech, but political speech: in public to the public in matters public. 2) I would expect lawyers to handle those in our existing court system, although I have recommended specialization of the court system, similar to the european court system where family, criminal, private, and public suits are separated. 3) Lawyers and judges and court officials are just as prosecutable under P-law as anyone else. So I expect that to shake up the industry. Marxists, postmodernists, feminists, etc, go to jail. Silly people are just silly.