Curt Doolittle

Theme: Truth

  • Demarcation Between Truth(decidability) and Choice (preference) Is Complete.

    I think the demarcation between truth(decidability) and choice (preference) is complete. Philosophy only tells us choice now, while law (reciprocity), science(consistency correspondence, and coherence), and mathematics(measurement) provide decidability regardless of choice. The top of the pyramid is not philosophy but testimony, law, science, mathematics, and the logic faculty in a consistent coherent ontology. While philosophy (arbitrary ontology) has nothing to say but choice. In other words, Law (cooperation) science (evidence) are merely an extension of testimony. Which is why the west developed them. We are the only people that base our law entirely on sovereignty and therefore we have no other choice but testimony, law, science and math for decidability.

  • Demarcation Between Truth(decidability) and Choice (preference) Is Complete.

    I think the demarcation between truth(decidability) and choice (preference) is complete. Philosophy only tells us choice now, while law (reciprocity), science(consistency correspondence, and coherence), and mathematics(measurement) provide decidability regardless of choice. The top of the pyramid is not philosophy but testimony, law, science, mathematics, and the logic faculty in a consistent coherent ontology. While philosophy (arbitrary ontology) has nothing to say but choice. In other words, Law (cooperation) science (evidence) are merely an extension of testimony. Which is why the west developed them. We are the only people that base our law entirely on sovereignty and therefore we have no other choice but testimony, law, science and math for decidability.

  • You haven’t encountered me. But it would be truthful if you had. ;)

    You haven’t encountered me. But it would be truthful if you had. 😉

    You haven’t encountered me. But it would be truthful if you had. 😉 https://t.co/QuoSFMSwk0

    Reply addressees: @NorthEazyBreeze

  • You haven’t encountered me. But it would be truthful if you had. ;)

    You haven’t encountered me. But it would be truthful if you had. 😉

    You haven’t encountered me. But it would be truthful if you had. 😉 https://t.co/QuoSFMSwk0

    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-02 02:09:46 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1267639514400468994

    Reply addressees: @NorthEazyBreeze

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1267639114049839105

  • I don’t do proud. I do truth, reciprocity, restitution, and punishment

    I don’t do proud. I do truth, reciprocity, restitution, and punishment.

    Reply addressees: @BradleyPittance @_ReaalAmerican_ @realDonaldTrump

  • I don’t do proud. I do truth, reciprocity, restitution, and punishment

    I don’t do proud. I do truth, reciprocity, restitution, and punishment.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-02 01:53:07 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1267635322835304448

    Reply addressees: @BradleyPittance @_ReaalAmerican_ @realDonaldTrump

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1267634693861707780

  • Supernatural, Moral, Rational, Scientific

    Supernatural, Moral, Rational, Scientific https://t.co/OfxuKDaQMR

  • Supernatural, Moral, Rational, Scientific

    Supernatural, Moral, Rational, Scientific https://propertarianism.com/2020/06/02/supernatural-moral-rational-scientific/

    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-02 01:41:59 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1267632521103192064

  • Reciprocity, Testimony, Dimensions

    Again. Dimensions.

    1. Logic = Constant relations of sense perceptions.

    2. Identity =(NAMES)

    – Internally consistent, not inconsistent, sets of properties – Constant Relations between collections of properties.

    1. Sets = (LANGUAGE)
    2. Science = (OBSERVATIONS)
    3. Operational = (ACTIONS)

    – Internally consistent (constant, consistent relations), Relations, , .) – Constant relations between collections of references – Empirical, externally correspondent, correlative – Constant Relations between collections of references and reality – Operationally consistent or operationally possible Causation – Constant Relations between collections of references, actions, and reality in time.

    1. Rational (reasonable) = (RATIONAL INCENTIVE)
      (choice)

    2. Reciprocity = (RECIPROCAL INCENTIVES)
      (cooperation)

    This is the full set of dimensions of causality that humans can perceive and compare in order to decide. Each depends upon the one before it.

  • Reciprocity, Testimony, Dimensions

    Again. Dimensions.

    1. Logic = Constant relations of sense perceptions.

    2. Identity =(NAMES)

    – Internally consistent, not inconsistent, sets of properties – Constant Relations between collections of properties.

    1. Sets = (LANGUAGE)
    2. Science = (OBSERVATIONS)
    3. Operational = (ACTIONS)

    – Internally consistent (constant, consistent relations), Relations, , .) – Constant relations between collections of references – Empirical, externally correspondent, correlative – Constant Relations between collections of references and reality – Operationally consistent or operationally possible Causation – Constant Relations between collections of references, actions, and reality in time.

    1. Rational (reasonable) = (RATIONAL INCENTIVE)
      (choice)

    2. Reciprocity = (RECIPROCAL INCENTIVES)
      (cooperation)

    This is the full set of dimensions of causality that humans can perceive and compare in order to decide. Each depends upon the one before it.