I look for five things: 1. Comprehension (do you understand P?) 2. Construction (how well constructed is your argument) 3. Precision (how parsimonious and balanced is it.) 4. Innovation (have you added an insight – hard but happens) 5. Poetics (is it aesthetically constructed)
Theme: Truth
-
I look for five things
I look for five things: 1. Comprehension (do you understand P?) 2. Construction (how well constructed is your argument) 3. Precision (how parsimonious and balanced is it.) 4. Innovation (have you added an insight – hard but happens) 5. Poetics (is it aesthetically constructed)
-
Prosecution of Falsehood and Irreciprocity Is Not Hate – It’s Justice
Prosecution of Falsehood and Irreciprocity Is Not Hate – It’s Justice. https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/31/prosecution-of-falsehood-and-irreciprocity-is-not-hate-its-justice/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-31 17:00:35 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1267138918056509440
-
Prosecution of Falsehood and Irreciprocity Is Not Hate – It’s Justice
Prosecution of Falsehood and Irreciprocity Is Not Hate – It’s Justice. https://t.co/5u3uWSWCon
-
Prosecution of Falsehood and Irreciprocity Is Not Hate – It’s Justice.
And suppressing justice is conspiracy to commit a crime. We don’t hate. We do, I do Jurisprudence (law). And you gave an example of using the Abrahamic technique of undermining via pollution of the informational commons, rather than competing in the market under sovereignty, reciprocity, truth, and duty of care to the commons: lying. No more lies. No more excuses for Lies. The Abrahamic Dark Ages of Deceit; Whether: – Supernatural: Jewish/Christian/Muslim, or – Pseudoscientific: Marxist/Boasian/Freudian/Cantorian, or – Innumerate: Statistical/Economic/Financial/Consumer Credit. – Sophistry: Postmodern/Feminist/Identitarian, – Denial: Politically-Correct, With false promises of: – Individual, Gender, Class, Nation, Race, Species Equality of: – ability, potential, outcome, value to others; To Circumvent – Power-Law, Pareto-Capital, and Nash-Reward distributions; – The Necessity of market eugenics, and prevention of non-market dysgenics. With The False Promise of – Universalism, Globalism, Monotheism; Are Over. – The Century of Lies is Over. – Welcome to The World’s Renaissance. No More Lies Truth or False = Truth/falsehood, (meaningful) Innocence or Crime = Reciprocity/Harm-Theft-Fraud (meaningful) Love or Hate = Approval/Disapproval (meaningless) Any Argument to: – Approval or Disapproval, – Love or Hate, When the question is: – True or False, or – Innocence or Crime; Constitutes: – Conspiracy to commit: – Deceit or Crime: And Can Only Be Judged: – A Crime. Demanding; – Restitution; – Punishment;
[fin]
Edit
-
Prosecution of Falsehood and Irreciprocity Is Not Hate – It’s Justice.
And suppressing justice is conspiracy to commit a crime. We don’t hate. We do, I do Jurisprudence (law). And you gave an example of using the Abrahamic technique of undermining via pollution of the informational commons, rather than competing in the market under sovereignty, reciprocity, truth, and duty of care to the commons: lying. No more lies. No more excuses for Lies. The Abrahamic Dark Ages of Deceit; Whether: – Supernatural: Jewish/Christian/Muslim, or – Pseudoscientific: Marxist/Boasian/Freudian/Cantorian, or – Innumerate: Statistical/Economic/Financial/Consumer Credit. – Sophistry: Postmodern/Feminist/Identitarian, – Denial: Politically-Correct, With false promises of: – Individual, Gender, Class, Nation, Race, Species Equality of: – ability, potential, outcome, value to others; To Circumvent – Power-Law, Pareto-Capital, and Nash-Reward distributions; – The Necessity of market eugenics, and prevention of non-market dysgenics. With The False Promise of – Universalism, Globalism, Monotheism; Are Over. – The Century of Lies is Over. – Welcome to The World’s Renaissance. No More Lies Truth or False = Truth/falsehood, (meaningful) Innocence or Crime = Reciprocity/Harm-Theft-Fraud (meaningful) Love or Hate = Approval/Disapproval (meaningless) Any Argument to: – Approval or Disapproval, – Love or Hate, When the question is: – True or False, or – Innocence or Crime; Constitutes: – Conspiracy to commit: – Deceit or Crime: And Can Only Be Judged: – A Crime. Demanding; – Restitution; – Punishment;
[fin]
Edit
-
You may compete – but not complain.
—“In western natural law, one can propose a superior, reciprocal and truthful solution, but one cannot undermine the current solution without providing one that is better.”—
-
You may compete – but not complain.
—“In western natural law, one can propose a superior, reciprocal and truthful solution, but one cannot undermine the current solution without providing one that is better.”—
-
Aristotle Got as Close to It P as Archimedes Got to Calculus
–“I wonder what they called P before all the great libraries were destroyed.”—Andrew Gribble
—“I’m pretty confident that Aristotle got as close to it P as Archimedes got to calculus.”—Luan Raphael
Archimedes: 287 BC. Epicurus 341 BC Alexander 356 BC Aristotle 384 BC When Alexander Crosses the Hellespont 334 BC, he conquered the persian empire at the expense of infecting europe with oriental despotism. We should not look at alexander as a hero, but as a fool who brings greece to an end, as napoleon that brought europe to an end. It took us until: newton-liebniz to rediscover calculus descartes to restore us to geometry (reality) Davinci to restore roman engineering It takes until the royal society before we institutionalize it again and reach greek and roman levels of schools. (1660) We don’t restore ‘physical’ thought until the industrial revolution ~1700-1830, physical thought We don’t restore administration and military order until Napoleonic France. It takes until Darwin before we reach aristotelian ‘cleanliness’ of thought. The main innovations are technological, and the main innovation in logic returning to Archimedes with Babbage by accident and Turing by design. We are, I am, still trying to restore aristotle, our original frame of european thought. I mean, realistically, the worst thing that ever happened is letting the barbarians across the hellespont. but there is no natural barrier in anatolia like there are in the caucuses to build a wall upon. so Anatolia must be lost.
-
Aristotle Got as Close to It P as Archimedes Got to Calculus
–“I wonder what they called P before all the great libraries were destroyed.”—Andrew Gribble
—“I’m pretty confident that Aristotle got as close to it P as Archimedes got to calculus.”—Luan Raphael
Archimedes: 287 BC. Epicurus 341 BC Alexander 356 BC Aristotle 384 BC When Alexander Crosses the Hellespont 334 BC, he conquered the persian empire at the expense of infecting europe with oriental despotism. We should not look at alexander as a hero, but as a fool who brings greece to an end, as napoleon that brought europe to an end. It took us until: newton-liebniz to rediscover calculus descartes to restore us to geometry (reality) Davinci to restore roman engineering It takes until the royal society before we institutionalize it again and reach greek and roman levels of schools. (1660) We don’t restore ‘physical’ thought until the industrial revolution ~1700-1830, physical thought We don’t restore administration and military order until Napoleonic France. It takes until Darwin before we reach aristotelian ‘cleanliness’ of thought. The main innovations are technological, and the main innovation in logic returning to Archimedes with Babbage by accident and Turing by design. We are, I am, still trying to restore aristotle, our original frame of european thought. I mean, realistically, the worst thing that ever happened is letting the barbarians across the hellespont. but there is no natural barrier in anatolia like there are in the caucuses to build a wall upon. so Anatolia must be lost.