Curt Doolittle

Theme: Truth

  • What Is A Non False Religion?

    —“What is a non-false religion?— from twitter.

    One that is not in conflict with Laws of Nature, Natural Law, or continued evolution of man (the Law of Transcendence), into omniscience, omnipotence, and immortality, written in the language of those laws – math, science, natural law – that teaches us debt to nature, our ancestors, their heroes, those laws, and adherence to those laws. That is the perfect, non false, religion. The Pursuit of Non-False Religion P-Law is compatible with religion. It’s that (a) Abrahamic religion is incompatible with testimonial truth; (b) testimonial truth is necessary to suppress de-civilization, destruction, and conquest by islam, judaism, and jewish marxism, postmodernism, feminism, and evolutionary science denialism – the purpose of which is to prevent continued transcendence of many into gods with european understanding of the language and words of the gods: math, science, the laws of nature, and the natural law of man; (c) nature thanks, ancestor thanks, civilizational-hero thanks, archetype thanks, the stoic method of virtue and mindfulness, and the epicurean philosophy, invented by europeans, constitute the only non-false religion we know of other than east asian ancestor worship, buddhist mindfulness, confucian wisdom, and ethnocentrism: self-love. We cannot produce a body of law free of falsehood, and that restores unification of church and state, with a religion compatible with the physical, natural, and transcendent laws, that closes the door to another body of undermining with the Abrahamic, female method of destruction of civilization by false promise of unwarrantable freedom from laws of nature, natural law of man, and necessity of evolutionary transcendence of man, baiting into hazard, creating conflict between the elites, classes, genders, and generations, destroying the informational, institutional, civil, familial, commons upon which our high trust civilization depends – and profiting from the managed decline. The only difficulty in this process is that christians resist the final reformation of their religion out of abrahamic deceit and into the imitation of Jesus – the invention of the feminine god of those who suffer – compatible with european civilization’s masculine gods, regardless of their names: Washington, Caesar, Jupiter, Dius, Zeus, Ziu, Tyr, Tiwaz, Dayus Pitar “sky father”; Alexander, Mercury, Thor; And the rest – “the gods of those who joy”.

  • What Is A Non False Religion?

    —“What is a non-false religion?— from twitter.

    One that is not in conflict with Laws of Nature, Natural Law, or continued evolution of man (the Law of Transcendence), into omniscience, omnipotence, and immortality, written in the language of those laws – math, science, natural law – that teaches us debt to nature, our ancestors, their heroes, those laws, and adherence to those laws. That is the perfect, non false, religion. The Pursuit of Non-False Religion P-Law is compatible with religion. It’s that (a) Abrahamic religion is incompatible with testimonial truth; (b) testimonial truth is necessary to suppress de-civilization, destruction, and conquest by islam, judaism, and jewish marxism, postmodernism, feminism, and evolutionary science denialism – the purpose of which is to prevent continued transcendence of many into gods with european understanding of the language and words of the gods: math, science, the laws of nature, and the natural law of man; (c) nature thanks, ancestor thanks, civilizational-hero thanks, archetype thanks, the stoic method of virtue and mindfulness, and the epicurean philosophy, invented by europeans, constitute the only non-false religion we know of other than east asian ancestor worship, buddhist mindfulness, confucian wisdom, and ethnocentrism: self-love. We cannot produce a body of law free of falsehood, and that restores unification of church and state, with a religion compatible with the physical, natural, and transcendent laws, that closes the door to another body of undermining with the Abrahamic, female method of destruction of civilization by false promise of unwarrantable freedom from laws of nature, natural law of man, and necessity of evolutionary transcendence of man, baiting into hazard, creating conflict between the elites, classes, genders, and generations, destroying the informational, institutional, civil, familial, commons upon which our high trust civilization depends – and profiting from the managed decline. The only difficulty in this process is that christians resist the final reformation of their religion out of abrahamic deceit and into the imitation of Jesus – the invention of the feminine god of those who suffer – compatible with european civilization’s masculine gods, regardless of their names: Washington, Caesar, Jupiter, Dius, Zeus, Ziu, Tyr, Tiwaz, Dayus Pitar “sky father”; Alexander, Mercury, Thor; And the rest – “the gods of those who joy”.

