Curt Doolittle

Theme: Truth

  • Don’t Hate, We Don’t Need To

    We don’t need to ‘hate’ anyone, we simply need the “rule of law of reciprocity”, and must insist on truthful and reciprocal speech to the public in public matters, as well as voluntary association and disassociation. The left are the haters and can’t succeed without lying and sowing discord between genders, classes, and identities. With the “Winning Right”, the rule of law of RECIPROCITY, insistence on truth, voluntary association and disassociation, the losing left would group together in localities where they can create their own local laws and norms suited to their wants and needs. What’s great about that? They couldn’t infect the rest of us with their ideological hell. Thanks to: John Mark and Curt Doolittle

  • Don’t Hate, We Don’t Need To

    We don’t need to ‘hate’ anyone, we simply need the “rule of law of reciprocity”, and must insist on truthful and reciprocal speech to the public in public matters, as well as voluntary association and disassociation. The left are the haters and can’t succeed without lying and sowing discord between genders, classes, and identities. With the “Winning Right”, the rule of law of RECIPROCITY, insistence on truth, voluntary association and disassociation, the losing left would group together in localities where they can create their own local laws and norms suited to their wants and needs. What’s great about that? They couldn’t infect the rest of us with their ideological hell. Thanks to: John Mark and Curt Doolittle

  • You’re either dishonest or ignorant. I’ve gone over the video in detail, and the

    You’re either dishonest or ignorant. I’ve gone over the video in detail, and the court documents. I don’t know the individual but I know others involved. You can make up fantasies in your head, but that doesn’t change anything. find the video, and watch the drivers’ side rear.

    Reply addressees: @M4A2020 @thequarksoup @billprady

  • You’re either dishonest or ignorant. I’ve gone over the video in detail, and the

    You’re either dishonest or ignorant. I’ve gone over the video in detail, and the court documents. I don’t know the individual but I know others involved. You can make up fantasies in your head, but that doesn’t change anything. find the video, and watch the drivers’ side rear.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-01 01:04:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1267260626302382081

    Reply addressees: @M4A2020 @thequarksoup @billprady

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1267259693392556032

  • The Enemy’s Technique

    Baiting in to Hazard (certain risk); By use of False Promise (circumvention of reality); Under cover of Sophism (pilpul); Justified by Critique (lie, criticism, straw manning) Under cover of Moral Pretense (lie); Under cover of Plausible Deniability (lie); For the purpose of profiting (by harm) From consumption of accumulated assets (undermining): … truth, reason, delay of gratification, manners, ethics, morals, traditions, cooperation between classes, organization of the classes, Thereby; …creating conflict, destroying trust, generating demand for authority, Authority that recursively issues another iteration of false promise, until all accumulated assets: …genetic, cultural, normative, artistic, economic, institutional and political; have been consumed; by expansion of the underclasses; whose reproduction or invasion, had been limited by; … productivity, property, market, law, and natural aristocracy.

  • The Enemy’s Technique

    Baiting in to Hazard (certain risk); By use of False Promise (circumvention of reality); Under cover of Sophism (pilpul); Justified by Critique (lie, criticism, straw manning) Under cover of Moral Pretense (lie); Under cover of Plausible Deniability (lie); For the purpose of profiting (by harm) From consumption of accumulated assets (undermining): … truth, reason, delay of gratification, manners, ethics, morals, traditions, cooperation between classes, organization of the classes, Thereby; …creating conflict, destroying trust, generating demand for authority, Authority that recursively issues another iteration of false promise, until all accumulated assets: …genetic, cultural, normative, artistic, economic, institutional and political; have been consumed; by expansion of the underclasses; whose reproduction or invasion, had been limited by; … productivity, property, market, law, and natural aristocracy.

  • Oct 31, 2019, 8:09 AM —“Quoting yourself?”—Chip Sills Is there some other wa

    Oct 31, 2019, 8:09 AM

    —“Quoting yourself?”—Chip Sills

    Is there some other way of demonstrating that a body of text is an excerpt from a larger body of text, thereby informing the reader that there is more to be known if desired? Is there some reason I shouldn’t disambiguate new content from repeated content? Is there some reason that salient ideas and arguments often buried in longer works, overlooked in reading, or ignored because of length, should not be promoted to quoted excerpt such that those with less time or patience can make use of them? Is there some reason I shouldn’t include both image and text so that either can be shared depending upon the medium its shared upon? Is there some reason that I shouldn’t use these quotes (short) excerpts (longer) in image form for marketing the ideas in feeds like twitter? I thought so.

  • Oct 31, 2019, 8:09 AM —“Quoting yourself?”—Chip Sills Is there some other wa

    Oct 31, 2019, 8:09 AM

    —“Quoting yourself?”—Chip Sills

    Is there some other way of demonstrating that a body of text is an excerpt from a larger body of text, thereby informing the reader that there is more to be known if desired? Is there some reason I shouldn’t disambiguate new content from repeated content? Is there some reason that salient ideas and arguments often buried in longer works, overlooked in reading, or ignored because of length, should not be promoted to quoted excerpt such that those with less time or patience can make use of them? Is there some reason I shouldn’t include both image and text so that either can be shared depending upon the medium its shared upon? Is there some reason that I shouldn’t use these quotes (short) excerpts (longer) in image form for marketing the ideas in feeds like twitter? I thought so.

  • New Constitution Ends the Problem

    1-OUTLAW false and ir-reciprocal speech, AND outlaws suppression of truthful and reciprocal speech. 2-REQUIRES all able bodied men bear arms 3-REQUIRES defense of the physical, normative, and informational commons.

  • The Relativity Priority Dispute

    —“Doolittle starts out by saying that Einstein was revolutionary for saying that “length is not static; it changes according to its placement in the universe”. The Theory of Relativity was NOT invented by Einstein, but by Henri Poircaré….”—

    What the f–k does that have to do with anything I said. (a) einstein invented the frame, period, end of story, (b) like all of us he combined recent works of others, into a solution none of them had seen – as do all thinkers, myself included, (c) you clearly are not informed or smart enough to comment on this subject. Yes, einstein gets an undeserved and disproportionate amount of the credit. It’s equally deserved to Lorentz and Especially Hilbert, who is far smarter than einstein. Yes, there is a very great similarity between Einstein getting the rewards from what was lorentz and hilbert’s work, just as Zuckerberg is getting rewards from what was the brother’s work. Read this and learn: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relativity_priority_dispute Likewise, just because I united popper’s falsification, strawson’s performative truth, chomsky’s grammar, and hayek’s law – and explained why poincare, brouwer and bridgman lost the opertionalist argument, doesn’t mean I”m plagiarizing, any more than einstein taking the various works of others, adding to and uniting them. We all stand on the shoulders of others, and all of us move the needle one step at a time forward. Yes, Poincare and lorentz (and maxwell) solved the underlying problem. But no they couldn’t provide the completion of it. I know your motivation is to discredit their only ‘virtuous’ intellectual amidst the long line of criminal liars all the way back into their origins. But it doesn’t work. It just makes you look stupid. Don’t stomp on a post to for attention, or to vent from failure to understand, or stress of your own mental reorganization. All you do is tell us you feel out of control in your life. Instead, Post to contribute. And Ask don’t assert.