  • Feb 28, 2020, 6:11 PM —“God did not hand us the truth and the means to spread

    Feb 28, 2020, 6:11 PM

    —“God did not hand us the truth and the means to spread it, so we could cower and beg for our lives.”—Kevin Wu

  • Feb 28, 2020, 6:11 PM —“God did not hand us the truth and the means to spread

    Feb 28, 2020, 6:11 PM

    —“God did not hand us the truth and the means to spread it, so we could cower and beg for our lives.”—Kevin Wu

  • These are the big questions of our age

    Feb 28, 2020, 8:09 PM To: Kimberly Kay Statements are true or they are not. They are desirable or the are not. To mask the true to promote the desirable is lying. To mask the true to obscure the undesirable is fraud. There is no comparison to the abrahamic dark age, the christian destruction of the arts, letters, knowledge, schools, government, and religion of the roman world; the BILLION DEAD from the islamic destruction of the north african, Egyptian, levantine, Persian, north west indian, byzantine, and balkan civilizations and their reduction to dysgenia, poverty, and ashes; or the Marxist, Bolshevik, holocaust against the russian, and ukrainian peoples, and the millions of eastern europeans who suffered under the bolsheviks including the russians whose development was set back a hundred years or more? So far the Marxist-Communist-Socialist-Postmodernist program has cost 100 Million lives at least. How many more will be lost trying to achieve in europe and america what the russians achieved at huge cost they may never recover from, and the germans achieved at cost of being all but destroyed? Why didn’t china have a problem until marx? Why did india avoid the problem? Why is western civlization experiencing the problem? Why are some ideas – false promises – so insidious that they are worse than drugs? Why are women and underclasses in particular so suggestible and easy to bait into false promise? Why do we tolerate that set of lies which is more murderous than all but the great plagues? And is constructed of lies by false promise of freedom from physical, natural, and evolutionary law? These are the big questions of our age. BTW: calling people nazis for arguing that some group of religions fosters undermining because of their cultural dogma and training is just evidence of the correctness of doolittle’s criticism. Statements are true or they are not. They are desirable or the are not. To mask the true to promote the desirable is lying. To mask the true to obscure the undesirable is fraud.

  • These are the big questions of our age

    Feb 28, 2020, 8:09 PM To: Kimberly Kay Statements are true or they are not. They are desirable or the are not. To mask the true to promote the desirable is lying. To mask the true to obscure the undesirable is fraud. There is no comparison to the abrahamic dark age, the christian destruction of the arts, letters, knowledge, schools, government, and religion of the roman world; the BILLION DEAD from the islamic destruction of the north african, Egyptian, levantine, Persian, north west indian, byzantine, and balkan civilizations and their reduction to dysgenia, poverty, and ashes; or the Marxist, Bolshevik, holocaust against the russian, and ukrainian peoples, and the millions of eastern europeans who suffered under the bolsheviks including the russians whose development was set back a hundred years or more? So far the Marxist-Communist-Socialist-Postmodernist program has cost 100 Million lives at least. How many more will be lost trying to achieve in europe and america what the russians achieved at huge cost they may never recover from, and the germans achieved at cost of being all but destroyed? Why didn’t china have a problem until marx? Why did india avoid the problem? Why is western civlization experiencing the problem? Why are some ideas – false promises – so insidious that they are worse than drugs? Why are women and underclasses in particular so suggestible and easy to bait into false promise? Why do we tolerate that set of lies which is more murderous than all but the great plagues? And is constructed of lies by false promise of freedom from physical, natural, and evolutionary law? These are the big questions of our age. BTW: calling people nazis for arguing that some group of religions fosters undermining because of their cultural dogma and training is just evidence of the correctness of doolittle’s criticism. Statements are true or they are not. They are desirable or the are not. To mask the true to promote the desirable is lying. To mask the true to obscure the undesirable is fraud.

  • This century will have to contend with Doolittle on the law

    Statements are true, or they are not. They are desirable, or they are not. Whether they are desirable or not, has no bearing on whether they are true or not.

    But, disapproving of, denying, or obscuring the true whether desirable or not, says far more about your character, ethics, morals, and mind than stating the true whether it is desirable or not. 😉 This century will have to contend with Doolittle on the law, testimony and the demarcation between testifiable science and not – he completed transitioning the law’s into a science and operational logic – whether it is desirable or not. Just how it is.

  • This century will have to contend with Doolittle on the law

    Statements are true, or they are not. They are desirable, or they are not. Whether they are desirable or not, has no bearing on whether they are true or not.

    But, disapproving of, denying, or obscuring the true whether desirable or not, says far more about your character, ethics, morals, and mind than stating the true whether it is desirable or not. 😉 This century will have to contend with Doolittle on the law, testimony and the demarcation between testifiable science and not – he completed transitioning the law’s into a science and operational logic – whether it is desirable or not. Just how it is.

  • Mar 1, 2020, 10:08 PM “Statements are true, or they are not. They are desirable,

    Mar 1, 2020, 10:08 PM

    “Statements are true, or they are not. They are desirable, or they are not. Whether they are desirable or not, has no bearing on whether they are true or not.”

  • Mar 1, 2020, 10:08 PM “Statements are true, or they are not. They are desirable,

    Mar 1, 2020, 10:08 PM

    “Statements are true, or they are not. They are desirable, or they are not. Whether they are desirable or not, has no bearing on whether they are true or not.”